If you can historically re-enact the 1890s, can you do the 1990s? Where does it end?

  • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Define “legitimate”.

    If you want to go for comedic reenactment, Saturday Night Live does it for events within a week.

  • zxqwas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 hours ago

    There is no hard line, just what you yourself would feel silly reenacting.

    So just brush the dust off that office beige PC and CRT monitor and have a lan party with your friends.

    • planish@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I feel like it would be kind of silly to reenact, like, the 1980s. Or, even though it was hugely historical, the Vietnam War. It was terrible and people who had to deal with it are still alive; what would be the point of trying to show people what it was like? Do people really have trouble imagining what life was like in the 1980s? Wasn’t it basically like now, unlike, say, the 1890s?

      • _deleted_@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Do people really have trouble imagining what life was like in the 1980s? Wasn’t it basically like now?

        Society was very different in many ways:

        • Personal computers were only just starting to become common. The Apple Macintosh launched in 1984, the IBM PC a few years before. There was no Microsoft Windows, no Linux. If you didn’t type your paperwork yourself, most large workplaces had a typing pool to do it for you
        • There was no Internet. If you wanted to send a message to someone, you could write a letter and post it, or phone them, or send a telegram
        • mobile phones were uncommon, and usually only in cars
        • the Sony Walkman had only just come out in 1979, and you listened to your music on cassettes
        • cancer, AIDS, heart conditions were almost always untreatable and terminal within years, if not months
        • US involvement in the Middle East and Afghanistan hadn’t happened yet. Britain had a war with Argentina in the Falkland Islands. Ireland was still fighting with Britain
        • LA Law and Miami Vice were considered cool
  • lime@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    For this example, I would loosely define an event or item as historical if it was characteristic to a recognizable time period that people can instantly associate it with, or if it evokes feelings of nostalgia.

    • palordrolap@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      This. Anything that’s recognisably from a previous era, even if it’s just a hairstyle or a fashion trend, can be a re-enactment of that era if someone knowingly and willingly chooses to style themselves that way.

  • DomeGuy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    If we’re talking re-enacting the way the folks who wear historish costumes and blank-fire muskets at each other mean it, then the cutoff is “whatever the last war was fought locally and then ended.”

    If you mean it the way the folks who wear even sillier costumes, drink, and walk around with swords mean it, then the cutoff is “whenever the clothes we want to wear were last plausibly worn.”

    If you mean it the way a TV reporter, producer, or academic might mean it, however, there’s no cutoff beyond “isn’t happening now.”. (There’s a famous story about someone who won the lottery after playing on a whim, was egged on by a reporter to re-enact buying the ticket, and won again.)