• Doorbook@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    189
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    Next will be memory. They will say everything you meed should be stored online for a subscription fee.

    • littlecolt@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      60
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Microsoft is already trying hard. My poor mom did not notice all her files are on OneDrive. Now she has two laptops with everything remote on OneDrive. It’s has some advantages, but it’s annoying in so many more ways.

      • Tippon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        38
        ·
        11 months ago

        There’s a setting in Onedrive to keep a copy of everything on the device. It will still get stored in the cloud too, but it means that everything will be available if the internet goes down.

        • TheSlad@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          A few years ago my ex got a new laptop and it had onedrive enabled system-wide by default. She didn’t realize until after she had been using it for months, I had to spend several hours backing up her files and defenestrating onedrive. It not as simple as just turning it off because it was even on critical system folders, you have to go in the registry and remap the those folders manually one at time before you can disable it.

          It is possible, but it fucking sucks.

      • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Drake in the first picture: marketing.

        Drake in the second picture: surprise, we signed you up without asking. You’re welcome.

      • umulu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        27
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s not annoying at all. It’s peace of mind. People are just not used to it

        • doctorcrimson@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          Nah, fuck off. The cloud is a place you don’t have any control over. I remember getting angry when Windows 10 LTSC got an update that added an online backup system. I do not pay them to take a copy of my important work and documents, they should pay me for that privileges. Furthermore, it’s an absolute disgrace to see that on an LTSC copy to begin with, it’s meant to be the barebones OS that you purchase at a premium for minimal updates and changes as well as extended service lifespan.

          Fuck OneDrive, I store locally and I make local backups. What I own is mine without exception.

          • shneancy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            additionally I exclusively use local windows accounts. Passwords are to keep your nosy parents, partners, or kids away from your machine, if a hacker has physical access to your computer it’s jover, no amount of microsoft accounts will save you

        • missing_forklift@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          11 months ago

          if you want peace of mind, make your own backups and when you need them, you can pull them from your drawer, not from us-east-1 (currently on fire)

        • umulu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          I didn’t criticize anyone, I didn’t disrespect anyone, so it’s surprising getting this many downvotes and answers.

          Still, it’s your opinion, and I will still share mine.

          Local backups have their flaws, just like cloud backups.

          I have 1TB storage using my school account. I am constantly changing between devices, and I like having my files always accessible.

          Everything important, I keep in two local backups (external HDD and SSD).

          The only thing I dislike about onedrive, is the sync of desktop, documents and images folder. I have turned that off, but my docs folder still appears to be syncing with onedrive.

          Besides that, it’s the best thing for me. And like I said… “Peace of mind”. Just because you don’t like that, it does not mean it is a bad solution.

        • TheSlad@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          No, its kidnapping your data to keep you trapped as their customer. If you want peace of mind, you can make your own backups.

    • Coasting0942@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      This is Apple already.

      Oh. You can only afford 4GB iPhone? Not to worry, for only $10 a month we can store stuff for you.

      • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Also we got rid of photo stream and if you delete the file from the cloud then we remove it from every device

      • max_adam@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Google photos made it difficult to download or delete your pictures on purpose. You have to manually select them. There is still a way to get them and it was because of GDPR, when you ask google for the whole data of your account they include the pictures and video from google photos.

        • anivia@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          You don’t need to request all account data, you can request only the Google photos data

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    159
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    They’ll take away volume control (SW/HW buttons) and replace with dynamically adjusting “magic volume” so that you can’t mute ads.

    • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      112
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Oh Christ. You’ve just triggered a premonition in me–the Galaxy S32 Ultra will be the first smartphone with no physical buttons or ports. You can turn it “off,” but that will only turn on a sort of extreme power saving mode. It will still ping your location once every few minutes, and will keep the fingerprint scanner active. You will “turn on” the device by holding your finger on the fingerprint scanner for four seconds. They will advertise the “quick startup” as a new feature. Volume will be controlled by sliding your finger along the right edge of the phone, which the screen will wrap around all the way to the back. It will be impossible to hold the phone without touching some part of the screen.

