• postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    45 minutes ago

    Text of the Foreign Emoluments Clause, U.S. Const. art. I, § 9, cl. 8.

    “No Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under [the United States], shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.”

  • Tronn4@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    5 hours ago

    When this era of terror is over, I hope we have Nuremberg style trials for all these wastes of humans. From the white house to the lawmakers who sat idly by and let this country falter, to the ice agents “just following orders”. And I hope we dismantle everything trump. No courts. No mercy. Globally. Cancel every contract they have given themselves and their friends. Corrupt judges out. End this Christian fascism. Every Trump aligned son of a bitch and bitch delta with

    • Bullerfar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      53 minutes ago

      You are dreaming. USA did this TWICE. There is no turning back from this. The People of the USA seems to forget a lot in 4 years. So who will the next trump be, once the egg prices goes up again? USA will never be trusted again. They are in catagory with Russia and china.

    • reddit_sux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      There had to be a World War for Nuremberg to happen. What my fear is instead of World War there will be a World Civil war.

      • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        40 minutes ago

        I just thought about ww2, and I just realized how egregious it is that the Japanese and Italians sided with Nazis.

        They thought “yes, mhm, we are on that side”.

      • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        42 minutes ago

        What is a “world civil war” and how is that different from a world war?

        My understanding is that a “civil war” is a war within a country, for the dominance and rulership of that country, usually over ideals or laws or something. And a world war is just… a worldwide war. I wish my grandparents were still around to seek real advice on this, I truly miss them and their experience and wisdom.

        • reddit_sux@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          37 minutes ago

          They will be factions within countries fighting amongst each other. There maybe alliances amongst those factions but no nations against each other. The end an apocalyptic fragments of Nations

  • verdi@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    6 hours ago

    America was always a nazi shithole, we just didn’t care because they made our elite rich and it was only brown people who were getting fucked over it.

    Welcome to reality my frieds, a portion of us have been here for a long time. Kissinger should have been the only canary needed to see it, yet, here we are…

    • Zozano@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      45 minutes ago

      America was always a Nazi shithole, but nobody noticed until they got online, and their cultural blindspot (education), made them afraid of anything new or different - including critical thinking, which the Russians exploited.

  • saimen@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    10 hours ago

    He’s spiraling into a singularity of narcissistic terror over [Jeffrey] Epstein, and decompensating with performative dictatoring

    Couldn’t have said it better.

    • anon_8675309@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 hours ago

      He’s over Epstein. He decided fuck it, he’s going for total power so that whatever is said about Epstein he can just ¯\_(ツ)_/¯.

    • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I’m not convinced he cares that much about Epstein. As far as not liking anything that makes him look bad, sure. But he’s sending out armed thugs to murder Americans and getting away with it. Why should he care about being outed as a pedophile?

      • Drusas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 hours ago

        There must be something that he considers embarrassing, so obviously not pedophilia.

          • tomiant@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            6 hours ago

            He doesn’t feel embarrassment, but he hates when other people don’t constantly sing his praises. Being a pedo subtracts from the cheering throngs. By a frighteningly small margin.

            • Drusas@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              5 hours ago

              I think it needs to be something like him getting a blowjob from a man (or boy). That is something much of his base might consider unforgivable.

              But also maybe something like being peed or shat or cummed on.

        • DonorTissue@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I heard something about his involvement in the case of a “disappeared” associate in Moscow, with that being Putins kompromat on him.

  • Chivera@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    158
    ·
    12 hours ago

    If he’s the president of Venezuela then let’s open up the border to them. Let them come in they’re American now.

    • worhui@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      80
      ·
      9 hours ago

      This is actually a good argument .

      The president of the USA can not be head of state of a different country. So they are either Americans or Donald trump accidentally abdicated the presidency.

      • AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Is there anything explicitly forbidding it? I can’t say I recall anything specific about it, but I admit I could be just forgetting a constitutional clause or something.

          • CircaV@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 hour ago

            LOL the emoluments clause means nothing to Trump et al. He’s so bribed. It’s beyond fathom.

        • ryven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          36
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.

          He cannot “accept … [an] Office … from any … foreign State.” I suppose he might argue that “accepting” and “seizing by force” are not the same thing.

          Or Congress could pass an act to allow it.

          Edit: Or, more realistically, someone will complain to the Supreme Court and they’ll find a reason to avoid ruling on the issue and Sotomayor will write an angry dissent but nothing will change.

          • tomiant@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            6 hours ago

            Argue? Why would he argue? He says it, it happens, nobody has a choice but to accept it, the legal system is defunct. We are living in upside down clown world now. The clown has his own Gestapo and nukes. Fucker needs to be taken out like week old fish in the bin.

  • goferking (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I was told here though that it was perfectly fine what he did and totally didn’t take over the government because he didn’t put the noble peace prize winner into power

  • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    246
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    The lines between Hitler and Trump are becoming less and less blurred

    • Null User Object@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I think you mean more blurred, not less.

      A less blurred line would be more distinct, providing a stronger, more obvious separation between the two.

      A more blurred line is fuzzier, making it more difficult to tell where one ends and the other starts.

    • qyron@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      13 hours ago

      If the man was still alive, he would be salivating for what it is being done right now. It’s the original agenda, on steroids, revised, fine tuned and turbo charged.

      • Vedlt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        When he was elected I was very scared that my son would be old enough to be conscripted and die in a pointless war based on the time line compared to original Hilter.

        Good news though! Looks like he won’t even get to live to see 10 years old! 👍

        • qyron@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          We’ll live to be old and so will our offspring. How the world will be by then is the great question.

    • rizzothesmall@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I get what you’re saying from the context, but the way you phrases it makes it sound like it’s becoming more clearly defined that Trump is not Hitler. Generally, more “blurring of the lines” equates to a thing becoming less clearly distinguishable from another thing.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        If one circle is blurry, it can look like a Venn diagram.

        As it gets more focused, it looks like the Venn just overlaps more than it did originally.

        Then one day, everyone’s like “wait a minute, it’s been a single blurry circle the whole time” and everyone can see it.

        It’s not common usage now, but has before. So maybe they switched it up on accident, but if it was intentuonal then it wasn’t necessarily wrong. They just meant as the differences get more defined, we realize they aren’t really differences.

    • venusaur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Much like Argentina was a safe haven for Nazi’s, Trump is making Venezuela a safe haven for him and his mob.

  • Danarchy@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    111
    ·
    13 hours ago

    It is often said that to truly be president of a place you must walk among the people unguarded to show that you’re in charge and not a big wuss

  • BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    134
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    14 hours ago

    We better do NOTHING AT ALL about This! Not even a SLIGHTLY Stern Letter!

    -World Leaders Apparently! And Democrats!