Update: In light of the programming.dev update here https://programming.dev/post/8399272, the defederation is no longer going ahead.

However, something more needs to be said. Even here on Blahaj, some of our users took issue with the choice to defederate over this issue.

So I would like to give some background and context.

Blahaj Zone exists, because both Kaity and I left mainstream social media to escape transphobia. Reddit, with its lackluster approach to fighting transphobia, and twitter, with its outright celebration of transphobia pushed us here, to the fediverse, and to create Blahaj Zone and Blahaj Lemmy.

To that end, we will continue to treat transphobia seriously. Our goal is to create a space where gender diverse folk can exist and let our defenses down a little, where we don’t have to worry about getting dragged in to an argument with a transphobe, or a bad faith actor “just asking questions”.

If you are looking for a more reddit like experience, where in the interest of increased engagement, we let low level transphobia slide, and push responsibility for dealing with it on to community mods and individual users, then you will likely not be happy with blahaj going forward. If you choose to stay here, understand that we may defederate again in the future over similar issues.

The choice is yours.

======

It has recently been brought to my attention that the lead admin of programming.dev is engaging in ongoing transphobia.

You can see the conversation in question here https://programming.dev/comment/6131539

For that reason we will be defederating from programming.dev in 48 hours.

There are only three communities on that instance used by small number of our users, so this won’t have a big impact, but if you are one of those users, you will need to use an alt account on another instance if you wish to access the communities.

  • dodgy_bagel@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    9 months ago

    So everyone involved seems to agree that transphobia is bad, but the dude had an idiotic notion of what constituted transphobia.

    I feel that if we are in the business of defederating anyone who fails a purity test then lemmy will be quite small indeed.

    • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      9 months ago

      I will defederate from any instance with admins that excuse transphobia. If that makes our part of the Fediverse quite small, that sucks, but it is what it is. I moved here to get away from social media that won’t take action on transphobia. I’m not suddenly going to decide it’s ok if it means we get more traffic.

      • First Majestic Comet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 months ago

        Not talking back or being snarky but if you feel that way you might seriously want to look into Lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works, they have very bad track records of letting transphobes and bigots run wild, Lemmy.world is the worst, many of the people they’ve banned for bigotry have been unbanned or were only given temporary bans to begin with, often times they won’t even action users who are engaging in transphobia, even if reported. It’s really not great.

        I used to believe Beehaw was a bit overly strict but honestly I can see they blocked these instances for good reason, especially Lemmy.world.

  • Dio9sys@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    9 months ago

    Would it make more sense to just block that one admin? Defederation is typically for a community-wide problem, and I’ve really not run into any issues with normal users of programming.dev

  • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    9 months ago

    This article does a good job at explaining that Hogwarts Legacy is transphobic because some of the profits will be donated to anti-trans causes.

    https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/hogwarts-legacy-release-brings-transphobia-harry-potter-franchise-rcna69628

    Rowling herself has implied that her royalty checks are indirect indicators of the popularity of her views on trans rights. She will be profiting off Hogwart’s Legacy, and at least part of that profit will likely go directly into the hands of those responsible for pushing the fight to roll back trans rights, causes Rowling has implied she donates to.

    This article explains the antisemitic blood libel conspiracy theory that is a core part of the game’s plot.

    https://www.gamepur.com/guides/hogwarts-legacys-goblin-uprising-anti-semitic-plot-controversy-explained

    Players can choose to align themselves with Ranrok, but the game explicitly paints this as an evil decision, aligning those players with the Dark wizard faction. On top of that, Ranrok and his Dark wizard allies in the Rookwood Gang have a plan to harness the power of this forbidden magic by abducting the player character (who is a teenager) and extracting and using their blood. This latter detail hews uncomfortably close to “blood libel” conspiracy theories which have been leveled at Jewish communities across the world for centuries, in which Jewish people were accused of abducting and murdering Christian children in order to use their blood in sacrilegious rituals.

    I spent some time watching videos on the game’s plot. I couldn’t find a specific line in a cut scene where the villain explicitly says he wants to harvest the protagonist’s blood. But he does explicitly set some guys after the protagonist to try to kidnap them. They need the protagonist because they are the only one who can interface with the MacGuffins, ie plot devices. This MacGuffin interfacing seems to be hereditary in nature. Also, the villain’s powers, specifically the graphics, definitely seemed blood themed to me.

