The Supreme Court on Monday declined an opportunity to overturn its landmark precedent recognizing a constitutional right to same-sex marriage, tossing aside an appeal that had roiled LGBTQ advocates who feared the conservative court might be ready to revisit the decade-old decision.

Instead, the court denied an appeal from Kim Davis, the former Kentucky county clerk who now faces hundreds of thousands of dollars in damages and legal fees for refusing to issue marriage licenses after the court’s decision in Obergefell v. Hodges allowed same-sex couples to marry.

The court did not explain its reasoning to deny the appeal, which had received outsized attention – in part because the court’s 6-3 conservative majority three years ago overturned Roe v. Wade and the constitutional right to abortion that 1973 decision established. Since then, fears about Obergefell being the precedent to fall have grown.

    • phx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Given all the rest of the terrible shit going on, I can. In fact the big surprise is that they declined. Wonder how that might go with the Texas case

    • Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      2 days ago

      So happy for her to be in the news saying she still owe’s $360K! "She was sued by multiple couples in the county, and a jury ordered her to pay $360,000 in damages and legal fees. " smh

      • Sunflier@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        Well, it’s not 360,000. Post judgment interest has accrued during the civil case’s appeals process, so it’s a good bit more than $360,000.

          • Sunflier@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            20 hours ago

            Nice? Yes. True? More so. In the criminal cases, an appeal is a matter of right. In civil cases, you have to put funds in escrow, which neither side can touch until after the appeal so as to satisfy the judgment if you lose the appeal.

      • roscoe@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        True, it is nice to be reminded of that piece of shit’s financial ruin. We just have to hope that any donations she got went to legal fees.

    • WanderWisley@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      She is like a cicada you forget about them then after five years or so they show up and make a shit load of noise and annoy the hell out of everybody.