• minnow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    133
    ·
    1 day ago

    “AI isn’t a bubble as long as nobody pops it” is such a great example of cognitive dissonance, I’m honestly impressed.

    • Zacsau@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      1 day ago

      And burning through freshwater for cooling and natural gas for powering. Very disciplined!

    • discocactus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      Interestingly, from a macroeconomic standpoint, “wasting” a ton of money by spending it on something that won’t ever yield profit but instead goes to pay people’s salaries, build infrastructure, and conduct intense focussed research and development of computer and energy hardware and systems could actually be a good thing for the economy. Not for the tech companies per se, but it’s a lot more productive than the circle jerking fraud of the mortgage derivatives crisis for instance. Yes, NVDA will eventually correct, but it’ll leave in its wake a huge glut of computing power, pumped up local economies across CA especially, and oversized power distribution infrastructure that could readily be used for anything else really.

      • baggachipz@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        “The AI bubble is a jobs program” is an… interesting take.

        it’s a lot more productive than the circle jerking fraud of the mortgage derivatives crisis

        No value is being created here. It’s a circular shell game and it’s going to wreck the economy for everybody.

        I’m guessing you weren’t around for the collapse of companies laying fiber infrastructure, a la MCI and Global Crossing? That was 20 years ago. Some of the fiber is finally being used now, but not a lot.

        it’ll leave in its wake a huge glut of computing power

        And what, pray tell, will we do with this glut of computing power? They’re specifically purpose-built hardware in specifically purpose-built data centers. They’re not good for anything else than these LLM models.

        Furthermore, the nVidia cards being “purchased” and put in these data centers are rapidly obsolete, so they don’t even have a chance of being used in any capacity 20 years from now. It’s like saying “let’s use 50 i486 processors in 2025” when a MacBook has more power.

        But, we’re burning more coal to power these, so… 🤷

      • RedstoneValley@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        Highly specialized computing power that nobody needs. These are not ordinary multipurpose data centers. Even if you could use the hardware to run models for, let’s say, cancer research: no one outside of the bubble is willing or able to stem the enormous costs of running the infrastructure.

        • Postimo@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          21 hours ago

          I mean they have a pretty solid point. There is in fact not a single way better way that this money could be spent in a time of looming climate catastrophe than re-opening coal plants and wasting fresh water, in the desperate hope that we can make a super being god that will solve the active climate catastrophe. It’s basic economics really.

  • Cris@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    1 day ago

    Lmao, yeah I’m sure the for profit companies with no actual monetization model will be very “thoughtful and disciplined”

  • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 day ago

    The AI but bubble has been useful for showing how utterly delusional these people are. Don’t worry, they’re merely in charge of everything.

    • pdxfed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s not delusion, they know it is not a real product, not real value, etc. but they are paid for companies whose entire future has been built on the emperor’s new clothes. Rich powerful people get news interviews, people who don’t want to keep up a profitable facade (however temporary) do not.

  • Joe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 day ago

    Why tf are they paying the equivalent value of the GDP of mid-sized country for the service then? They already made it one…