You must log in or register to comment.
So “abducted”?
“Captured”, “apprehended” - same shit they use for drug dealer stories.
Captured maybe. Apprehended has the assumption of legal right of capture for justice, and while he is being tried right now, is it the US’s jurisdiction to do so? I don’t think people would be so upset about how it was done if there are legal justifications.
Extraordinary rendition
Fuckers…
The BBC is the Pinocchio of brown nosing. Every lie they tell and truth they twarth their nose gets deeper into the fart birth canal of trump
I’d totally agree if the reason was that it was clearly a war crime. Alas, it’s just their higher ups are cool with this whole farce.
it’s okay.
