• rockSlayer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Because he lives in the US Canada, where it’s expensive as fuck to just exist as a disabled person.

      • Stamets@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        He actually lives in Canada. Your comment still applies overall as it is not feasible to live adequately on disability here but he’s not in the US.

          • Stamets@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            11 months ago

            Canadians serving in US Prisons isn’t unheard of. We do have an extradition treaty to the US. Not one that I’m okay with as fuck being beholden to American laws while never stepping foot in the country. However he wasn’t even in Canada. He was in the Dominican Republic at the time that he was caught. He was extradited from there to the United States where he served 2 years before being released and repatriated back to Canada.

      • schmidtster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Person is in Canada and has disability insurance as well as government benefits. Unless the articles are wrong in saying disability insurance.

        Still don’t see how it’s relevant to the story about being fined. Would be the same story for anyone disability or not.

        • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          OP corrected me, and I edited my comment to reflect the correction. Still don’t see how it’s weird to be upset about a company fining the everliving fuck out of a private citizen because the company is anti-ownership.

          • schmidtster@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Because this group actively endorsed and profited from piracy. They made it a job instead of a hobby. Don’t profit from it, that’s like the one thing you don’t do, and they did it.

            Not really a private citizen anymore at that point if you’re making a business.

            • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              11 months ago

              Ok, so Nintendo should sue the group/company he was a part of and not the individual. The device was for hacking/modding. The fact that pirates used it too is incidental. Nintendo ships games in which you can’t even play 4/5 of the game due to a game breaking bug. The only way to access the rest of the game is to mod your ds to get past the bug. There’s also software preservation aspects so we don’t lose our digital history.

              Honestly, fuck Nintendo. You don’t own software even if you buy it, so I’d argue that it’s not theft to use software without paying. But I digress.