• Broadfern@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    10 days ago

    That’s like one month of US health insurance next year. Way more than worth it over being at the whims of some fuckhead corporation

    • XM34@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      In the civilised world (Aka everywhere but the US), it is!

      • buttnugget@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        People who refer to anywhere but the US as civilized should be stuffed into a canon and shot into a brick wall.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      10 days ago

      It costs you 700 now and it costs them an unknown amount in the future. They just don’t like it because they suspect it’ll be quite a lot more than the 700 that you’re paying to join. They’re right too.

      But union dues are annoying in the moment, because when it happens all you see is a reduction in your pay and initially no change in working conditions. That’s why they have posters like that up, because even though intellectually people understand that being in a union will long-term result in better pay, in the short term it does effectively result in a temporary pay cut, which can be hard if you’re already not really very well paid.

      If you’re joining an established union sometimes they will be smart and not charge members until they’ve renegotiated their salaries. But that only happens if you’re joining a already formed union.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        Lots of jobs that need unions are jobs that people don’t want to be working in a few years, because they’re terrible jobs with minimal benefits and shit pay. Those people can’t see that the reason the job is so shitty is because there isn’t a union. There’s a good chance that they’d actually want to stay with the job once the union transforms the working conditions and compensation.

        Lots of people would be satisfied with a career in a “lesser” job like retail if the job didn’t suck. There’s nothing wrong with being a cashier, cook, custodian, phone attendant, etc for your whole working life if that’s what you want to do, and we should compensate people in those jobs accordingly.

    • Woht24@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      10 days ago

      No it’ll cost you, it comes out of your after tax wage. But it’s an investment into you and your colleagues futures for better wages, stronger protections and benefits.

        • FishFace@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 days ago

          What do you mean, “get them back”? Do you mean, “pay less tax by listing them as an expense”? Because you still have to pay for them, just not as much.

          • Kirp123@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 days ago

            Yes you pay less tax up to a yearly cap. The yearly cap for 2025 and 2026 is 1100 dollars. So if I was in the Union listed in the image here and had to pay 700 dollars then I would list it on my tax form and pay 700 dollars less on my taxes that year.

            • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              9 days ago

              I think it’s word choice that caused confusion here. In the US at least, “deduction” means you don’t have to pay taxes on it, not that you get back the full amount that you paid. What you’re talking about would be called a tax credit.

            • xartle@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 days ago

              I didn’t know that. That feels like something this administration will cancel on a random Thursday…

      • mirshafie@europe.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 days ago

        The protections are key here. I’d take a slightly lower wage for a healthy work environment any day, and I know that most people agree.

        • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          10 days ago

          Also if the company refuses and hires scabs you can always put the money towards hiring union enforcers. Mind you we aren’t quite there again but I don’t we’re too far off either, showing up to a scabs home at 2AM to have a nice talk or ambushing the boss on his way home. The glory days may be long gone but I hope to see new glory forged.

          • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            10 days ago

            What really works is when unions start being powerful enough to dictate governmental policy. That’s when things really improve. Of course the millionaires and billionaires will complain about interference, because it’s only good when they do it.

  • bebabalula@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    10 days ago

    Two questions:

    1. Is this for real?
    2. Does it work?

    I feel like a large company going to that kind of effort to explicitly tell me to not spend money on something would have the exact opposite effect. It’s not like they’re saying “unions are bad, actually” it just like “this thing you were going to spend money on, maybe don’t?”

    Imagine a poster saying “Drugs are really expensive - you’ll get more value for money if you buy videogames” - would that work?

  • hateisreality@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    9 days ago

    Haha my Union Dues… 240/yr.

    Pay in the five years before the union…no increase. 20 years of union, pay up 100%.

  • FosterMolasses@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    10 days ago

    Scumbags. What the hell is this 'murkin propaganda? It’s like the whole country is unironically trying to become the Sith.

  • Sharlot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    9 days ago

    Classic misdirection: compare dues to a toy instead of the extra pay, healthcare, and protections.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 days ago

      This is why corporate America wants our population uneducated and tuned out and hooked on AI slop and distractions.

    • YeahIgotskills2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 days ago

      Utterly hellish. In the UK, which is very far from being a Utopia, this would be almost unthinkable. Real Black Mirror stuff. Sure, the companies may not want you to join the union, but to actively advertise against it is breathtakingly shitty.

  • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    10 days ago

    When I worked at Best buy over 10 years ago they had the exact same propaganda. You know instead of union dues you could buy an Xbox! (From us no less!)

    …okay I added that last bit but it was implied

      • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        10 days ago

        Many years ago I had to explain to a coworker how progressive taxation works. He was like “that’s a great idea! We should do that! It’s stupid that now your pay goes up but you take home less because you get taxed more”

        I had to tell him, yes it is a good idea. It’s how it works now. You don’t get more pay and suddenly your whole income is taxed more.

        He’d had no idea

        • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          10 days ago

          I’ve literally heard coworkers mention the whole “I actually don’t want a raise because my taxes would go up and I’d make less” bullshit before. I do what I can to redirect them when I hear it, but some people are extremely dug into their worldview and don’t want to be helped. Like acknowledging a progressive tax rate would require acknowledging that their entire concept of income and taxation is built on a lie.

        • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 days ago

          I had an outright argument with one of my own coworkers about this very subject less than six months ago. Even with all of the insane bullshit going on outside today people still just refuse to look up and read any sort of information for themselves.

  • Otakulad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    9 days ago

    Remember, if your company is telling you how great something is, it is great for them, not you.

    • Overconfidentiality@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      Right, if you ever see an poster or video anywhere, consider that the message was something someone felt was worth spending money on. And if it was a business, why would a business spend money unless it could somehow benefit its bottom line?