    The game is transphobic and antisemitic. Arguing the game is not those things is transphobic and antisemitic. Whether or not the admin in question knew that is irrelevant.

    No one is mandated to educate people about any minority group that they are a part of.

    That being said, I wholeheartedly believe that it is in our interest as an LGBTQ+ community to educate people when an opportunity arises. So much hate and bigotry is derived from ignorance. The more we can do to educate people about transphobia the safer we and the people we care about will be irl.

    Ada is going out of her way to talk to the admin in question which she does not need to do, but I am glad that she is. She would be perfectly justified in defederating the instance without further discussion. Making a safe space for trans people means defederating from instances that espouse transphobia. By defederating, users on blåhaj zone will not see what this admin’s posts or comments, regardless of where the posts or comments are made.

    This is what the post in question looks like if your lemmy account is on blåhaj.

    https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/7199610

    Most of the comments are not visible because we are defederated from Hexbear.

    I’m really not a fan of how Hexbear users handled this. I am also not a fan of blåhaj being the admin’s trans best friend. Despite that, I think this comment from the admin is relevant so I’m linking it here.

    https://programming.dev/comment/6173847

    I get the sense that this admin is engaging in transphobia and antisemitism because of their ignorance involving the game. I hope that in talking to the admin, Ada will be able to explain the error in the admin’s position. Hopefully the admin will correct their position going forward and we can continue to federate with their instance. But I think that in the absence of that hypothetical success it makes sense to defederate.

    It took me a bit to think about it, but it’s good that we take a proactive position on combating transphobia. Tolerating intolerance for the convenience it might bring, in not having to make multiple accounts or having more perceived allies, really doesn’t do us any favors in the long run. If we don’t stand up for ourselves we are only giving cover for transphobes to maneuver covertly in our online space. Rowling is a terf. Hogwarts Legacy funds her terf causes. We don’t need blåhaj to be connected to instances that fail to understand that. The point is to have an instance that is a safe space for trans people and more broadly LGBTQ+ people.

    I’m adding this at the end, because this shouldn’t matter, but I think some people think it does. I am trans. I am ethnically jewish.

  • hollyberries@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    9 months ago

    Copying a top level comment from @[email protected] since I’m a blahaj user and 100% agree with what they’re saying and the view won’t get discarded.

    It seems many of the comments don’t agree that this issue is worth defederating. That whole thread was exhausting and filled with childish nonsense on both sides, fuck JKR fr but this is very silly. Please don’t defederate, and let people enjoy the game if they want to? Like, I’m pretty sure there are better fights to fight.

    • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I am going to repost my comment here because it was removed with the top comment and I believe it is relevant to the discussion. I would also like to add to it as well.

      Here is my addition after I had a good night’s sleep:

      I would prefer to federate with the larger lemmy community. However we are submitting ourselves to the standards and moderation practices of the larger lemmy community as part of that federation. In exchange, we should expect something in return, which should be a concrete goal.

      Getting other admins to agree that the things that are harmful to the trans community, such as transphobic video games that fund anti-trans causes, should be the low bar we ask of other lemmy communities. This is not a purity test, as others have suggested. This is a consensus that we should reach with lemmy communities about our shared reality.

      This consensus on our shared reality is desirable, because if the general lemmy community can agree on what is harmful to members of our community, then the larger lemmy community becomes a safer for place for members of our community. We are not asking the general lemmy community to stop playing the game or even to engage in a boycott, although we would of course appreciate that. We are specifically asking the general lemmy community to agree on what is harmful to trans people. This consensus on seemingly trivial issues establishes shared moderation practices that help us to achieve our goal of a safe place for trans and LGBTQ+ individuals on the internet. edit: typo

      Here is my original comment:

      This issue can seem insignificant and it can be tempting to want to brush it under the rug. I have personally have this urge to not to want to upset allies or potential allies. But Rowling as a famous, rich person does a lot of harm to trans people by contributing money to anti-trans causes. This game is the most recent piece of content that funds her ability to donate to those anti-trans causes. If this admin can understand that then we should be fine to stay federated.

      Unfortunately the nature of discourse in the post obfuscated this issue. Simply explaining the error in the admin’s argument backed up with sources should have been sufficient. The personal attacks do not add to the discussion and make it harder to arrive at any understanding. I think the conflict and ‘finding a win’ is sort of the goal with the tactics displayed in the thread, but that doesn’t mean we can’t talk about the issue seriously.

