• Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      And this isn’t some conspiracy theory. Read the Federalist Papers and you’ll find they didn’t want an unruly mob making decisions. Hence why senators were picked by states originally, and why there’s an electoral college instead of popular vote for president.

      • Diplomjodler@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        And it’s high time all this was fixed. Just because some dudes 250 years ago thought a system of government was good, doesn’t mean it’s still adequate today.

      • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        42
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I mean, if it leads to the US rethinking its policy of “Israel can kill as many children as it wants and it’s all good,” I’ll allow it.

      • Pratai@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        23
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        And the overwhelming majority of those kids have up to this point, never given two shits about what has been going on over there before this last year.

        Bandwagoning political idealism is cringy as fuck not to mention dangerous.

        • Shyfer@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          10 months ago

          Ya it’s way better to stay ignorant to the shitty stuff your country does in the world than gain awareness of new issues. It’s cool to support a genocide.

          • Pratai@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Yeah, there a huge difference when kids cherry pick the issues they want to be upset about and then use those issues as an excuse to not vote.

            I never said if ignorance is better. I said they don’t give a shit until it’s cool to be seen giving a shit. Maybe they should try always giving a shit. I’d bet we’d be a lot better of if these idealists worked 24/7. Instead of every four years.

        • orclev@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          The situation with Palestine and Israel is shit and has been shit for a long time now. Hamas are a bunch of bastards that are standing up against another bunch of bastards. They both suck and neither Hamas nor Israel should be shown any support at all. It’s like when the USSR fought the Nazis in WW2, neither option there was good, and just because the Nazis were slightly worse doesn’t mean the USSR deserved support.

          That said while Hamas absolutely doesn’t deserve any support, Palestine and the Palestinian people absolutely do, and the way they’ve been treated by Israel even before the current situation is terrible. The current situation is so much worse though, with Israel just going full mask off genocide now.

          Even if the US isn’t going to get involved in that conflict directly the least we could have done is just not support Israel, don’t provide them with weapons, shut the fuck up when other countries start accusing them of war crimes and genocide. Instead we’re doing the exact opposite, sending weapons to Israel and using our international clout to shield them.

        • homura1650@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          10 months ago

          Critism of US policy towards Israel has been a growing with the left for years. Now, a major change in the facts on the ground have made it a much more salient issue.

          • Pratai@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            10 months ago

            The left, yes. Not these kids that are bandwagoning shit. Because I’ve yet to meet anyone one the left that would refuse to vote over single-issue drama.

      • Reptorian@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I’m a Joe hater, and a voter of Joe Biden, and I agree with @[email protected] . I plan to vote for Joe Biden, but campaign against AIPAC-endorsed candidates in favor of democratic candidates willing to be critical about Israel without stepping over the line like “From the river to the sea” chant. Oct 7 happened, and abuses from Israel settlers happened.

  • DessertStorms@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Your mistake is thinking elections are, or ever were, about what the voters want.

    In reality - the establishment decides how best to maintain their control, then create the illusion of choice (since both candidates who reach the point of running for president serve them, in very slightly different ways), then have the media bolster that illusion and get the public to fight with each other to make sure we don’t stop to realise we’re being played and point our justified rage and frustration where they actually belong (with the manipulators, not those they manipulate).

    • PlasterAnalyst@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      The media keeps reporting things that people engage with because those figures drive advertising. If people didn’t engage with ragebait, then people like Trump wouldn’t have a chance of being elected. The entire media strategy of any politician right now is to say or do the most wild shit possible so that they appear in the news. Come up with a 3 word slogan, and bam, instant support.

      • DessertStorms@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I’m not sure what point you’re trying to make in reference to my reply…

        Yes, the media want money, but they can’t make money without maintaining a system that has commodified everything, including information, for profit. The rage bait would exist whether trump would have won or not, it’s not like it’s gone anywhere. It doesn’t exist to serve trump, it exists to serve the status quo (hint: having the president/PM change from one party to another, when both serve capitalism and the ruling class, isn’t a change to the status quo).

