• Taldan@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Considering the human eye is basically backwards, I always found it funny people would try to use it as an example of an intelligent creator

    Like we seriously have all the working bits in the path of light, permanently blocking our vision in spots. We just hide it with some post-production brain magic, and I’m supposed to believe that’s evidence of an intelligent creator?

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Dawkins’ book “Climbing Mount Improbable” is a great and easy read to introduce the idea of making something complex and seemingly designed for its purpose a much more probable thing to happen if broken into small changes over huge amounts of time. And it’s like 30 years old, so probably outdated with more and better evidence now.

      There is an old Youtube video by cdk007 (that’s still up!) that tackles a related fallacy, where finding a watch on the beach implies a watchmaker because nothing complex can evolve. He created a simulation using watch parts and evolutionary rules to show complexity does arise with the right conditions and enough time.

    • ViatorOmnium@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      15 hours ago

      When the bible says “created in god’s image” it was originally talking about octopus, it just got mixed up in transcription at some point.