      The error in the admin’s argument is that the content of the game is not important when the profits of the game go to causes that undermine the well being of trans people.

      https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/hogwarts-legacy-release-brings-transphobia-harry-potter-franchise-rcna69628

      Again, I understand the nature of discourse made the topic seem childish. However, this is the fight we are fighting. There is no other hill for us to die on. We can only choose how we defend it, not who else is on the hill with us.

  • Adramis@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    If I cut out everyone in my life that is 99% of the time a staunch ally, but still eats at Chick-Fil-A, my life would be very, very empty. No one is ever going to be a perfect ally / comrade, even queer people. I feel like it’s especially telling that the person got so heated because they want to be an ally and don’t want people to abandon them because they played a single stupid fucking game. Especially because there’s no ethical consumption under capitalism, it’s easy to death-of-the-author JKR without realizing the direct transphobia in the game. A lot of the direct transphobia in Hogwarts Legacy isn’t obvious (like misgendering the token trans in the game files) and most people don’t know about it. Does that suck? Yeah. But that doesn’t mean those people are transphobes or bad faith actors.

    I get that we need to have a sharp eye to make sure bad faith actors don’t fly under the radar, but false positives do a lot of harm too. I really feel like this came down more to Hexbear doing what Hexbear does and setting the entire thread on fire than it points to transphobia on the programming.dev admin’s side. Of course people are going to get stupid when you’re getting insulted, flamed, and spammed with stupid-ass emoji.

    • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      This isn’t that.

      This is the lead (cis) admin of a Fediverse instance telling trans people that a Potter game is “the opposite of transphobic” and then arguing with trans folk about it, diminishing the relevance of their pronouns as a side issue, and calling trans folk “insane” for having an issue with the game.

      The hexbear pile-on clearly got to them, but that’s not an excuse for the other behaviour. I need to know that other admins will deal with transphobia even when it’s hard, not that they’ll resort to it when they’re frustrated.

        • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          9 months ago

          When confronted with something he did wrong, he chose to double down.

          We know what kind of person he is.

          • Fal@yiffit.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            9 months ago

            What exactly did he do wrong? I’m super confused about what’s transphobic about the mod’s responses, other than that they disagreed with what a trans person (from hexbear no less) was saying

            • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              All the Harry Potter stuff aside, he was called out for using the wrong pronoun for someone. That’s fair, it happens. A normal person just apologizes and moves on.

              Our friend gets instead decides to get all “trans people are too sensitive and this is why no one likes you”. That’s a pretty big yikes.

              The fact that he was baited into it (because, let’s be fair he totally was) is no excuse. It’s some pretty horrific shit to say for a supposed “ally” (which is a total bullshit term anyway. We know what it’s worth when things get tough).

              • Melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                9 months ago

                If he actually said “trans people are too sensitive and this is why no one likes you” I’d be right there with you. He didn’t say that, though. Maybe that’s what it meant, but it’s not the read I got. He said that getting offended at him [for making a mistake] was not helping their case.

                Yeah, he should have handled it differently, but it’s not “trans people are too sensitive and this is why no one likes you”, it’s “we’re in an argument and you’re getting upset at me for something I couldn’t have known.”

                Because she didn’t just tell him her pronouns, she accused him of misgendering her intentionally, in a discussion where they’re already attacking each other back and forth so it easily reads as another attack to someone who’s not used to being told pronouns.

                And I mean fuck, maybe he’s really a monster beneath all of that. But I don’t think that what we’ve been shown is enough to condemn him and know what type of person he is. It certainly isn’t enough to condemn an entire instance in my opinion.

                Maybe I give people too much credit, but defederation is a big deal and I haven’t seen people talking about other instances of transphobia either from this admin or other people on the instance, so it seems like there’s a good chance that it’s a miscommunication.

                • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Oh I agree with most of this. If you look up my top comment, I don’t support defederation over this. This is something that needed to be handled at the community mod level.

                  He’s not a monster. He’s just a normal guy. He reacted poorly and he has some low hanging fruit in personal growth roadmap he can take care of. But I’d be lying if I said I haven’t done similar things online and worse, albeit in different contexts.

