Read the article to see if he makes any valid point, couldn’t find one.
When 90% of the messaging is all around the end of the world and the pessimism, and I think we’re scaring people from making the investments in AI that makes it safer, more functional, more productive, and more useful to society," he said.
So, I was about to invest some money to make AI safer, to avert it’s dangers, but now somebody warned me about those dangers, so now I am scared to make the investments to make it safer. That makes a lot of sense /s
Seems to me it’s not investments into AI safety you’re worried about, it’s the investments into the potentially dangerous service you’re worried about.
Its hilarious how hard tech bros are panicking over underwhelming AI revenue after they bet the entire economy on it.
Please stop being negative about AI, it hurts my company if you don’t all love our shit!
Your feelings and opinions are affecting our bottom line. Obviously it’s you that’s the problem here.
I’m sorry, what’s market research again? That sounds old-school and not involving AI.
You know what would help society? If you spent all those billions on climate protection and clean energy, creating new jobs and a better future instead of causing the complete opposite effects.
You, fucking billionaires, are the ones doing ALL the damage and it’s time for your heads to roll down the guillotine.
These guys project like crazy.
Maybe if my entire team of 120 wasn’t laid off to automatization I would be less sour. Ass.
Let me rewrite that: Man who makes trillions manufacturing Ai hardware, says “people expressing how shitty Ai is and how it makes life harder” is going to cause me to lose money.
Are there gangs of people following this guy around and berating him non-stop? because he deserves that
Look we’ve only got so many berating gangs to go around, they’re very busy.
Oh fuck off with that. Y’all are promoting the technology with the promise of replacing human jobs. What did you think the response would be?
That is not to mention building it by literally stealing the wealth of human thought and then being surprised that we’re mad you want to sell it back to us with brand new monthly fees. Fuck off with all of that.
All AI models should be required to be open sourced to compensate humanity for this theft of our labor and ideas.
They’re taking care of that for you. Without ads, they don’t have enough income to stay afloat. With ads, they can’t compete with open source models.
I would have a lot less negativity around AI if the mag 7 and all AI companies agreed to sign a contract to be nationalized once they have automated a significant amount of jobs, with their profits to be used for a national basic income. I would be much more positive in that case, Jensen. Give it some thought.
…but–but that would be COMMUNISM!!! 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭
/s
Maybe do less harm with it. May less people actively dislike it then. Usefulness aside.
“Won’t somebody think of the CEOs?”
Says the guy who runs a 4,9 trillion dollar company mainly because of AI, what damage? WTF!
Just buy a 5090 bro. Maybe two. Look at this leather jacket.
No, Jensen, you got that backwards, GenAI itself is hurting society and has done a lot of damage, the active and well-deserved pushback against it ain’t hurting anyone.
Your grift is what’s killing the world, asshole.
Damn tootin.
