A woman and two children drowned in the Rio Grande on Friday while trying to enter the U.S. near a section of the southern border where Texas National Guard soldiers have prevented federal Border Patrol agents from processing and rescuing migrants.

    • shani66@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Yes. I live in a southern shithole and i’d completely get it if America decided to bomb the entire place into a parking lot with no warnings.

    • cranakis@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      “We’ll teach those goddamn migrants. How dare they come here searching for a better life?”

  • Djtecha@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Why is the federal government waiting for access from a state like Texas? Their officials are monsters and should be steamrolled to save lives.

    • PorkRoll@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      Because the federal government isn’t all that motivated to do anything about it. Republicans are evil and Democrats are apathetic.

  • SrTobi@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    11 months ago

    When they grandly talk that every soldier must refuse orders going against human rights, and if not, be legible to be tried and punished afterwards, they are talking about these kind of orders…

  • 000@fuck.markets
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    11 months ago

    I didn’t realize states had the power to block federal personnel from performing their duties. Maybe they should activate the National Guard to protect the border patrol guys so they can do their jobs.

    • Furedadmins@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      11 months ago

      They don’t but they told their soldiers they do. Federal border control isn’t going to get in a shootout over it while it goes through the legal system.

      • Thrashy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        What’s got me is, why bother with the legal system? Just call up the Texas National Guard into federal service and order them to enforce the law as regards Border Patrol’s access to the border. If they refuse, court martial ‘em. Either way, Border Patrol gets access to the border to cut down Texas’ illegal barriers, and Abbott gets an unsubtle reminder about how the states are subordinate to the federal government. Win-win scenario.

    • Necrosynthetik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Fuck red states. If people want to deny other people assistance in times of need, I say we do the same to them.

      • nieminen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        I get what you mean here, but I MUST point out that many people who live in red states don’t believe in the same ideology, or can’t get out.

        If there were a way to selectively punish the policy makers, and those that support it, I’m game. But this sounds like the same indiscriminate punishment rhetoric that Israel is using. (Please don’t take offense, I know it’s not how you meant it, just pointing it out)

        • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          I mean, we know who the republicans are.

          Personally, I think no one who currently holds office as a republican should be allowed to hold any government office or work at any private entity that works with the government.

          They’ve had years to leave the party as it has slid down into the nightmare it is today. The party is a hate group. Staying a member is damning.

        • tamal3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Selectively punish policy makers? Um voting. That seems to not be a popular idea though.

          • nieminen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            It’s not terribly effective due to the gerrymandering of the voting districts, everyone that is in office is still so because they gerrymander the district to people who vote along party lines, whether or not they know what they’re doing.

  • Melody Fwygon@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Biden needs to send the Army in and take over the Texas Border enforcement.

    Army outranks the National Guard, especially the state ones. The POTUS absolutely also does have power to command any National Guard unit to stand down as well.

    • TommySalami@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      Biden needs to send the Army in and take over the Texas Border enforcement.

      He legally can’t. He is not able to unilaterally use the military as a domestic police force. This keeps the executive from using the military as their personal cudgel.

      I agree with the strong arming via national guard though. I think there are some hoops, but there’s absolutely plenty of precedent for a president taking command of a state’s national guard (specifically in regard to border control as well).

      • Melody Fwygon@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        He absolutely can send an army unit with Orders to enforce his orders to the Nat. Guard.

      • CaptainProton@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Not police force, but actually to patrol the border? Isn’t that what they were set up to do? (Albeit to defend against state actors and not individuals)

    • CaptainProton@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Ironically, pretty close to what Texas wanted before being forced to do it themselves when the federal government did nothing about their complaints except denounce them for political points.

  • kubica@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 months ago

    You could divert the trolley without killing anyone but they are immigrants what do you do?

    • Kalkaline @lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      Is there a way to flood one side of the tracks, run the trolley over the other, and kill everyone on board the trolley and the switchman to own the libs?

  • rekabis@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    This crime occurred when people were crossing the border. The FBI needs to get involved and charge all involved with giving the order and physically restraining the agents with two counts of murder, and all present (excepting the Border Patrol agents) with accessory to murder.