                  In the end, it comes down whether you trust the instance admins as a whole and the instance administration processes. I don’t get the impression that he operates as a dictator that abuses admin rights to settle personal slap fights. I get the impression administrating programming.dev is a team effort.

  • Melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    9 months ago

    This alone doesn’t seem like something worth defederating over. It seems like they just got baited hard by Hexbear. Did the comment chain get censored? It doesn’t seem like there’s much active transphobia here.

    The only thing that reads as actually transphobic to me is when they say “And getting offended by it really isn’t helping your case here.” in response to someone getting mad at being referred to as “they”, and that itself was due to technical issues and not transphobia.

    Frankly, one angry snapback and a slap fight with Hexbear doesn’t seem worth defederating over. I’m all for defederating bigots, but I don’t want hapless allies getting caught in the crossfire.

    • spaduf@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 months ago

      but I don’t want hapless allies getting caught in the crossfire.

      Especially not for the sake of hexbear

      • Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 months ago

        But the admin here really likes Hexbear and has expressed the intention of federating with them the moment instance level blocking works

        Honestly this whole thing has me window shopping for another instance due to our admin again siding with Hexbear

        • Leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          I’ll very sadly and reluctantly have to do the same, if that happens - and whilst I’m not saying you’re wrong, I’ve not seen @Ada say anything along those lines, certainly not officially.

          I do understand wanting trans-positive instances to stick together but I do feel like there is a line and that ‘the enemy of my enemy’ is not automatically my friend. Or, to put it another way, trans (or disabled, or gay or black or whomever) individuals are just as capable of being shitty people as anyone else and if there’s a whole instance that is largely made up of shitty individuals only capable of expressing themselves with fury and hate, the fact they are supportive of or part of minority groups is not enough to make me want to share space with them or be subjected to their methods.

        • First Majestic Comet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          expressed the intention of federating with them the moment instance level blocking works

          Ah so I take it they don’t believe the spam and hostility concerns about Hexbear users are legitimate, if they did their solution to the problem wouldn’t be “just block them lol”, it would be to keep Hexbear Censured. Though it might anyway, since the Instance blocking doesn’t seem like it’ll ever work the way anyone thinks/wants it to:

          Users can now block instances. Similar to community blocks, it means that any posts from communities which are hosted on that instance are hidden. However the block doesn’t affect users from the blocked instance, their posts and comments can still be seen normally in other communities.

          Siding with Hexbear is a red flag, considering the ammount of problems they cause from spamming to the pro-genocide propaganda they push out.

          • Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            9 months ago

            Oh no they see the spam and bullying behavior (they’ve even been on the receiving end of it) they don’t see it as a problem because they’re a “trans positive instance”.

            And the politics of the Hexbears is something they’re seemingly willing to overlook in the name of keeping trans positive communities together.

            Yeah, the admin ain’t great and the only reason I’m still hear is because the overlap in communities I want to be federated with and one’s I don’t want to be federated with currently align enough. As long as Hexbear stays defederated (and I believe Lemmygrad (almost as bad as Hexbear) is as well but IDK). But defederating with programming.dev is a big deal IMO.

            I’m curious though how our admin found out about that one thread with the admin of programming.dev. Looking in the thread I didn’t see them, but I did see a bunch of Hexbears. My guess is Hexbear in their dog piling decided to inform our admin (probably en masse) about the thread once it completely went to shit to drive a wedge to isolate our community further. Hell that thread was 2 days ago and this announcement came out only a few hours ago.

            • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Lemmygrad is a huge step up over hexbear as far as toxicity is concerned, unless you’re an outright fascist in which case they will magdump. It’s just hard to see the difference in quality because the two instances have so much overlap when it comes to thread participation.

              • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                9 months ago

                I’ve never gotten into a tiff with a lemmygrad user in a generic community. They have their convictions, but they don’t roam /all spoiling for a fight.

                The hexbears on the other hand…

    • neuracnu@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      9 months ago

      Frankly, one angry snapback and a slap fight with Hexbear doesn’t seem worth defederating over.

      I have to agree.

      The bulk of Hexbear’s userbase actively chooses to interact with others in the fediverse in antisocial ways, finding any excuse to be offended and generally make argumentative nuisances of themselves. This concerns us because they wrap themselves in trans-colored flags.

