- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
cross-posted from: https://piefed.blahaj.zone/c/politicalmemes/p/392491/do-you-agree
Do you agree?
cross-posted from: https://piefed.blahaj.zone/c/politicalmemes/p/392491/do-you-agree
Do you agree?
Simple. You create a culture where that shit isn’t allowed. Make each person an informed educated sovereign of themselves.
Collaborate non-coercively, by any of dozens of mechanisms, and just don’t be a piece of shit. If someone is a piece of shit, abd can’t be helped to not, attempt to ostracize.
And don’t pretend anything bad is prevented by current hierarchy. Fuck off with that shit.
What? It seems like you have a lot of anger at the current system, and I get that, but I sincerely do not understand what you’re suggesting. Create a culture where authority isn’t allowed? That makes no sense. How do you enforce a ban on authority without using authority?
“My criminal justice policy is that people shouldn’t do crimes”. This is parody anarchism. We don’t have a lever for human species that turns off being a dick. That’s what social systems are for.
I think it’s interesting that you’ve got Agememnon as your pfp and are arguing about what is essentially a modernized cornerstone philosophy of the classical political systems
I’ve said elsewhere I’m not interested in your opinion or explaining mine to you. I think you’re just pretending to engage because you want to have an argument ive had a thousand times so you can say your dumb bullshit i’ve heard a thousand times. Fuck off. Bother someone else.
You’re the one who responded to me, what are you talking about? How do you build a society on non-coercive cooperation when you declare anyone who engages a topic is only pretending in bad faith. If it doesn’t work on the conversation level, how is it supposed to work on the societal level?