Frankly I think that your perspective is delusional and I’m not really interested in discussing it further.
before putting in reasonable effort.
You perspective here truly is naive and knee-jerk reaction based.
You say you “simply” replace them when that is not an option in a 2 party system, and would cede power to fascists presumably until millions died fighting for that to end.
You continue to fundamentally misunderstand what motivates the DNC and pathetically play right into what they would like.
In my previous comment they couldn’t just sit because of the threat of progressives and the fact that they could no longer simply run on undoing some of the harm the previous republican administration did.
It is clear you did not actually read my comment to take in meaning but instead to try to reassert your opinion which has clearly been proven not to work, over and over again for decades.
Your logic that progressives would have no pull if democrats won makes no sense because they then would be the threatening force taking over from the Conservative old gaurd.
I feel you’ve been stuck in echo chambers wishing for counterproductive idealism (revolutions you won’t start or third parties that can’t win) or status quo supporting ideas (“”“applying pressure to democrats by letting them lose”“” (crazy you think that makes sense)) so long your knee-jerk reaction to a different perspective is to not actually think it through and repeat as you’ve been told.
Luckily I read your
before putting in reasonable effort.
You perspective here truly is naive and knee-jerk reaction based.
You say you “simply” replace them when that is not an option in a 2 party system, and would cede power to fascists presumably until millions died fighting for that to end.
You continue to fundamentally misunderstand what motivates the DNC and pathetically play right into what they would like.
In my previous comment they couldn’t just sit because of the threat of progressives and the fact that they could no longer simply run on undoing some of the harm the previous republican administration did.
It is clear you did not actually read my comment to take in meaning but instead to try to reassert your opinion which has clearly been proven not to work, over and over again for decades.
Your logic that progressives would have no pull if democrats won makes no sense because they then would be the threatening force taking over from the Conservative old gaurd.
I feel you’ve been stuck in echo chambers wishing for counterproductive idealism (revolutions you won’t start or third parties that can’t win) or status quo supporting ideas (“”“applying pressure to democrats by letting them lose”“” (crazy you think that makes sense)) so long your knee-jerk reaction to a different perspective is to not actually think it through and repeat as you’ve been told.