      I’m tired of Hexbear users stomping around Lemmy being jerks to everyone in the name of being trans. And I don’t want us, or this instance, to suffer for it.

      • hakase@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Right? The admin here sees hexbears engaging in their typical bad faith spam-bullying tactics against someone who, unless there’s something really bad in that deleted comment, doesn’t seem to actually be a transphobe, for the crime of enjoying a popular mainstream video game, and the admin decides to defederate the victim of the bullying.

        • CJOtheReal@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          Yeah that game brings out the worst in the “woke” people. I haven’t played it, but its definitely good from all the reviews and this whole dogfighting behavior just harms the Trans people and their “allies” and makes them seem unreasonable and annoying, wich isn’t doing them good in a rightful fight against discrimination.

      • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        To be fair, programming.dev is moderated pretty badly. This is looks like a slap fight that escalated beyond what is reasonable, but it’s a good indicator of how respectfully people over there are treated. That is, not at all.

        • Melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          I don’t know how fair that is, because things got just as bad over here when we were federated with Hexbear. They’re really active and really argumentative, so slap fights will happen and be hard to moderate.

          Maybe things are bad in general over there, but this seems like a pretty poor indicator imo. It’s hard to have a respectful discussion when you’re being dogpiled by Hexbear users.

          I’m not subscribed to any programming.dev communities, but I’ve seen programming.dev names pop up quite a bit in threads and they’ve been nothing but respectful.

          • papertowels@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            I’m just sitting here really confused at the choice to defederate based on a single chat.

            Most folks at programming.dev, myself included, are there because it’s related to their profession. That’s what drew us there.

            It baffles me to think that the entire instance has been judged and deemed unworthy because of a single comment chain that had disagreements.

            You can block users you don’t want to interact with. Some instances breed a potentially nasty sentiment or attitude, and when there are too many users from that instance to block, that’s when I’d consider defederation. But a single conversation thread, involving a single person?

            I’ve got no say in how another instance is ran. Just makes me a little sad about a much more fragmented future of Lemmy.

            • JackbyDev@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 months ago

              Fellow programming.dev user here,

              I think it’s worth checking out her comments here. I don’t think you understand why Ada made the decision. The decision is not about deeming our instance unworthy. It is about not wanting to be federated with instances with transphobic admins. It’s very different than somethingike thinking everyone on our instance is transphobic.

              I haven’t seen the removed comments so I can’t judge for myself whether they’re transphobic (and it’s not relevant to the talk you and I are having).

              • papertowels@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                It is about not wanting to be federated with instances with transphobic admins.

                I might be missing something, but I believe an admin being potentially transphobic only matters if they do not moderate transphobic content that leaks out to other instances. I don’t think I’ve seen transphobic content leak out of programming.dev.

                That said, I’ve read some of Adas comments on the intention behind defederation, and blahaj. What I’ve learned is that Blahaj wans set up as a safe space, so 0 tolerance is understandable, and is well within their rights to establish and enforce.

                Coming from someone who is just looking to Lemmy as a reddit alternative, it’s simultaneously cool that communities can do this, and a little unfortunate that with Lemmy being as small as it is (compared to reddit), we are defederating over single comment threads. Again, blahaj was intended to be a safe space and has no obligation to be a part of the “reddit replacement” I’m looking for, so if they deem it necessary then good on them.

        • Ategon@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Hey im the admin mainly in charge of the community over on programming.dev (+ the other lead admin). Can you point out a case of this happening and I can see if I need to handle it

          We moderate things in our instance if its reported but if its not reported it cant really be found easily

          (also for the main post, im chatting with your admin about it)

            • Kogasa@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              If we do defederate, which would be a massive shame, I’m willing to act like a massive dick to make you feel better about the whole thing

                • Kogasa@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  In either direction, it’s a severing of trust and degradation of user experience. That’s what I want to avoid. When I say “we defederate” I mean “our two instances become not mutually federated,” not “we [programming.dev] choose to defederate [from blahaj].”

    • spaduf@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      I left a while ago but I am disappointed to the degree that people over here are willing to carry water for hexbear. They absolutely cannot be trusted to be good faith actors.

    • CoachDom@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s the best feature of the Fediverse - you have so many options! If one instance doesn’t work for you, there WILL be one that agrees with you better.

