• UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 minutes ago

      The second doesn’t have the coveted “thigh gap”, signaling that you are sufficiently anorexic. The third has the faintest shadow of muscle definition in her biceps and calves. The fourth remembered to wear socks, a thing only tall people do

    • x0x7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Not entirely. But when you live in an ethnically homogeneous society you notice more subtle differences in people.

  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    … and people get mad at me when I say this now bog standard, seemingly literally standardized anime art style is uninspired, boring, and fundamentally problematic.

    • Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      Unrelated: did you know that the term “bog standard” comes from the term “box standard” which means, essentially, vanilla. No modifications or additions, just the basic version in the box. This used to be on the boxes for things people bought.

      Now it basically means the same thing but to a none native speaker bog standard would likely not make much sense, where box standard has the context in the term.

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I genuinely did not know that.

        Makes complete sense though!

        … and yes, English is a ridiculous nonsense language, we can and routinely do things like verb(ify) nouns, we have tons of idioms and slang that well… barely even make sense to many native speakers… we have tons of homophones like threw through, their there they’re… etc…

  • justdaveisfine@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    132
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Just take those exact characters, give them different hair colors, match the personality to the hair color, boom you got a slice of life show that has a strong first season but then fades in quality and takes a weird turn in season 2+3 before a mediocre season 4 that fans try to justify but everyone really hates.

    WyVvqrKmOYMVCaC.jpg

    • glimse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I really wish there was more evolution in anime. I used to like it a lot but I’ve grown to really dislike the art style because it’s so homogenous. I’m sure I’m missing out on great stories but I’m so damn bored of cookie cutter kawaii characters

      I know that’s not every anime so no need to reply with the exceptions to the rule. The two most popular styles are “generic anime” (this) and “chibi anime” (creepy/gross)

      • SlurpingPus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        31 minutes ago

        Afaik the manga art style evolved in the first place because it’s very economic, particularly with facial expressions, and allows pumping out thick volumes of comics every week.

      • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        14 hours ago

        If you’re looking for more unique styles of anime, try out jojo’s bizarre adventure or dorohedoro. Both have quite a unique drawing style (for anime) and world building

      • msage@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Mahou shoujo Madoka magika is one fantastic story. And only 12 episodes or 2 movies (they are the same, just less OP/EDs).

            • glimse@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              12 hours ago

              Yeah but that’s what I’m saying, I dislike the generic aesthetic enough that it takes away most of the enjoyment. If I was neutral on that it’d be no big deal, but the story is only part of visual media

              • hameru@cyberplace.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                @glimse @msage Hey, I don’t wanna spoil it to you, but know that the show’s events make the visuals change and mix together with a veeeery different style. It’s honestly one of the most aesthetically unique animes I’ve watched, you’ll know what I mean if you watch at least one ep

        • DrPop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          There is a third original movie and they are making a 4th original. They’re was also a size anime loosely based on the mobile game.

          • msage@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Third movie was really weird.

            Maybe it was the crazy subtitles I had when it came out, but I didn’t like it as much as the original.

    • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      In a lot of Asia, youth is seen as attractive

      Human eyeballs are generally all the same size, regardless of skull or body size.

      Youth = small

      Big eyes and small everything else therefore means cute

      Art often exaggerates or interprets

      Anime is art

      Anime is also not a new medium at all in Japanese, and now global culture, and has had a lot of time to evolve

      I’m not defending it, just explaining it, in case people don’t understand, because this is a long-standing and very common complaint/criticism

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        But we could have like, a whole anime done in the style of Ukiyo-E, for characters design style motifs, for facial and body proportions…

        You could mock up a 3D model and cel shade these to work out how they’d work from different angles.

        This is certainly an exaggerated interpretation of reality.

        It is also certainly Japanese.

        These were also largely seen as depictions of beautiful, desirable people.

        Here, this one’s from 1932,

        The eyes are getting bigger, but noses still exist, the facial proportions are actually pretty close to realistic, if not just completely realistic, unlike in the modern standard anime style.

        I dunno, I guess the modern standard anime style is just much much more neotenous (oversized heads, relatively oversized eyes, relatively undersized/unemphaszed noses) because it is meant to appeal primarily to small children, who are themselves neotenous?

        Whereas the consumer base for Ukiyo-E would have been primarily adults?

        • SlurpingPus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 minutes ago

          Manga’s and therefore anime’s art style evolved to be drawn quickly and cheaply. A ukiyo-e anime would be expensive as hell.

        • Little8Lost@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 hours ago

          One of the earliest “modern” manga artists got influenced by the large eyes of disney and other western comics and shows
          And others adapted it

    • MotoAsh@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      “Biologically possible”, I mean, quite a few animals have eyes taking up a ton of their headspace. Owls for starters.

  • KazuyaDarklight@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I think this would be incrementally less ridiculous if they hadn’t, presumably, scaled the images causing them all to be the same size/height on the page.

        • Gladaed@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          16 hours ago

          I feel like they are actually different body types as opposed to weight differences. That being said they are still narrow. But that’s not my point.

    • Korval@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      Yep, I’m afraid Gladaed is right; definitely different pictures. When she posed for the sketches, she did something different with her arms each time. She sometimes changed her expression too. Oh, and one day she wore a shorter shirt.

  • Ephera@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I think, they miscounted. It’s actually 4 billion body types, not just 4.