Well… Just goes to show, we all need each other’s help to balence things.
Also, who wants loose liberal women everywhere? Honestly, I dont want to marry someone with more partners than I can count on one hand… I dont think im crazy here? Cuz liberal women usually have many past lovers, in comparison to conservative women, in general…
Over all, I find these graphs very positive. And I think things are starting to turn around. A lot of women these days realize that their grandmothers had a lot less pressure and a lot more freedom. Sure, there was more pressure to have babies, but there was much less pressure about getting a degree and a career. Women are looking back and realizing “homemaker” was an enviable position, usually.
I long for those days ive never seen. Where a guy can get an entry level position and make enough to support his family on that single income. Why did that stop? Why is nearly every household a “dual-income” house? In a large part, it is because of the feminist movement. Women wanted things to be equal in the work force, and they did. Now things, like rent, are WAY more expensive because they assume most house holds are dual income.
Honestly, I dont want to marry someone with more partners than I can count on one hand… I dont think im crazy here?
I actually think this by itself is a reasonable take, though I’d say it also depends on the age. As a young (<25) guy, personally I would probably not date a girl with a 2-digit body count. Probably, because people are never that simple and you can’t be sure who the other person is without getting to know them. For some people this may not make a difference, and for others it may be a positive. We all have our own preferences. If you’re a low libido vanilla person, then you probably don’t want a freaky partner who likes sex a lot.
Women are looking back and realizing “homemaker” was an enviable position, usually.
This is because most jobs suck, wages are low and people want to enjoy their hobbies to stop thinking about all the global issues. Most men I know don’t see any issues with the idea of being stay-at-home husbands. It’s not women-specific.
Why did that stop? Why is nearly every household a “dual-income” house? In a large part, it is because of the feminist movement.
Almost every single word in this part is incorrect. First of all, feminism isn’t any more responsible for degrading quality of life than worker unions are. The ruling class simply decided they’ve had enough of ungrateful peasants fighting for more rights. Second, feminism has been dead for a while, so you can’t really blame it for anything substantial. 90% of modern feminists are just reverse misogynists, while the remaining 10% rarely speak out. They aren’t really considered ‘feminists’, but that’s because people generally don’t know what feminism is (or used to be?).
Now things, like rent, are WAY more expensive because they assume most house holds are dual income.
This is probably one of the last positions on the list of why rent is higher. There’s practically zero connection here. In short, rent is astronomically high, because capitalism doesn’t work. Not because women - also known as people - fought for more rights. Demanding basic rights is never a bad thing for anyone, regardless of additional unintended consequences.
It sounds like justification because it is. Putting sex on a pedestal and treating it like some extra special thing you only do for procreation with your soulmate leads to all kinds of weird hangups about it. It’s not common for someone to get lucky enough to find a partner who matches them on the first attempt.
Well… Just goes to show, we all need each other’s help to balence things.
Also, who wants loose liberal women everywhere? Honestly, I dont want to marry someone with more partners than I can count on one hand… I dont think im crazy here? Cuz liberal women usually have many past lovers, in comparison to conservative women, in general…
Over all, I find these graphs very positive. And I think things are starting to turn around. A lot of women these days realize that their grandmothers had a lot less pressure and a lot more freedom. Sure, there was more pressure to have babies, but there was much less pressure about getting a degree and a career. Women are looking back and realizing “homemaker” was an enviable position, usually.
I long for those days ive never seen. Where a guy can get an entry level position and make enough to support his family on that single income. Why did that stop? Why is nearly every household a “dual-income” house? In a large part, it is because of the feminist movement. Women wanted things to be equal in the work force, and they did. Now things, like rent, are WAY more expensive because they assume most house holds are dual income.
Edit: dual*
I actually think this by itself is a reasonable take, though I’d say it also depends on the age. As a young (<25) guy, personally I would probably not date a girl with a 2-digit body count. Probably, because people are never that simple and you can’t be sure who the other person is without getting to know them. For some people this may not make a difference, and for others it may be a positive. We all have our own preferences. If you’re a low libido vanilla person, then you probably don’t want a freaky partner who likes sex a lot.
This is because most jobs suck, wages are low and people want to enjoy their hobbies to stop thinking about all the global issues. Most men I know don’t see any issues with the idea of being stay-at-home husbands. It’s not women-specific.
Almost every single word in this part is incorrect. First of all, feminism isn’t any more responsible for degrading quality of life than worker unions are. The ruling class simply decided they’ve had enough of ungrateful peasants fighting for more rights. Second, feminism has been dead for a while, so you can’t really blame it for anything substantial. 90% of modern feminists are just reverse misogynists, while the remaining 10% rarely speak out. They aren’t really considered ‘feminists’, but that’s because people generally don’t know what feminism is (or used to be?).
This is probably one of the last positions on the list of why rent is higher. There’s practically zero connection here. In short, rent is astronomically high, because capitalism doesn’t work. Not because women - also known as people - fought for more rights. Demanding basic rights is never a bad thing for anyone, regardless of additional unintended consequences.
🙋♂️
I can’t tell if you’re sarcastic or a time traveler from 1870.
Or korean (different sociology).
Yeah, being with a woman that actually likes sex and knows what she wants is terrible…
I never insinuated anything as such. And it also 100% sounds like justification for being loose…
It sounds like justification because it is. Putting sex on a pedestal and treating it like some extra special thing you only do for procreation with your soulmate leads to all kinds of weird hangups about it. It’s not common for someone to get lucky enough to find a partner who matches them on the first attempt.
dual
Eep. Thanks.