      It will only allow wireless charging. You will not be able to connect it directly to a computer. In marketing, this will be to meet rigorous water safety standards. In reality, this will be to prevent you from using ADB to remove apps that come with the phone. You cannot turn off mobile data. You cannot turn off location. You cannot use a third party SMS application. You cannot choose your own wallpaper. You cannot set a private DNS. You cannot install applications that haven’t been approved by Samsung. You cannot block ads. This is all covered on page 74 of subsection 32(a) of section G8 of the terms and conditions that you agreed to when you set up the phone.

      They will meet the physical limitations of how well a small lens can focus light. Zoom will cap out at 150x. Nevertheless, there will be seven cameras.

      • Xanvial@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        correction a bit, you can use adb via wifi. That’s what I do to sideload an app to my Android TV

      • nicerdicer@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        You will not be able to connect it directly to a computer. In marketing, this will be to meet rigorous water safety standards.

        Making devices water-proof is also a marketing scheme to avoid replaceable batteries :

        Some manufacturers are already eyeing an exemption for batteries used in “wet conditions” to opt out electric toothbrushes and possibly wearables like earbuds and smartwatches. The exemption is “based on unfounded safety claims,” states Thomas Opsomer, policy engineer for iFixit, in Repair.EU’s post.

        Despite the coming up regulation on batteries and waste batteries by the EU Council batteries in water-proof devices will probably be exempt from being replceable, because the water proof feature of the device cannot be guaranteed. This undermines the right to repair and manufacturers can hope that customers replace their entire devices soon. Making phones water-proof is a loophole to seal off the device so that it is not to be repaired, at least without keeping the water-proof features after repairing.

        • Resonosity@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Yeah pretty sure the Fairphone 5 and its predecessors have a pretty good IP rating, despite their ability to have the battery removed.

        • Flax@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I dropped my phone in the bath once, so it’s worth it 🤣

          • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            11 months ago

            I dropped several flip phones in water ranging from bath, to sink, to ponds and creeks in the mid 00’s to mid teens before getting a smart phone. Out of probably 10 phones used only one was ever ruined by the water, the rest all dried out fine when taken apart and left to dry for a day or two.

      • shneancy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        nahhh you’ll be able to choose your own wallpaper, the average user will eat up all of those “feautres” but god forbid Keighleeeigh can’t put her little baby Xaileeyn as her screen saver

      • CharAhNalaar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Why are people up voting this? This is such ridiculous FUD that I can’t take it seriously.

        • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          I know, right? I mean, does he seriously expect virtually every smartphone manufacturer to put holes in his screen and take away his headphone jacks, removable sim cards, SD cards, replaceable batteries, and IR blasters, and switch to an aspect ratio other than 16:9? That would be ridiculous. They never make user-unfriendly changes!

            • wanderingmagus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 months ago

              And which of the changes he listed would the 95% figure you mentioned care about? By your definition, short of literally turning each feature into a micro transaction, there’s no such thing as user unfriendly changes - and knowing the general public, not even then.

  • Endlessvoid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    116
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    Don’t forget the RGB notification led!

    I switched to Chinese brand phones, they still have all this and they’re dirt cheap, currently rocking an Ulephone power armor 18t, which also has a flir infrared camera and a microscope for some reason. No I’m not joking, they work surprisingly well and have come in handy more than I thought they would!

    • BluesF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      11 months ago

      Not sure I’d consider £600 “dirt cheap” but the thermal camera is definitely cool.

    • Vlyn@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      11 months ago

      That was the first thing I missed when I went to a Galaxy S22. But aodNotify works great as replacement (you can make your own notification light this way and customize it, not a lot of battery drain either due to the OLED screen). But yeah, removing the notification light sucked.

    • thehatfox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      Don’t forget the RGB notification led!

      The Nexus One had this, the trackball had an RGB LED inside it. With custom ROMs it could be customised to flash different colours and patterns for just about anything.

    • mathematicalMagpie@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      The notification LED became a bit obsolete with AOD. I don’t need a bright flashing light, the notification being visible when the screen is off is enough.

    • AeroNaut@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      11 months ago

      Hey man, I know this is a rant, but in case you didn’t know there should be a setting to resize things to make a black bar at the top. Google it for your phone, but for samsung it’s something like “full sceeen apps”.

    • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      People look at me like I’m fucking insane when I get as upset about the blighted notch on my screen as I do. This screen technically has more real estate than my Razer Phone 2 back in 2018 did, but between the obnoxiously tall aspect ratio and the fucking notch, it has like 75% of the usable screen space. You know what was really nice? Watching TV shows on my RP2, with the 6" screen, all of which was used for the video. You know what sucks? Having a half inch of black bars on either side of the screen so that the 16:9 aspect ratio video can fit on the 18:9 aspect ratio screen. And it’s even more ass than that, because the top and bottom of the video look like shit because the screen wraps around the fucking sides.

      If the FBI could hear what I have to say about the engineers at samsung, I would have been arrested years ago

    • Wanderer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I drift through this world in a mood of indifference, frequently moving into disgust.

      But at times I read a comment like this and see that there is still beauty in the world. I love you.

          • Spectrism@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            If you’re talking about physical buttons, please no. Gesture navigation is an incredibly useful feature for those with short fingers like myself, who have problems with reaching the “Recents” button without weirdly tilting the phone and then stretching their thumb to the point that it gets painful over time. And while it’s technically possible to use gesture navigation on phones with physical buttons, it would definitely be weird. Not to mention that it’s also wasted space, because physical buttons obviously can’t just disappear when needed like on-screen buttons do, so you can have a bigger and more efficiently used screen. There are a lot of things that are dumb to remove from phones, pyhsical navigation buttons, in my opinion at least, are not one of them. I can’t even think of an advantage physical buttons would have over on-screen buttons.

            If you meant that you want to keep the option for on-screen button navigation, I’m all for it. Can’t hurt to have more options :)

            • Dynamo@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              11 months ago

              Well i meant physical buttons but i also think phone displays should be 5 inches, 5.5 at absolute most. Also, by the by, the main advantage of physical buttons is a) useabilty while gloved or with wet/dirty hands and b) being able to know precisely what button you’re on by touch

              • Spectrism@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                I don’t think this is a common use case for most people, but I can see how that might come in handy for some, so you’ve got some good points.

                • Dynamo@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Thx. It’s more about versatility in my eyes. A smartphone should be, above all else, practical. So a perfect phone for me would be something like Fairphone but with a 3,5mm jack, physical front buttons, and 2 cameras on the back (wide and normal/narrow lens). Mby additional sensors like a barometer, assuming that can be scaled down or done digitally/electronically.

        • aulin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          11 months ago

          That’s another thing they ruined! Oneplus had amazing gestures, but then Google enforced using their gestures only, and they’re so much worse! I especially hate that back is swiping in from an edge, which is in conflict with every side drawer and cropping tool in every app ever!

          • JCreazy@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            Yeah, I have the most problems with it in Thunder. I avoided using gestures for so long but they’ve grown on me.

            • aulin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              With Oneplus gestures back was swiping up from the bottom left or right. So much better. And the screen-off-gestures with drawing the pause symbol for play/pause or < or > for jump back/forward in a podcast or song. I miss them.

    • Lojcs@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      How often do you come across tall pictures? Most pictures sit well below the camera for me

  • Reddfugee42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    11 months ago

    I love it when uninformed troglodytes complain about a hole in the screen. They didn’t add a hold in the screen. The hole was already there. They just wrapped your screen around it for more screen. 😅

    • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      That’s nothing. Wait until manufacturers figure out that the optimal place for that “hole” is 1-2 inches lower than that. People are going to have a fit about dead pixels in the middle of the screen, even though they can now facetime with “eye contact”.

    • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s really infuriating seeing the downvoted on some other replies that point this out. The time/notifications/battery bar along the top used up screen space. Now those notifications are in the formerly dead space with the camera. It is objectively better. It’s not debatable because there is measurably more useable screen space without making the phone larger.

  • CharlesReed@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    The day I can’t find a phone that has an headphone jack is the day I go feral and become a hermit in the woods.

    • HipHoboHarold@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s the SD card for me. We are getting phones with 1tb now, so that will work. But with the phones that do offer it, you have to get the most expensive version for it. Meanwhile if they just give me an SD card slot, I can have that fixed myself. Just take the one out of my current phone and plop it in the new phone.

    • davidgro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      If you want the rest of the specs to be decent, then that day is fast approaching or already here.

