• uselessartifact@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Taken from the what you’ll learn in this article section at the top:

      1. Fossilized footprints in Saudi Arabia show human traffic on the cusp of a subsequent ice age.
      2. Like carbon dating, scientists use isotopes and context clues to calculate the approximate age of fossils.
      3. These human prints were surrounded by animals but not hunted animals, indicating humans were just thirsty.
      • dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        19 hours ago

        3. These human prints were surrounded by animals but not hunted animals, indicating humans were just thirsty.

        Uh… Thirsty for what? 😬

        • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago
          • Thirsty - feeling thirst
          • Thirst - a sensation of dryness in the mouth and throat associated with a desire for liquids, also : the bodily condition (as of dehydration) that induces this sensation

          Jokes aside, why does everybody feel the need to gravitate towards the least popular definition here?

          • dumnezero@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Humans have been around, as a species, for 0.3 million years (approximately). The most recent 10,000 years are not a statistically representative sample of humans.

  • Hegar@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    19 hours ago

    given the fossil and archeological evidence for the spread of H. sapiens into the Levant and Arabia during [the era 130,000 to 80,000 years ago] and absence of Homo neanderthalensis from the Levant at that time, we argue that H. sapiens was responsible for the tracks at Alathar.

    Scientists: Since we already know H. Sapiens was here then, we think they did it.

    Headline: Human footprints shouldn’t be here then!

  • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    19 hours ago

    The linked Popular Mechanics article cites this Smithsonian article.

    The Smithsonian article cites this National Geographic article and this Science Advances article (among others).

    The National Geographic article is paywalled.

    The Science Advances research article seems to be the original source—here’s the abstract:

    The nature of human dispersals out of Africa has remained elusive because of the poor resolution of paleoecological data in direct association with remains of the earliest non-African people. Here, we report hominin and non-hominin mammalian tracks from an ancient lake deposit in the Arabian Peninsula, dated within the last interglacial. The findings, it is argued, likely represent the oldest securely dated evidence for Homo sapiens in Arabia. The paleoecological evidence indicates a well-watered semi-arid grassland setting during human movements into the Nefud Desert of Saudi Arabia. We conclude that visitation to the lake was transient, likely serving as a place to drink and to forage, and that late Pleistocene human and mammalian migrations and landscape use patterns in Arabia were inexorably linked.