        • PlasterAnalyst@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          It wouldn’t exist if people didn’t engage with it. That’s why he’s always in the news. It’s not some super scientific cabal manipulating everyone. It’s a basic algorithm driven by engagement. Political groups just spend a lot of money driving that engagement. If you don’t like Trump, stop engaging with content featuring him.

  • Naich@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Short answer: no proportional representation. Long answer: lack of proportional representation. If you are going to have voting, at least let people vote for the candidate they want rather than the least worst option.

  • orclev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    10 months ago

    How we got here is really easy, we’ve arrived at the ground state of First Past The Post voting. Once you have two extremists facing off against each other it takes a massive effort to get a non-extremist into office as you can just cruise into an easy victory by running your own extremist against your opponents extremist. Each side effectively has a lock on their own party and it comes down to which extremist will be slightly less off-putting to the independents. In this case the extremist on one side has aspirations to be a dictator, while the other side is so utterly bland he makes milk look spicy. If Biden was any less progressive he’d literally be a Republican.

    That’s basically what Biden is banking on, that he’s so utterly boring and milquetoast that more independents will vote for him over the wannabe dictator of Trump while still getting enough Democrats to hold their nose and vote for him just to deny Trump the win.

    • takeda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      You’re kind of contradicting yourself. On one hand you are saying two extremists then later about that Biden is right centre.

      I agree with the later part. At this moment we have one extremist and one right center guy. The reason Biden is running is to be still appealing to Republicans and independents to dissuade them from voting for trump.

      Though, so much effort was put by media to make him look like he is Karl Marx reincarnated.

      • orclev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Biden is extremist by the standards of progressives in that he’s basically not progressive. He’s not a moderate Democrat, he’s far right of the DNC, which puts him ever so slightly to the left of the GOP. The only viable candidate for the DNC given FPTP was either going to be far right or far left, and with the push by their core to make sure Bernie was out of the running far right it was.

        • blargerer@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          Biden is not far right of the DNC, that’s an asinine claim. If anything he’s towards the left of the DNC. The DNC is just right-center as a whole. (There are obvious exceptions in true progressives that are under the Dem banner because of fptp, but there are like 10 of them or something).

          • orclev@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            10 months ago

            I think the confusion in this case is also a symptom of the problem. On the one hand you have the voters and on the other hand you have the politicians. By the standards of DNC voters, Biden is far right. His platform was basically undo Trump then don’t change anything after that. That’s not progressive and it’s not what DNC voters really wanted, but it was the best option they were given.

            On the other hand you have DNC politicians. By their standards Biden might be center of the pack, but only because most of them are clumped up over on the far right. There are very few actual moderate Democrats these days. There are a handful of extremists out on the far left like Bernie, a few moderates in the middle, in then the vast majority over on the far right that a couple decades ago would have been considered Republicans.

            Democrat voters haven’t really changed, but the politicians have shifted right as Republicans have moved ever further right. That’s why Democrat voters are unhappy with Biden, they’re looking for a moderate candidate, not as extreme as Bernie, but looking to make actual reforms. That’s why they loved Obama, he talked a big game on the campaign trail, and once in office was really good at spinning most of his compromises as wins (just look at Obamacare, literally a Republican healthcare plan that was somehow spun as the socialized healthcare Democrats had been pushing for).

              • orclev@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                10 months ago

                You’re missing the point, it’s a relative scale. You’re talking about far right relative to all the parties. I’m talking about relative to just the Democrats or just the Republicans. Think about the current political parties in the US as a pair of just barely overlapping bell curves. The left bell curve is the Democrats and the right bell curve is the Republicans. With each of those there’s a central and a far right and far left. Trump is far right for the Republicans, and so far off the chart for Democrats to not even be visible. Biden is far right for Democrats which puts him on the far left for Republicans. Bernie is far left for Democrats, which much line Trump puts him so far off the chart for Republicans that he’s not even visible.

                FPTP makes the most viable candidates for either party the ones that sit at either end of those bell curves. You either need to be as far away from the other party as possible or so close that you practically qualify for the other party. Landing in the middle of either extreme results in a loss during either the primaries or the general election.