      I had to jump from a phone that had about 5.5 of the features on that list to one with none of them (although I do like the 3 rear cameras) and I hate that I had to do that.

      But I kept “Easily rootable” and that’s what really matters to me.

    • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I hate the loss but just buy a bunch of USBC to headphone adapters, stick them on all your headphones/aux cables, and forget you don’t have a headphone jack on your phone.

  • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Smartphone manufacturers, if you’re reading this:

    I spent 6 hours on google to find a phone with a screen smaller than 6 inch. I did find none (except an old iPhone, but I want android), so I had to buy one 6 inch. It is too unwieldy. I am annoyed.

    There is a serious market for people like me. Do not look away. Somebody will buy these phones.

    Also, by the way, it’s not bad if the phones are a bit thicker.

    • Dog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      Zenfone. I know this doesn’t help you now, but keep that in mind next time you would like to get a new phone.

    • Kevnyon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      Small phones don’t sell, that’s just the thing. Asus tried for a few years, it didn’t work and now the Zenfone 11 is going to be big again. I’m personally on the other end of it, I’m never going smaller than my current phone (Edge 30 Fusion) because I really like the big screen.

      • Macros@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        The thing is: Asus phone where never small.

        I still use my Nokia N9 from 2012 daily as second phone. It has 117 x 61 x 12 mm. The Asus Zenfone 8 has 148 x 69 x 9 mm. Thats 25% higher (And also 25% heavier)

        If you like big screens thats fine. There are plenty of offers for you and the market caters to you. I like small screens and device, because I tend to use complex Apps which require me clicking all over the screen. This is a hassle even with the Pixel 5 which I now got to use apps required (Banking, and so on) I have no options to buy such a device for year. Yes there are very few sometimes popping up like the Unihertz Jelly Star Star, but they all lacked features I consider essential.

        (In this case update support, no OLED and Android apps can not deal with the low resolution display) Other features I miss but by now do not even dare to dream of: Real Multitasking, ability to fully customize the lock screen and menus (e.g. to red fonts for stargazing), weeks of standby time in flight mode and a single week in GSM mode, ability to work fine in 2G too because no copious amounts of data are sent in the background without asking you.

        So yes there are plenty of options for the standard user, all with minimal differences. But for users like there are many in this thread, there are none.

      • Ataraxia@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I thought I liked smaller screens. My first was an iPhone 4s. My last is a Samsung s20 ultra and any other screen now seems so tiny. I have very small hands by the way. Like child sized.

    • Sentau@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      There is a serious market for people like me

      Unfortunately this just seems to be not true. Samsung, sony, google, apple all had smaller phones in their lineup at one time but eventually pulled them from the stack because they were not profitable. Don’t even get me started on the small phone scene in the budget segment. Absolutely no options exist. The unfortunate reality is that while small phone enthusiasts like us are very vocal, we a vocal minority and not enough of us exist who can make designing a smaller phone viable for companies.

    • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      See, I want a smaller screen on my phone too, my big issue is that when manufacturers go with a small screen, they usually also think “budget phone”. No. Fuck you. I want a premium phone, same as any other flagship, but smaller. Sure, you can lose a camera, I don’t care as long as the pictures are still decent… You can put in a smaller battery too, there isn’t as much space inside so I get it… But give me all the same of all the other sensors and storage and everything.

      They just won’t.

      • Sentau@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        my big issue is that when manufacturers go with a small screen, they usually also think “budget phone”

        Wait I thought the situation was different. The only small phones I see are models of premium flagships while the budget segment has humongous monstrosities because designing a small phone with decent packaging and heat dissaption requires much more R&D

        • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          First, it depends on what you consider small. Second, a big problem with the premium phone segment is their obsession with the idea of thin. Like your phone should be a piece of paper in your hand kind of thin. Obviously that’s extreme and impractical but it seems like their objective… To reduce the thickness of the device to it’s minimum.

          I don’t really care about how thick my device is, as long as it does the job and isn’t unreasonably thick (like, an inch thick), I couldn’t really care any less.