      I’m not LGBT or Q but this is my instance because I whole heartedly support people and I appreciate that mods here do their best to separate from pure human garbage while retaining connection with like and different minded groups.

      • AnExerciseInFalling@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        It’s a great feature, but the “inter-instance politics” of it are exhausting. I’m a programmer by trade and by hobby so when creating my account I went with “the programming instance.” Now I’m hearing that because of a thread on a different instance (lemmy.ml) this instance is defederating with programming.dev.

        I like browsing the communities here, I hadn’t seen the original post on the other instance before this thread, and if I had missed this thread this whole instance would just disappear seemingly randomly.

        I get that you can migrate to another instance, but given how this is going how can I be sure this won’t happen again and I’d lose access to instances out of nowhere? It seems unsustainable to constantly check other instances for inter-instance conflicts just to see the communities I like

        I agree with separating from different minded groups, but these are the words of one person who set up the instance who definitely doesn’t speak for the “programming group.” I feel like action could be taken against the individual without basically punishing the entire instance

      • Adramis@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        It gets really tiresome to have to hop instances multiple times, though…There’s scripts you can run for it but an official way to migrate would be nice.

  • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    9 months ago

    From what I can see right now in the link thread that doesn’t seem to be nearly enough grounds for defederation from programming.dev. What am I missing?

    I’m especially confused considering it’s a thread on a lemmy.ml community. I expect community mods to mod and life goes on.

    If the admin of programming.dev is a turd when posting on other instances, I expect him to get moderated and/or blocked. Not the instance that is unrelated to the incident defederated.

      • AnExerciseInFalling@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        I guess my concern is that as a user who created their account on programming.dev, it feels like it’s coming out of nowhere. I like browsing the communities here, I hadn’t seen the original post on the other instance before this thread, and if I had missed this thread this whole instance would just disappear seemingly randomly.

        I’m a programmer by trade and by hobby so when creating my account I went with “the programming instance.” Now I’m hearing that because of a thread on a different instance (lemmy.ml) this instance is defederating with programming.dev.

        I get that you can migrate to another instance, but if decisions on defederation can be made based on the actions of one person this could definitely happen again, and I don’t make a habit of following an instance admin to make sure I agree with everything they say. It seems exhausting and unsustainable to constantly check other instances for inter-instance conflicts just to see the communities I like/want to be a part of

    • Ategon@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Hey, im actually doing a post right now with some screenshots. Should be up in a bit on meta

      (was also the one that purged the conversation. things should still be in the modlog if youre interested in digging around for it)

  • amio@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 months ago

    That conversation is really hard to follow between the hexbear emote spam (and non-emote spam), deleted comments and personal attacks.

  • Rakqoi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’m torn about this. Although I agree that the admin of that instance is being pretty transphobic and abrasive, I don’t know if it’s bad enough to defederate. In addition, I really like some of the communities there (especially the Godot community) and this might be the thing to push me off blahaj.zone…

    It’s a hard balance to strike, protecting vulnerable people from potentially harmful instances with bad policies, while at the same time, providing a valuable instance that people will want to use. Unfortunately, this will probably push me and some other individuals onto other instances that may have worse moderation and will likely expose us to a lot more bigotry. It’s a tough situation, and I honestly don’t know what the best option is.

    • brian@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      on that note, does anyone have recommendations for a neutral and controversy free instance but that also isn’t so quick to defederate?

      I understand instances like this wanting to defederate on principle and I’m sure it helps to curate a better experience for the people looking for that. Personally I’d rather make the choice myself to block communities I don’t like and leave defederation on an instance level to just blocking illegal content and poor moderation and the like.

      • hakase@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I chose lemm.ee because of how rarely it defederates, and I’m not aware of any major controversy with it. Blahaj is still federated, as is hexbear, lemmygrad, and beehaw. For those who want to curate their own instance experience, I’m not currently aware of a better home (though if anyone knows of one, definitely let me know, of course!).

          • hakase@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            ?? I was suggesting it for the user above, who specifically mentioned wanting instances that weren’t quick to defederate.

        • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I have an alt there, but there have been some availability issues lately. Is it better now?

          • hakase@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            The server was upgraded this past week actually, and I haven’t had any problems since.

        • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          ee is one of my favorite instances because their users will occasional wander into a lemmygrad thread and get shocked as shit.