        • Fahoobamagoo_n@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Biden is not closer to the GOP than the DNC. Either you are idolizing the GOP in thinking Biden could represent their platform, or you misunderstand that the DNC is not so far left from Bidens platform. Bernie is literally a different party but ran on the democratic platform for the elections, but the DNC itself identifies with Biden and Clinton politics.

    • SonnyVabitch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      Give me milquetoast extremism or give me death!

      I don’t really understand your charge against Biden. Skimming headlines from afar it seemed like he was supposedly the most progressive president in a very long time. Where do you think one should read up on his record in office if we want to judge his presidency?

      • orclev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        10 months ago

        Biden has largely just maintained the status quo. He hasn’t done anything to meaningfully progress anything. None of the problems facing the US or the world have been even remotely addressed by him. The best that could be said is he hasn’t made most things any worse, although he’s really giving it the college try with his support for Israel recently. The only reason Biden looks remotely progressive is because he undid all the stuff Trump fucked up. Just because the previous guy was running backwards doesn’t mean you get credit for returning to where you started when you’ve done fuck all since then.

        As for where to find his accomplishments, I’ve got no idea as he has very few worth mentioning. He’s managed to keep the economy going so there’s that I guess, and he supported Ukraine, but really that should be considered the bare minimum. Domestically he’s doing nothing of particular note.

        • vividspecter@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Climate change is by far the most serious problem facing the US and the IRA is a genuinely substantial step towards addressing that.

          • orclev@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            10 months ago

            Sadly too little too late. Something like that if done a decade or two ago might have worked, but at this point it’s a bandaid on a sucking chest wound. Dealing with climate change is going to require not only the kind of investment the IRA authorizes but equivalent foreign policy pushes, as well as a significant domestic PR campaign. The petrochemical companies have been allowed free reign to push their messaging for too many decades and now a significant portion of the US literally believes climate change is a hoax. It’s going to take something like the public awareness campaign that was instituted against tobacco companies to undo that damage and the best time to have done that was a decade ago. The second best time is now.

        • SonnyVabitch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          That’s an interesting perspective, thanks for sharing.

          Just because the previous guy was running backwards doesn’t mean you get credit for returning to where you started when you’ve done fuck all since then.

          I disagree with this point enthusiastically. If he steered the boat ten miles up river, that’s still a major achievement, especially if the previous captain had just drifted from bank to bank while he was actively putting holes in the hull. We don’t know how Biden would have sailed if he’d taken charge where the previous guy did, maybe he’d have stayed in one place, gone down stream, or maybe he’d taken another ten miles the right way, we’ll never know.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    10 months ago

    Biden because no party is going to deny a sitting President the opportunity to run again. It has to be their choice to not run (Johnson, '68).

    Trump because enough Republicans still believe 2020 was “stolen” from him.

    Iowa:
    https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/live-blog/iowa-election-2024-live-updates-rcna133678#rcrd30899

    “66% of caucusgoers think Biden did not legitimately win the 2020 election, and 68% of those voters are backing Trump. Just 16% of those voters are picking DeSantis while an even smaller 6% share are caucusing for Haley.”

    New Hampshire:
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/01/23/new-hampshire-voters-trump-trials-2020-election/

    "About half of those who voted in the New Hampshire Republican primary Tuesday believed the false claim that President Biden did not legitimately win the 2020 presidential election, according to preliminary exit polls, underscoring the persistence of Trump’s false claims within the GOP that the last presidential election was stolen from him.

    Of those voters who believed Biden did not legitimately win the 2020 election, an overwhelming majority — nearly 9 in 10 — voted for Trump in the New Hampshire primary on Tuesday, while about 1 in 8 voted for former U.N. ambassador Nikki Haley, the only remaining major challenger to Trump for the Republican presidential nomination."

    • MorganLeFail@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I teach this in my high school classes when they vote on the rare movie days. It really hits them how much more fair it is.

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    10 months ago

    By voters giving Republicans the house, and the MAGA crowd power to push Trumps agenda.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Thanks, And not a single person who downvotes is bothering with pointing our why they think it’s wrong!?
        It seems pretty obvious to me, Biden said he only ran for a single term, it was only when it became clear Trump would run again, and it looked like he had a chance, that Biden decided to run again too.