          Premium “small phones” (examples that come to mind are things like the pixel 8, Samsung S23, and the non max/xl/whatever iPhone, to name a few) are still rather large… Often with screen sizes around or larger than 6". To go smaller, you would need to go for their cut rate phones, like the pixel 7a or iPhone SE. The only standout is the iPhone SE with a 4.7" display, the pixel 7a is 6.1". Samsung is also 6.1". These phones often have concessions that make them unappealing to me. Whether it’s a lack of memory or missing sensors, or software cuts… Whatever it is, it’s there. On top of that, you need to also accept the 6"+ screen on these devices which is the main problem. I was happy with the Nexus 5 screen, or the 5X, or even the pixel 1… At 4.95" for the Nexus 5, and 5.2" for the 5X, and 5" for the pixel. To me, this is more optimal. I’m solidly an Android user and I’m pretty firmly in the pixel ecosystem, so I’m forced to accept 6" to 6.2" screens.

          I’m currently using a pixel 7, and while I’ve accepted that this is what I must work with, I’m displeased overall with the screen.

          Yes, there are cheap/budget phones that have utterly monstrous screens and phablet designs, usually using last-gen CPUs and the bare minimum of RAM; but I’m not talking about that stuff, the budget segment is wild and completely unpredictable. The cuts to CPU and RAM alone are enough for me to walk away. Unless I want to go for a small manufacturer that may not support me in my region (much, if at all - for which, updates are critically important to me, so I wouldn’t), I’m pretty stuck. I went with the pixel because it’s not monstrous, and it gets updates before most others, usually all others. The concessions I need to make about the screen are less important to me right now than having all the features and support I desire from my device.

          As I see it, my only real option right now is to abandon Android and go with a very recent/modern, iPhone SE or mini. It’s the only way I would have a screen that’s less than 6". This is not desirable for me because I have usage issues with iPhone. Which isn’t to say the iPhone is a bad product, it’s just not the product for me.

          • Sentau@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            I don’t think the base model iphone, galaxy or pixel are small. What I meant was phones like the iPhone minis, pixel 4a, S10e, etc.

            I mostly agree with you but have a small observation. You are using the screen size to argue that the phones are small but you are mistaken. The iphone se has a 4.7" screen as compared to the 6.1" in the iPhone 13 but in terms of phone size, the se(138.4 x 67.3 x 7.3 mm) is only 9 cm shorter than the while being just as wide and thick. The mini is smaller even though it has a bigger screen. There is a similar issue with the nexus phones you give an example of. While the screens were much smaller, the phone dimensions weren’t as drastically different to the standard 6.1" premium phones now because the older phones had much bigger bezels.

            • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              IMO, it’s about being able to one-hand the phone. With the Nexus 5, though the phone wasn’t much smaller than something like my pixel 7, the bezel put the screen within reach of my thumb while holding the phone. With the 7, I have to adjust my hand or two hand the phone to reach the furthest parts of my screen.

              I don’t have small hands.

              6.1" is too big for my preferences. Give me a 5.5" or even a 5", and I’ll be flying.

    • SargPotTea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      Unihertz tank mini might be what you like, I have the tank 2 and it has all the features… Including a projector, headphone jack, camping lights, ir blaster, battery that lasts 3 days with heavy use and red and blue emergency lights.

    • Raz@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Have you tried Sony’s Xperia 5 series? They are fairly compact and the 21:9 ratio makes it nice and slim.

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    The IR blaster needs to come back. They were mostly on phones pre-smart device where they had super limited usage. With a smart device, they could practically do anything. I wanna use my phone as a universal remote, damn it.

    I want a 0hysical.keyboadd too. Touch screen sucks.

    • slaacaa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      I had it on my Xiaomi around 5 years ago, amazing stuff. Could turn on-off air conditioning anywhere, great party trick

      • DampCanary@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        my POCO has it, one remote is great feature, and it’s easier to find when it can be pinged.

    • bmsok@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Oh man, I wish I still had this. I miss the days when I could mess with a friend’s device and watch them lose their mind. Definitely a fun game as long as everyone else in the room knew it was a harmless prank.

    • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      0hysical.keyboadd

      They were removed, not suppressed. No need to write in code like it’s spam for dick-pills. Though I would like my goddamn ¢@mεra bu#0n back.

  • vexikron@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    Do many people know that there is actually a patent for the idea of an advertisement that plays to a certain point… and then does not end, will not let you skip it, until you as the user, via a camera and microphone, can be verified to have assumed a pose, made a facial expression, and/or said a specific phrase?

