ickplant@lemmy.world to Fuck AI@lemmy.world · 9 days agoGeniuslemmy.worldimagemessage-square69fedilinkarrow-up1771arrow-down17
arrow-up1764arrow-down1imageGeniuslemmy.worldickplant@lemmy.world to Fuck AI@lemmy.world · 9 days agomessage-square69fedilink
minus-squareDrew@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·9 days agonah, training data is not why it answered this (otherwise it would have training data from many different years, way more than of 2025)
minus-squarequeermunist she/her@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up5·edit-28 days agoThere’s data weights for recency, so after a certain point “next year is 2026” will stop being weighted over “next year is 2027” It’s early in the year, so that threshold wasn’t crossed yet.
minus-square0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·9 days agoMaybe it uses the most recent date in the dataset for its reference to datetime?
nah, training data is not why it answered this (otherwise it would have training data from many different years, way more than of 2025)
There’s data weights for recency, so after a certain point “next year is 2026” will stop being weighted over “next year is 2027”
It’s early in the year, so that threshold wasn’t crossed yet.
Maybe it uses the most recent date in the dataset for its reference to datetime?