A ruling in the president’s favor in the case, which deals with his attempt to remove a member of the Federal Trade Commission, would be a major expansion of presidential authority.

  • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Congress can remove a justice with a majority vote in the house and a 2/3 supermajority in the Senate. This means you can’t actually remove a judge unless they lose support from within their own party, and the Republicans have shown that they wont go along with removal no matter what.

    This means that in practice, the path forward is to add additional judges, so that the Republicans are a minority, and unable to do any damage.

    • santa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      What if they want to remove one as an “official act”?

      I think this is all horrible, but I really want them to eat their own dog food.