The highest number of attempts at the practical test before passing last year was 21

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    the passing grade is 43/50,

    They might just be randomly guessing and hoping that they’ll eventually get it, and thinking that their chances are better than they are.

    I think that that’d be…let’s see. Say there are four possible answers for each question. So he’s got a 75% chance of failing any individual question.

    $ maxima -q
    (%i1) load("distrib")$
    (%i2) cdf_binomial(7, 50, .75);
    (%o2)                       1.8188415357867314E-19
    

    That should give the probability of failing at most 7 answers out of 50 if there’s a 75% chance of failing any one.

    So he’s got something like a 0.000000000000000018188% chance of passing the test by randomly guessing.

    His chance of failing a single instance of that test:

    (%i3) 1-cdf_binomial(7, 50, .75);
    
    (%o3)                                 1.0
    

    Ah. He has such a ludicrously small chance of passing that Maxima can’t represent it with the current floating point precision.

    kagis a bit to figure out how to do this

    Okay, apparently Maxima has bigfloats, but they default to only 16 digits of precision; not enough for this. This should give us 200 digits of floating point precision with bigfloats.

    (%i4) fpprec:200;
    
    (%o4)                                 200
    (%i5) 1-bfloat(cdf_binomial(7, 50, .75));
    
    (%o5) 9.999999999999999998181158464213268688894671703526026636336767389444876177016785501194817697978578507900238037109375b-1
    

    Okay, so now chance of failing 128 tests in a row by randomly guessing:

    (%i6) (1-bfloat(cdf_binomial(7, 50, .75)))^128;
    
    (%o6) 9.9999999999999997671882834192983948674103659072385593201782461674117226992783470289641501110105148249790638571335177402867593272110042747272666144926576839664587182158166580514670324207313719393913737b-1
    

    So then his chance of managing to get at least one success out of 128 tests in a row by randomly guessing:

    (%i7) 1-(1-bfloat(cdf_binomial(7, 50, .75)))^128;
    
    (%o7) 2.328117165807016051325896340927614406798217538325882773007216529710358498889894851750209361428664822597132406727889957252727333855073423160335412817841833419485329675792686280606086263120236298536839b-17
    

    So he’s got about a 0.0000000000000023% chance of passing at least once in a 128 random-guess-based series of test attempts (assuming, again, that each question has four multiple choice answers). That is, he could keep doing this for the rest of his life and he’s virtually certain not to pass.

    • foggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 day ago

      You didn’t need to do all that math out to explain that mental health issues cause people to act irrationally.

      • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 day ago

        Oddballs who dive into absurdly lengthy calculations of something trivial do it out of a bizarre, joyful compulsion, rather than necessity.

        (Source: I’m one of those oddballs)