• Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    9 hours ago

    A doctor would be able to provide a higher level of care than a medic, because of all the experience in medical school.

    Medics don’t need degrees in medicine, just a paramedic program which is only 20 months. Ie the same length as the first post secondary requirement to medical school.

    • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Nope. If you are down in the field 99% of the time you want a good medic.
      If you need your blood drawn, you want a good phlebotomist. People are good at what they practice. Doctors are great in their environment, but it’s not like they are better at doing the jobs of other medical professionals.

      • Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        You got me, but without a kit I don’t think prior experience with gunshot wounds would make up for the time lost waiting on the second person. And it’s not like this was an either/or. It’s completely asinine to not let the doctor that is standing right there access to someone actively bleeding. Even the most casual assessment would save the paramedic on their way a minute and would have the attempts to stop the bleeding happen minutes earlier. That’s not a trivial amount of time. This level of negligence is homicide