  • ctkatz@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    biden is the nominee because it is historically political suicide for a party to primary their incumbent. and in this case since the other viable nominee is trump, primarying biden feels like small d democratic suicide for the country. smart people who don’t like biden (for whatever reason, I include myself in that group) will get behind a biden candidacy enthusiastically just to. keep trump out.

    trump is the nominee because the republican party as currently constructed is no longer a political party but a cult. a cult of white male grievances that not only seeks to opress anyone not white and male but also has adapted old testament principles where the only ones who had any status at all were males. and the thing is, trump doesn’t believe in anything they do (except the racism and misogyny). he just accepts those people because they love him, he gives them permission to act as they do because he does. and the adolation from the people is the thing that drives narcissists. and the one thing those people want more than anything else is power for the sake of controlling other people. they want trump because trump wants their idolation and trump will give them everything just to be cheered. and yes I meant idolation.

    if the people don’t like this cycle’s choices, they should have voted in their party’s primaries. this year or 4 years ago.

    • Pratai@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      if the people don’t like this cycle’s choices, they should have voted in their party’s primaries. this year or 4 years ago.

      That’s just it. You nailed it-

      Everyone wants to whine and complain about whatever single-issue bullshit makes them look cool at work or school every four years, but almost never do what’s necessary to ensure said bullshit is kept to a minimum.

  • xc2215x@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    Too many third party candidates instead of just one or two. Bernie Sanders not being able to run also not to mention.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      10 months ago

      Why is it the most popular mention seems to be older than the 2 oldest presidents of all time, that people are arguing are both to old daily.

    • lefaucet@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      What drives me nuts is Bernie would win big.

      He talks about things people care about and makes sense. He was a huge hit at his town-hall meeting on FOX news a few years ago.

      If he and Clinton had teamed up in 2016 I think dems would have won the electoral college, not just the popular vote.

      • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        For years after his campaign, he was the most popular politician in the US. He is still more popular than any politician who’s active on the national stage. Above both Biden and Trump.

        Clinton more or less identified the issue with him: No one likes him, he doesn’t want to work with anybody. “Anybody” meaning the money-men who are determined the wreck the country. And so, he’s unacceptable.

      • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Even MAGA folks at least respect Bernie. I got that a lot in 2016. They knew I wasn’t a Republican, which made them suspicious of me until they found out I supported Bernie, at which point they’d actually say something nice about him.

        • NABDad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          My dad is a hard-right fascist who voted for Trump in 2016 and 2020, will vote for him again, and hates all Democrats with a passion.

          Before it settled into Trump vs Hillary he said if it ended up Trump vs Sanders he would vote for Sanders.

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    10 months ago

    People want Trump for the same reason they hate Biden.

    They are simply unwilling to admit what their candidate has done since Biden took office.

  • books@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Unfortunately the Republicans actually late listening to their voters where Democrats are not.

    Granted it’s because Biden is an incumbent…

    • GodlessCommie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      10 months ago

      I assume you meant hate listening.

      How does 70% of Dems wanting a ceasefire, and Biden refusing, translate to listening to voters? Voters wanted fundamental changes to police with defending, Biden’s solution, more funding and cop cities in Atlanta and Baltimore, to be trained by IDF no less. The only people the DNC and the RNC listen to are the wealthy. The working class has no say, influence, or voice in politics.

      • books@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Nah, sorry. I was on my phone.

        Republicans are actually listening to their voters and picking the candidate they want to run. Granted, he’s a shit candidate and shouldn’t be allowed to run, but thats a different issue.

        Biden wanted another term, so the DNC machine got on it and is pushing it down our throats despite the majority of dems not wanting it, because what are we gonna do? vote for trump? No, but they might have turn out problem circa 2016.

  • Meuzzin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Because a whole generation of Americans found a source of information that agrees with their dated belief systems. Regardless if they’re completely wrong. Thanks Meta!

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Dems don’t listen to constituents. They pay us lip service. That’s why I’m a Leftist. Dems are center-right (essentially what Nixon was).

  • Pratai@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Because most people do nothing but whine online about singe-issue problems and do nothing about bringing change in any real sense.