• spirit@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Update 3: @[email protected] did state that they (singular) disagree that a genocide is taking place.

    Update 2: My conclusion


    Update: So I dug around a little deeper, and found that


    On another topic, there are rumors circulating that we are fascists or supported genocide. These claims are completely false, and like most viral twitter threads, are coming from a single Mastodon user on a personal vendetta who didn’t provide any sources. Such slander doesn’t deserve any response and is best left ignored.

    Update: More info about @[email protected]

    • Red Army Dog Cooper@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      So um, no one on the face of this earth hates fascism more than a communist, the evidence you dug up only seems to reinforced the not a fascist and its utterly rediculous to call us that.

    • andobando@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Nothing here says he’s a fascist. His “genocide denial” stance stems mostly from the idea of being anti-capitalist and not trusting US-centric sources. Its not entirely without merit. Noam Chomsky for example is accused of the same thing for the Pol Pot genocide, though at the time he was right for the same reasons – accusations started flying in the US based on completely banal sources.

      I used to be like this, its not entirely harmful. And in any case, I don’t give a shit about his politics. We should be thinking about how to separate peoples politics from the platform, and the work hes done on Lemmy does exactly that.

      • GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Noam Chomsky for example is accused of the same thing for the Pol Pot genocide, though at the time he was right for the same reasons – accusations started flying in the US based on completely banal sources.

        You’re giving Chomsky’s version of the story, but it’s such a weird story because one of the only communist projects Chomsky ever spoke in favor of was easily one of the worst ones (along with Peru), ones that even hardcore “tankies” disavow. Like, wasn’t this the motherfucker that said the dissolution of the Soviet Union was a victory for the “left”?

        Granted, there is misreporting on Cambodia, which started when it was contemporary and continues to this day, but that misreporting is mostly on the magnitude of the crimes committed, not the basis of calling them crimes (i.e. they were still awful).

        Anyway, Chomsky is a shitty left-neoliberal [PDF]

        • andobando@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          He didn’t speak in favor of it. Sources came up saying millions were being killed in Cambodia. Chosmky questioned the sources saying “where the fuck is this coming from? Nothing supports this”. Thats his version of the story, yeah but hardly any evidence he supported Cambodia.

    • gk99@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      See, it’s all this stuff that really makes the

      Such slander doesn’t deserve any response

      statement feel very Steve Huffman to me. It very clearly does deserve a response because the problem doesn’t end with just saying “nope lol that’s not us” and people like me have to go digging through all this bullshit just to figure out the facts: they believe anti-China news and similar is U.S./media propaganda and will moderate opposing viewpoints with “Orientalism” bans and similar. That’s not a hard statement to type, and if this viewpoint is in good faith then I struggle to see why they refuse to just say that and consistently resort to “if you don’t like our moderation policy feel free to join/start a different instance!” without ever actually clarifying the moderation policy. Even lemmygrad pretty much says outright “if you like capitalism, fuck off.”

      • ram@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I mean, dude’s not CEO, he doesn’t control the instances. He does own a very large instance, but I don’t think it’s even the most dominant instance post-redditting.

        I disagree with his views, though I will admit to some sympathy on some aspects (not the genocide stuff), but ultimately, he’s just a dude who makes this software. He doesn’t own it, he doesn’t have a monopoly on its control, and really, the entirety of the Fediverse could, if he went full Huff, say “fuck you” and defederate his instance. That’s the power of a distributed service. Heck, your own instance, kbin.social, could lemmy.ml at any time and it’d have little impact overall.

        Even were I to concede to him being “Huffman-like” (which I do not agree with), I don’t think he’s actually relevant enough in the real-world usage of the software to care about as far as that goes.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Having gotten involved a bit over the last week, I think he’s generally a good guy. I disagree with his politics, but none of that has anything to do with software development. He writes good code, and when he’s not overwhelmed with nonsense, he’s quite helpful.

          There’s another major dev, but I don’t know anything about him. I think they just want to build a cool tool that they can use to provide a safe space for discussion, and they want to make that available to others as well. That’s pretty cool, and that’s something I can support.

          • ram@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            Ya, I don’t have any personal interactions with him and am withholding real judgement without. Even his politics, it’s hard for me to really condemn him when I don’t even know the lens he’s viewing things through. End of the day, I’m taking a best guess based on a few (3?) instances where he’s ever been recorded saying something that’s shit.

            But also, even the worst tankie’s better than the best right winger, any day.

            • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              Eh, I consider myself to be the opposite of both politically, but I have no problem contributing to FOSS projects lead by either. But I agree in general, I’ve had better luck with socialists than fascists when it comes to FOSS.

              • GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 years ago

                Slightly contra- the other user that responded to you, I need to ask: You’ve spoken with rightwingers before, right? Most westerners have had the “privilege” at least a few times to allow such people to speak for themselves. Have you ever had an even slightly comparable interaction with a “tankie” where they also got to speak for themselves, rather than be told about what they believe third-hand?

  • Stahlreck@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I hope this new influx of people will also bring in a nice influx of nerds who will make this platform better over time. :)

      • Binzy_Boi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I was recently sharing Lemmy to some people and how the entire Reddit blackout is stupid considering everything the platform has done in the past and the mindset of the CEO.

        Someone brought up Voat and they were lamenting how that failed, and I decided to check out the WayBack Machine captures for it, and Christ, nothing but antisemitism and racism.

        • Lenins2ndCat@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          OH BOY VOAT

          Yeah. Free speech absolutism does not attract a good crowd, and once you attract that crowd you will not attract any other crowd because the content output they produce is repellant to any normal person.