How the fuck is AI person of the year?

  • 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Technically they gave it to “The architects of AI”

    And also worth knowing Time person of the year isn’t necessarily someone who did something good, just who they deem to have had the biggest impact

    Hitler got it once I believe

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 days ago

      And while AI in various forms has been building up for a few years, 2025 was definitely when it became a thing. It parallels “(AI) slop” being voted word of the year. Which is a fascinating bending of the word, as the sloppiness of AI in writing and particularly images was obvious slop when it first began, but now can be far too convincing in short bursts now. It’s also been broadened to mean “I don’t believe, like, and/or care about this” as a short drive-by comment, even on real things.

  • Diddlydee@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    5 days ago

    It’s not AI though. It’s the architects of it.

    It’s also not a good person contest and is solely based on prominence.

  • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    After Hitler, Stalin, Nixon and Trump: let’s take the meaninglessness of this reward to its logical conclusion.

    • Signtist@bookwyr.me
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Technically it’s not meant to be a positive thing - just a neutral acknowledgement of a topic’s media dominance for that year, but yeah, The phrase “X of the year” is so universally understood to be positive that even with the reminder that it’s not an award, it still feels like an award.