School: “We have a no tolerance policy for bullying.”
Panel: “Not anymore, you don’t.”
Talk about missing the point. It’s not about ‘disrupting school activities’, it’s about ‘disrupting other people’s well-being’. You know, by victimizing them.
I suppose by that logic, if somebody were to stab a classmate in the subclavian artery, clamp a hand over their mouth until they bled out and discretely shove the body under a table, that’d be fine so long as there was no ‘substantial disruption to school activities’? Get real. What kind of asinine excuse for bad behavior is that? The panel might as well have declared that it’s ‘getting caught that’s the problem, not the wrongdoing’. Next they’ll be ruling that armed robbery is fine ‘so long as there’s no screaming that’ll disrupt the peace of the neighborhood’.
School: “We have a no tolerance policy for bullying.”
Panel: “Not anymore, you don’t.”
Talk about missing the point. It’s not about ‘disrupting school activities’, it’s about ‘disrupting other people’s well-being’. You know, by victimizing them.
I suppose by that logic, if somebody were to stab a classmate in the subclavian artery, clamp a hand over their mouth until they bled out and discretely shove the body under a table, that’d be fine so long as there was no ‘substantial disruption to school activities’? Get real. What kind of asinine excuse for bad behavior is that? The panel might as well have declared that it’s ‘getting caught that’s the problem, not the wrongdoing’. Next they’ll be ruling that armed robbery is fine ‘so long as there’s no screaming that’ll disrupt the peace of the neighborhood’.
The US will never conquer Greenland!