      • Ategon@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        There typically will always be some form of controversy, tends to be just how the admins handle that

        I try to keep this instance federated with instances as much as reasonable (the only lemmy instances we really defederate with are burggit and rqd2 since their instance rules break our instance rules, lolicon+DMCA ignoring for the first and very questionable communities in the second (zoophilia, MAP)) and were dealing with the situation in this post internally currently to solve the situation here with blahaj. Should make a post in meta probably tomorrow

        I can give some recommendations of some instances with admins ive had positive experiences with (im one of the programming.dev leads though if that affects my stances on this)

        • startrek.website - I dont talk with these admins much but the instance tends to be pretty positively viewed across lemmy
        • slrpnk.net - one of the other niche instances. Admins seem relatively chill and I dont have anything negative regarding them. Active in helping stop spam accounts (defeds with hexbear + lemmygrad)
        • lemmings.world - has been pretty active in making tooling to help out a bunch of admins + the fediverse in general. Made uptime badges that some instances use, a linking system so you can link to something that sends people to the copy of it on their own instance, and a gui for fediseer which a bunch of admins use to keep track of defederations + endorsements (defeds with hexbear + rqd2)
    • Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Unfortunately the best option will probably be to see if the defederation takes place then if it does move instances.

      It’s a tough call but it’s starting to really seem like the right one.

      The problem will be finding a new instance, I think the solar punk one might be a good place but I have to see who they’re federated with first.

      Edit: Spleling

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    but also if i wanted a cissie’s opinions on trans issues i’d surely have asked instead of telling

    Hmm. Was this the comment ? Using ‘cis’ as a slur is how we could quickly alienate allies from our human rights issue.

  • GarfGirl [she/her]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago
    quote from the admin during the argument where he was defending his transphobia and the wizard game

    Now that I’m looking and see that you are all from hexbear it makes way more fucking sense. The actual trans people with sense are on blahaj, fucking hexbear morons invading this thread makes everything make sense now. Go touch grass.

    Ngl I’m starting to get annoyed with how transphobes on other Lemmy instances treat blahaj as like their trans best friend and use it to launder their shitty opinions just because hexbear users are more aggressive in calling out transphobia and then dogpiling whichever user said it

    • CJOtheReal@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      Hexbear isn’t calling out transpobia they use it as fighting word and make it meaningless, just like everything they do or touch.

    • Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      Do you have a link to this exchange?

      Honestly though that comment about Hexbear is pretty on point. Hexbear makes every comment thread they invade a nightmare, and is one of the goals of their instance.

        • Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          They make comment threads a nightmare for everybody not just transphobes.

          Also I couldn’t help but notice that the part you clipped out conveniently skips the whole first half where they cite instances where they defend trans people and even tell people to check their mod logs for instances where they removed antisemitism and transphobic content.

          Edit: By everybody I mean everybody that has even a slightly different opinion then them on anything.

        • Melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          I think it’s important to distinguish that they were not defending JKR, and explicitly condemned her

          • Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            9 months ago

            And also that they have made many many comments (even citing a few) supporting trans people and have removed copious amounts of content that’s transphobic and antisemitic in the past.

            They even invite people to check their mod logs.

            Yeah Garfs comment really takes things out of context

      • GarfGirl [she/her]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’ve seen it one or two times before and Ive been getting increasingly annoyed with it recently, I was even considering making a post about the general sentiment I’d seen before and then this happened.

        It usually comes up in threads when people bring up how Lemmy is predominantly dominated by cis white males, and people will respond by saying stuff like “well what about blahaj zone?” as if all the trans people on lemmy not feeling comfortable enough to join up to anywhere except the one trans specific walled garden instance reflects well on lemmy as a whole.

  • megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    Yah, it’d be one thing if they had just like… packed up their opinion on the game and dropped the whole thing, but then continuing to hammer on about it and like, straight up ignore trans people telling you that they have a problem with the game and people buying it, that’s kind of another things.

    • Fal@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      it’d be one thing if they had just like… packed up their opinion on the game and dropped the whole thing, but then continuing to hammer on about it and like

      Am I understanding you correctly, that the problem you have is that this person was responding to replies to him?

      straight up ignore trans people telling you that they have a problem with the game and people buying it, that’s kind of another things.

      And a trans person telling you they have a problem with the game, it means disagreeing is inherently transphobic?