• lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    bro, that’s peanuts. what a disgusting excuse of this bank. if the majority shareholders really want that, they should vote on it and be disclosed.

  • Greyghoster@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 days ago

    Responding to a question, Matt smiled, “the opportunity to make a real difference to people’s lives, not just the people who have worked in the bank, but our millions of customers.”

    The difference is obviously to milk the customers.

  • MoreZombies@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 days ago

    Okay with fleecing customers out of their money, but can’t dare hurt the precious shareholders.

    Are there such things as not-for-profit banks? Or, who is closest to respecting their customers?