• gibmiser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      10 months ago

      Honestly I think that’s reasonable. Automated messages can be text only. Restricting voice does not harm any legitimate business that isn’t trying to trick people.

  • JohnBrownsBussy2 [she/her, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    From reading the article, “pre-recorded” and “artificial” voices are already prohibited for unsolicited calls, so I don’t see what this ruling would actually change other than a slight clarification. It’s not like robocallers are actually prosecuted in any meaningful way.

    • pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      It actually is prosecuted, but you have to file a complaint first.

      The only catch is that it has to be from a domestic call center. They have teams whose sole job is preventing TCPA violations, because it’s a few grand per violation, so it doesn’t happen super often.

  • 800XL@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    And that will get revoked come Jan by the GQP. A quick bullshit lawsuit about how it’s against the first ammendment and corporations’ free speech is hampered.

    • circuitfarmer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Ah yes, corporations’ free speech, the ultimate goal upon which our fascist paradise is founded.

      I hate this timeline.