• agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
    35·
    2 days ago

    What? It seems like you have a lot of anger at the current system, and I get that, but I sincerely do not understand what you’re suggesting. Create a culture where authority isn’t allowed? That makes no sense. How do you enforce a ban on authority without using authority?

    Collaborate non-coercively, by any of dozens of mechanisms, and just don’t be a piece of shit. If someone is a piece of shit, abd can’t be helped to not, attempt to ostracize

    “My criminal justice policy is that people shouldn’t do crimes”. This is parody anarchism. We don’t have a lever for human species that turns off being a dick. That’s what social systems are for.

    • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
      41·
      2 days ago

      I think it’s interesting that you’ve got Agememnon as your pfp and are arguing about what is essentially a modernized cornerstone philosophy of the classical political systems

    • cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      35·
      2 days ago

      I’ve said elsewhere I’m not interested in your opinion or explaining mine to you. I think you’re just pretending to engage because you want to have an argument ive had a thousand times so you can say your dumb bullshit i’ve heard a thousand times. Fuck off. Bother someone else.

      • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
        42·
        2 days ago

        You’re the one who responded to me, what are you talking about? How do you build a society on non-coercive cooperation when you declare anyone who engages a topic is only pretending in bad faith. If it doesn’t work on the conversation level, how is it supposed to work on the societal level?