• Sunsofold@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    20 hours ago

    The head of the second most child-predatory company that people basically only use for free games is a bad actor. Who could have guessed?

  • pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    there should be a law that says all CEOs must shut the fuck up always and forever

    • Sunsofold@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      SEC rule update: All stock shares current or future issued, are non-voting shares. Shareholders cannot be trusted to select good operators.

      Tax law change: worker cooperatives have 50% reduced tax burden. CEOs are a burden, not a resource.

      • pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        yeah for example even though I was inactive for years, it took zuck himself to help me make my decision to get the fuck off of fascbook in 2018

  • LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Lucky for them, I won’t buy any new games. Too many fantastic older games to play that they didn’t cheat and cut corners to produce.

    • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Agreed.
      What does it cost them to make a checkbox and show the value to the customer?

      If they fear it, they know that the knowledge will make me think twice on buying it.

  • SpaceScotsman@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    2 days ago

    Sugars and additives are in nearly all foods, maybe we should stop asking manufacturers to disclose it on the ingredients list.

  • Hadriscus@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 days ago

    yea that’s just playing on semantics. Of course machine learning will keep assisting many different workflows, thank you Tim.
    Go ahead with your ML-assisted procedural animations, your ML-enhanced denoising, your ML-powered stochastic mesh pruning.

    What people don’t want is generated visuals/music that try and pass off as art. I’d love to summon debility to explain that the ruling class doesn’t get it, but they do -it’s a convenient way for them to save on human labor that is also… just too tempting to use for replacing art as well.

    • tgcoldrockn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      “it’s a convenient way for them to-” insert: exploit all culture, our past and present artists, writers, musicians, etc. . . The offense is utterly incomprehensible. Its like the billion dollar relativity thingy, where you just can’t get over the relative size of the comparison to $100,000. The amount of data stolen from past and current IP is too much for the layman to ever consider. It’s the heist of the epoch.

    • 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      AI generated visuals and music are one thing, but one use of AI in that category is giving NPCs actually interesting things to say.

      Currently, without AI, they have one or two lines about the weather, or the general state of affairs, but if you can pass an LLM the current state of the world and the player’s recent actions, then run the output through a tts model tuned to a distinct voice to, you’d be making the world feel way deeper than it is now with much more insightful interactions. You could maybe go even further and add infinite mini-quests in a similar manner, but it’s better to start off small.

      AI doesn’t have to replace, and the best studios will use it to enhance and add to their art, the average ones will avoid it, and the worst ones will use it to replace art.

      • bthest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        And who’s going to be powering that NPC’s LLM model? Unless all you want is a free hotlinked chatbot window disguised as a character? Because the publishers and developers sure as hell won’t power it on their end and if they do you’ll be paying out the ass for it. Otherwise that LLM for an NPC will have to run locally on your own hardware…in addition to the game itself.

        So yeah, have fun with that.

        And dialogue generation is ALL they can do btw. They can’t navigate a character around a 3d environment or even play against you in a grand strategy game. So, looking at RAM and GPU prices… yeah the novelty of LLM in games will run it’s course pretty quick.

  • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yeah we are on the losing side of history. The future will be total ai slop. People love it. We will be the grumpy old folks yelling that the tv ruined the world.

  • Kyden Fumofly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yes, like we don’t have Handmade tags in products…

    I dont know about the future, but a “No AI-Art” tag, makes sense to me.

    • BCsven@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      I have seen handmade tags, for stuff that wasn’t machine loomed, etc. But handmade clothing is mostly dead in the consumer world, unless you class mass production methods as handmade… Which they are made by hands in some stage

      • Kyden Fumofly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Handmade clothes may be not the norm but they are not extinct. Dresses, scarfs and accesorising can be found handmade. Luxury market is in majority handmade.

        The point is that the label is not pointless. It exist and will exist in the future. I just hope that games with human art won’t be considered a luxury.

  • IonTempted@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’ve said this before that typically people don’t know what they are talking about AI, but I don’t expect this from people who SHOULD know what AI is.

    There could be technologies that AI can assist with, hell I’m not a game dev but I assume even back in the day, devs used tricks and technologies that today could be considered as AI

    However AI as in it will write you code, generate you a game and write you a story? Hell no.

    • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Yes, nuance is important

      but
      I’d argue that demanding the customer seller fill out a 20 page form on what the AI was used for (and additionally which model) would result in the opposite sentiment for the seller and customer.
      Theres a line between too little and too much information.

  • PonyOfWar@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    239
    ·
    3 days ago

    Even if that did happen, it wouldn’t defeat the point of the disclosures at all. In fact, people will appreciate it all the more if a game is made without any AI involvement and it will become a selling point.

    • Carnelian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      91
      ·
      3 days ago

      Plus, shouldn’t he want that information to be front and center anyway if he actually thinks it’s a good thing?

      • Zorque@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        43
        ·
        3 days ago

        He, like the that Microsoft suit, has just enough awareness to realize how AI is being thought of by the general public, and knows it would affect his bottom line. Which is really all he cares about.

    • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah, there’s a solid group of us that hates AI so much we’d do this.

      I try to avoid it as best I can. When it comes to art, I won’t touch anything that’s AI.

    • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      3 days ago

      At a very near point though, it’s likely going to be impossible to do it without AI involvement, or at the very least without proving you didn’t somehow.

      AI is being baked into almost every dev and art tool. They aren’t just talking about using ChatGPT, if your game uses a single texture or model that ever got touched by a machine learning algorithm, you’re using AI.

      • PonyOfWar@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        3 days ago

        As long as AI doesn’t take away our hands, it’ll always be perfectly possible to draw our own art, compose our own music and write our own code. And especially in the open-source space, there’s plenty of creative software not jumping on the AI bandwagon.

        • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          It’s becoming nearly impossible to write code in a corporate environment without AI. Everyone has AI auto complete at the minimum, and AI code generation is at a point where it’s at least even with an entry level dev.