• Formfiller@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Shareholders don’t need to make profits anymore because they literally own everything and are actively participating in a coup to keep it that way.

  • Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    “Product hoarding” conflicts with wealth hoarding. The only logical solution is to make less durable products that quickly wear out with frequent use.

    That way consumers are forced to spend more and contribute more to the hoarded wealth of individuals who know very well they won’t be able to spend their fortunes before they die. However their desire for more and more wealth to hoard is limitless because it acts as a useless status symbol amongst other wealth hoarders.

    When consumers become concerned about skyrocketing cost of living and wealth inequality, the wealth hoarders will remind them they’re lazy and greedy. If they didn’t want to be poor they should have worked harder (like them) or been more careful not to spend all their money on “frivolous purchases.”

    However if consumers don’t spend enough money on frivolous purchases, they’re not being smart, they’re “product hoarding.” When consumers don’t have money to spend, but the wealth hoarders continue to churn out shitty products that they know nobody will buy, the economy will collapse.

    The wealth hoarders could afford to take the hit. It might even help them understand cause and effect, so they don’t just keep making the same mistakes in the future. They could even use some of their hoarded wealth to get themselves out of the hole they dug by just giving it to the consumers to spend on their own products. But instead, they’re usually just given a bailout because they’re too big to fail.

    After all, the economy would collapse without them…

    • groet@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Linux is famously both American and Corporate /s

      But yeah sytsem76 and valve are both american and valve is corporate. And around Lemmy you would think they are the only ones responsible for the Linux boom.

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        It’s a little bit of both of those nowadays with all the corporate maintainers and the fact that the Linux Foundation is headquartered in the US and Torvalds lives in the US too

        But really it’s still a global effort

    • krooklochurm@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Hannah Montana Linux can run code on time itself and create whatever you want from nothing.

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      10 hours ago

      This single diagram really tells you all you ever need to know. And yet a lot of people in the bottom 50% think that the gays or refugees are to blame for their problems.

    • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      The only point here, as always, is that everybody and anybody who thinks that this chart and only this chart is what matters, is objectively a fucking idiot who has disqualified their own opinion, along with those implying it is a real, serious opinion, which it is not.

      • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        LBJ wanted to have social spending and have a massive knockout punch in Vietnam. Instead of a knockout punch, the War turned into a massive quagmire. It was costing the US a fortune, but LBJ didn’t want to raise taxes, so he printed money. Nixon got elected and doubled down on the War and using inflation to pay for it. Then the OPEC oil embargo hit and inflation went through the roof.

        Jimmy Carter’s plan [controlled by Fed chair Paul Volker] solved inflation, but by the time it kicked in Carter had been replaced by Reagan. Reagan deregulated a lot of industries and let them run wild.

        In 1968, ‘middle class’ was defined as one Union job supporting a family of four. At that time $1 million was a vast fortune. By the time Bush Sr. was out, ‘middle class’ meant two incomes to run the home, and $1 million was what a rich guy paid for a party.

        • tomiant@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Whenever you want to understand the state of the USA, consider George Bush, president, father of George Bush, president.

          We’re a fucking Middle Eastern dynastic fiefdom, with fucking nukes.

          • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 hours ago

            The funny thing is that Bush Dr. castigated Reagan’s tax cuts as ‘voo-doo economics’ when they were running against each other in the primaries. Once Reagan won the nomination, Bush signed on whole heartedly

      • tomiant@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I sometimes ask people, “Do you think that in 500 years, capitalism will still govern the world? Is capitalism the last system we will ever see, and is it the single best system humanity as a species could possibly come up with?”

        And they are just dumbfounded and don’t know what to say, because they can’t even imagine the concept of an alternative.

        • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Well, capitalism has been around for thousands of years so I don’t see why it would simply just disappear in the next 500.

  • Zier@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Well that’s good news. Now I can finally relax. I’m going to go lay down in my back yard, that is nothing but dry dirt, and stare up at the pollution clouds in the sky. Good time, good times.

    • tomiant@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Oooh look at Mr. Fancy over here with a dry dirt yard and pollution clouds in the sky! We used to dreeeeam about dry dirt yards and pollution clouds, instead we were happy in our pit of acid rain, and we didn’t complain, either!