    The actual patent shows a smart tv ‘owner’ standing up and saying McDonalds! in order to like keep watching Netflix.

    We quite literally have the tech and the legal framework for ‘Drink Verification Mountain Dew Can’ to actually be a thing.

    • antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      The illustration of that patent practically a meme, many on Lemmy should know it.

      Though it should be kept in mind there’s thousands of patents that were never actually applied, and this one was filled back in 2009.

      We quite literally have the tech and the legal framework

      Do patents necessarily have to follow the law?

      • pivot_root@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        11 months ago

        Though it should be kept in mind there’s thousands of patents that were never actually applied, and this one was filled back in 2009.

        This is genuinely a good thing, then. If you patent something and “accidentally” never use it, it prevents other companies from using it legally. Screw over advertisers and save the consumers from their terrible ideas by hoarding patents and working with a patent troll firm :)

        • unrelatedkeg@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          Not really. Patests expire and then they can just read the specs in your idea. No reverse-engineering effort required.

          • pivot_root@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            It takes 20 years for patents to expire, and you can’t commercially use the patented invention until then. If I “invent” and patent 50 different methods to track viewer attention during video advertisements, that’s 50 fewer ways that some company would be able to achieve it.

            It would be impossible to cover every possible method to achieve the same thing, but the risk of violating a patent held by a highly litigious patent troll might be a good enough deterrent to stop the whole idea from making it to market for a couple decades.

            • unrelatedkeg@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              Yes, but after 20 years you’re not at square one, others have free reign to use and abuse your expired patent. Sure, you can tacticize patents in a way where you make a starting patent, then before it’s about to expire “expand” it with a new one in a way which invalidates use of the previous, but I don’t know if that “loophole” is patched and if not, how it looks in real life.

              • pivot_root@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                That is an entirely valid concern, and I see where you’re coming from with that. It would be short-sighted to introduce something revolutionary, only to open the floodgates for everyone else to start implementing it two decades later.

                I was thinking of using patents more along the lines of “throw shit at the wall and see what sticks.” Rather than trying to come up with every conceivable method for tracking user attention and patenting those, the hypothetical patent troll would create and patent hundreds of different smaller, novel processes that may or may not be needed as part of a larger system for tracking user attention. The overall goal being to make it likely enough for one or more of those patents to be violated that a company would consider it too risky to go anywhere near the idea of commercializing attention tracking software/hardware.

      • vexikron@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Eh? Do patents necessarily have to follow the law?

        …no? They are ideas.

        They are also a legal construct to organize business uses and control of ideas around.

        Hence a patent and the patent system are a legal framework.

        Legal frameworks are often involved in things that later end up being determined to be illegal.

        Large businesses usually like to set up some kind of comprehensive legal framework before they roll out a new product or feature.

        Not saying they will. I am saying setting up a legal framework is usually groundwork before you do though.

    • sam@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      OLED displays have obsoleted notification LEDs. And phones with physical keyboards don’t sell.

      • Elektrotechnik@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        OLED displays certainly could, but there is no baked it app that wakes up the screen only if you have a message, blink in different colors or frequencies depending on the message and use the low power always on display api.

        Yeah, you can glance at your always on display and make out the little symbol. But that’s not an adequate replacement to the notification LED. If I had to guess, it was removed to drive up engagement with your phone.

      • steveman_ha@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I wouldn’t call the “always on display” some kind of innovative technology that makes notification LEDs obsolete… AOD is a battery draining complement to notification LEDs, not a replacement – we just don’t have the latter anymore because of corporate greed and consumer mentalities :/

    • FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      11 months ago

      Controversial: it was much easier and safer to text while driving with a physical keyboard. You could type with one hand, hold the steering wheel with the other, all while still looking at the road because you could feel where the buttons were.

  • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    Give me back my goddamed physical keyboard

    I still remember the extended conversation I had with the cell phone man on the day I realized that time had moved on, and it wasn’t even possible for me to buy a third-party phone that still had a keyboard and then hook it up to their network anymore. I was just going to have to poke haplessly at the glass and get letters wrong for the rest of my life.

    IT’S MY MONEY, LET ME BUY THE KIND OF PHONE I WANT