• peoplebeproblems@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    You know, sometimes it’s ok for you to be wrong. I know hexbear is a community where everything is literal, but in this case, an Iranian Monarch and Iranian Supreme Leader are just different titles for two different authoritarian Regimes.

    Just like Xi Jingping is the Authoritarian Ruler of China, like Mao was.

    • TankieTanuki [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      This is just aggressive ignorance. It’s not a matter of opinion or dependent on ideology. It’s basic history and terminology.

      an Iranian Monarch and Iranian Supreme Leader are just different titles for two different authoritarian Regimes

      Precisely. They are different words which refer to different regimes (separated by a revolution). If you use them interchangeably you will confuse people.

      Show me literally anyone else who refers to the Ayatollah as the Shah. Do an image search for “Shah of Iran” and look at the results.

      Xi and Mao are/were leaders of the same regime (The PRC), so that comparison actually makes sense. What you’re doing is the equivalent of saying the emperor of China is the same as the president of the People’s Republic of China.

        • oscardejarjayes [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Authoritarianism isn’t a very good measure of government, when a monopoly on violence is one of the defining characteristics of a state. The difference is often more perception than it is reality, and even then tyrants can be vastly different from each other. Abraham Lincoln had Northern dissenters killed, and suppressed peoples rights, yet he was still a peak president.

          Richard Nixon is the Shah. Saddam Hussein is the Shah. Modern Spain had death squads killing political opponents in my lifetime. Where isn’t lead by the Shah?

        • TankieTanuki [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Genghis Khan and Hitler were both authoritarians that had people killed over dissent.

          Therefore, Genghis Khan invaded Poland in 1939 and put European Jews in concentration camps. They are identical.

          I’m not talking about moral equivalence! You used the wrong term for the current head of state of Iran. Just learn and move forward, and stop acting like an arrogant ass when corrected.

          I’m sorry if I sounded smug when I called out your initial error.

          • peoplebeproblems@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            Yeah and they are identical too. I wasn’t referring to the head of state, I was insulting how the Iranian revolution replaced its tyrant with another tyrant.

            All tyrants are the same. Their title is bullshit.