Also, don’t leave your account unused, delete it. User and follower numbers count.

And least as important, reply (if necessary to another corporate mail address) every email with Twitter/X in the footer, with a kind request to stop promoting and facilitating X.

https://bio.link/everyonehateselon

  • bigmamoth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 minutes ago

    Lest be honnest 30 second. Nothing is equivalent to twitter at the time. While i love the fediverse it doesnt have the massive userbase that make it great. It s really funny that you tried to frame it as a social media with built in child abuse tool. Pretty sure child dont have the right to create an account on it and it doesnt have the same effect as instagram has on child. Also totally agree thta making his dumb bot with this capability was stupid but let s be honest, in every way you can do that on any other platform, and i feel it learned at least some numeric hygiene to some ppl.

  • KelvarCherry@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 hours ago

    What if we start referring to 𝕏 as “that child porn site” in a mainly neutral tone? Would that normalize it? I’d hope it would make people look inwards, but idk if 𝕏philes in 2026 have that capacity.

    • Europellinore@europe.pubOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      You could tell him that X isn’t cool anymore. That Bsky (or mastodon) is the new Twitter, but without the 90% trolls and without the advertisements every other 3 posts

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      17 hours ago

      In case someone thinks “Oh, he’s just an alt-right troll, he doesn’t actually believe in that stuff”, meet Elon’s grandfather:

      He became involved in Canadian politics, backing the technocracy movement, before moving to South Africa in 1950. Over the course of decades, Haldeman repeatedly expressed racist, antisemitic, and antidemocratic views.[1] In South Africa he was a supporter of apartheid and promoted a number of conspiracy theories.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joshua_N._Haldeman

        • merc@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          12 hours ago

          This in turn would necessitate the abandonment of democracy and the embrace of a technocracy—government by an unelected, technically skilled, empirically-driven elite with the expertise necessary to determine values and make rational resource-allocation decisions

          Sounds a lot like one of Elon’s beliefs, doesn’t it?

          Strange how people who think this way never assume they’ll be one of the people on the outside, letting others make the important decisions. Whenever there’s an elite, they imagine they’ll be part of that elite.

  • Zozano@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    “Won’t somebody think of the children?!” “Wait, no! Not like that!”

    • Europellinore@europe.pubOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      22 hours ago

      That’s true, but Bluesky is also 100 times better than X and probably a more feasible/realistic alternative for all kinds of companies/sports clubs/government agencies/etc. Although I prefer Mastodon in principle, I am quite sceptical about the chance that it will be seen (by the general public) as such a good alternative to X that they will actually consider themselfs being able to leave X.

      • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        The problem with Bluesky is that it has exactly the same kind of legal structure (for-profit company) with the same kind of objective (make lots of money for founders and early investors) as Twitter, thus is just as likely to be bought by a Nazi billionaire.

        If you’re leaving X because it turned into a Nazi bar after being bought by a Nazi, going to Bluesky is just setting yourself up for being in a similar situation again in a couple of years.

      • alfredon996@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        38
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        The problem with Bluesky is that it’s essentially centralized, with all the related drawbacks.

        • merc@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          And its funding is pretty suspect.

          Even if you trust the current leadership team, there’s no reason to believe they’ll remain in charge.

      • bossito@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Repeating mistakes, taking years to drop a platform owned by a nazi to just run into the next US platform ready to be bought by some other billionaire Nazi… nothing was learnt, was it?

      • Telorand@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        21 hours ago

        For those of us with the knowledge, it’s our responsibility to both sell the idea of Mastodon and help onboard people. On top of that, there’s many guides, at this point, about how to get involved, choose an instance, set up your feeds, etc.

        It’s true that Bluesky is a much more seamless experience, because many options are hardcoded or pre-chosen for people, but if we can get people over the hump of making those choices for themselves, they’ll find it a much better place long term. Also, it’s strongly resistant to the antics of bad actors, so it’s a much better choice for governments and other groups. Bluesky does not enjoy the same natural defenses.

      • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Personally at this point I’m looking at it even more generally: anybody whose Morality is such that they’re OK with the mass murdering of children in Gaza by Zionist for the “crime” of being Palestinian (the list of just babies 1 year old or younger killed by the Israelis just in the first 3 months of the Genocide is 17 pages long) isn’t going to Morally be above “merelly” using little children for sexual pleasure or more broadly the use of violence to force other human beings to do what you want that’s the core of Fascist thinking, especially the Nazi kind.

        I guess what I’m trying to say is that somebody who justifies and supports any one form of extreme Evil is going to at the very least be uncaring in the face of other forms of extreme Evil.

  • NoiseColor @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Who? A lot of people apparently. And basically all companies. And more or less all government institutions in all countries in the world.

    • Europellinore@europe.pubOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Since few weeks I’m replying to all mails with X in the footer (newsletters as well as email signature of corporate mails) to tell them it would be great if they stop promoting this crappy outlet. Concise, polite and motivated.

      From roughly half of them I didn’t get a reply yet. From the other half, a MAJORITY reacts positive. We all should know, the MAIN reason most organizations are still there, is because someone decided so in 2010 (!). They never thought about it afterward, because their audience / customer ‘never asks for that’.

      Be. That. Customer / Reader. Who. DOES. Ask. For. That.

      • PostaL@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        You’re basically asking them to give up on a promotion avenue and hence a revenue source in favor of morals. Corporations will never do this unless leaving X somehow financially outweighs staying there.

        • Europellinore@europe.pubOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Financially, or when their customers require so, or when damaging to their image. At least the latter two are quite influenceable.

        • Europellinore@europe.pubOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          18 hours ago

          I wouldn’t. Not because I don’t think it’s a good idea, but I want to let them see that specifically X became a disgusting fascist deepfake childporn abyss. Adding fb as well, increases the risk they don’t quit any of them, because it might give them the illusion my message says more about me ‘being anti social media’ rather than about X in particular.

          • Crackhappy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            17 hours ago

            I see your point. I’m not certain that I agree with you, but I understand what you’re saying.

    • J92@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      21 hours ago

      If nobody was doing it, it would be a strange thing to pay money to put in an advertising space.

      • NoiseColor @lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        It is a strange thing to put money into it, considering not even csam is enough to make at least eu institutions to go away from x.

        Seems like musk can do anything he wants. What’s worse than this?

        • J92@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          21 hours ago

          I’d argue putting it into people’s field of view could sway an individual, and if one person can be moved, more could follow.

          That side already proved that boycotting works, in their disgust of a trans-indivual advertising beer, and certain groups being mortally offended that folk could suggest BDS actions towards Israel.

  • Niquarl@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I forgot if I still had an account. Yep but haven’t used it since covid probably. Deactivated it just now, guess it will delete in 30days.

  • joostjakob@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Hadn’t used my account in years. But deleted it now. It seems unlikely that the old Twitter will ever return.

  • Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I Canada we still have “left” parties publishing on X. I wrote to them I wont be voting for a party that use a platform run by and for nazis. Just for fun, I actually ask a LLM if using X was indirectly supporting the white supremacists and it agreed that it was lol. Someone should ask Grok.