• roscoe@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Idea for a new job:

    Become an expert consultant on having just the right amount of AI bullshit in your ads to generate a ton of free engagement (like this thread) without taking away from the effect in people casually watching it who hopefully won’t notice.

    Seriously, discussion over this, here and elsewhere, has forced more Coca-Cola branding into my brain than I think I’ve seen in the past year.

    • Tattorack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Working to get me buying local brands. Fuck Coca Cola. Long ass history of being an evil Corpo. This is just one more damn thing they’re doing.

  • IndridCold@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    52 minutes ago

    To be honest, I don’t know anyone who drinks that boomer juice on a regular basis.

  • Saledovil@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Remember: Drink water, or a similar non-coca-cola substance.

    Also, a consistent truck design is something a human at any skill level would have gotten right.

    • FrostyTheDoo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 hours ago

      But it doesn’t really matter for the ad if it’s the same exact truck, 99% of viewers will never notice and Coca Cola saved thousands on the production on the ad. Not saying it’s good, just stating that’s why they allowed the inconsistent truck into the ad.

  • YourMomsTrashman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    It’s not pure AI, it’s weirder than that.

    In one of the ‘behind the scenes’ videos they briefly show a comfyui workflow, essentially a ‘video to video’ workflow. Secret Level most likely makes a very basic 3d animation for the video model to iterate on, essentially slapping on an ‘AI filter’. That’s probably why it took so many people too. They are using ltx-video-2b-v0.9 for those wondering.

    Where the ‘70000 prompts’ number comes from, I have no fucking idea.

    Coca cola does so many more evil things than this, an AI ad is relatively nothing. I am mainly just looking into Secret Level here.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 hours ago

    So it is not just AI slop, it is bad AI slop. They didn’t even spend the money to find someone who is capable to write the right prompts.

  • PlzGivHugs@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    13 hours ago

    So, legally, since AI output is public domain, Pepsi (or someone else) could theoretically take this trailer and replace all the Coke logos with Pepsi, and then republish it as theirs, couldn’t they?

    • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 hours ago

      They can probably reuse the individual clips, but not this exact edit. The edit was still done by a human. AI can’t produce an entire coherent sequence of different clips. Generative AI basically can’t produce clips longer than 10 seconds without going wonky, it can’t even transition to a different camera angle in the same clip. Also the audio and music in this ad is copyrighted.

    • Gladaed@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I am not sure if a work derived from output still would be. Otherwise a lot of games will have to get surprise public domained.

      • PlzGivHugs@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 hours ago

        IANAL, but from my understanding, anything output from an AI is public domain, although specifically and only the parts that were AI generated.

        For example, there was a comic released a little while ago using AI images. The text, and layout could be copyrighted but not the images. From my understanding, this means in games, you can rip imdividual textures and resources, and reuse them, but not the full game. I think that would also make basically the entire coke commercial public domain (so long as the trademark is obscured), since the whole thing is AI generated.

        • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          The Coke ad is still edited by a human though. So you probably can’t use the same shot for shot sequence. Like if you created a movie by editing clips together from public domain movies you created a derivative work and that work is copyrightable. Even if you don’t own the copyright on the individual clips you own the copyright on the new creative expression. So people can’t just copy your exact edit. Like the idea is not copyrightable but the execution of that idea is.

    • Bubs12@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      They could but why would they want to use such a shitty ad to sell their product?

        • MrMcGasion@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          Honestly, while Pepsi isn’t a great company either, if they made an ad pointing out how much “their competitor” spent in water, electricity, etc. on making an ad using AI, and then included that “since AI-generated content can’t be copyrighted, we stole it and paid an intern 1 million dollars to replace the logo with our own” and then just play the ad with the trucks drawn over like in a school notebook to be blue pepsi trucks with the pepsi logo.

          I think if a big company went all in on being a world-class AI hater, they’d do really well. It’s kinda a huge untapped market as consumer sentiment against AI grows because it’s being pushed so hard.