International editor says he doesn’t ‘feel particularly bad about’ his inaccuracies
BBC’s international editor Jeremy Bowen admits he ‘got it wrong’ in his coverage saying the Gaza Al-Alhi hospital was “flattened” (it was never even bombed), but still said he “doesn’t regret one thing” about his reporting and doesn’t feel particularly bad.
His inaccuracies: blaming Israel for the al-Shifa missile attack, and referring to the hospital as, “flattened.”
I’ve seen people repeating these inaccuracies constantly on Lemmy.
He didn’t blame the attach on Israel. He did say it had been flattened.
His claim of it being flattened caused the BBC to report that it was likely Israel who did it because they were the only ones who had ordinance powerful enough to level a hospital:
In the first story about the hospital on the BBC on Oct 17, correspondent Jon Donnison suggested Israel was behind the blast. Speaking shortly after 8pm on BBC News, he said: “It’s hard to see what else this could be, really, given the size of the explosion, other than an Israeli airstrike or several airstrikes.”
So you agree that he did not say that IDF were to blame?
I admit, I was surprised at how many people are indifferent to the truth (at best) regarding this conflict. I know some people in real life who see a lot of antisemitism in modern American society and I used to think they were paranoid but now I’m not sure what else could be motivating this sort of motivated reasoning.
The problem is, that Israel made it relatively easy to fall for these stories by doing similar things for real in the past.
So you’ve got a credible source (BBC) reporting something that’s not really unheard of (i.e. kind of plausible) and that’s happening to align with what you’ve already suspected. Bam, rumor is born.
BTW, you had the same mechanism shortly after the attacks with the “Hamas beheaded babies” stories.
You don’t know what could possibly cause people to have an anti-Israel bias other than antisemitism? Maybe a history book?
Criticizing Israel’s atrocities is not antisemitism it’s being a decent human being.
But being a Hamas terrorist boltlicker is pretty shitty.
I don’t support Hamas, why would you think that?
Beheaded babies and the IDF saying “we have lied before but not this time.” really muddies the water.
Do you mean the Al-Alhi Baptist missile or did one happen to Al-shifa now too?
Also this title sucks ass, not alluding to what was wrong and leaving your mind to fill it in
luckily there’s an entire article hiding behind the title!
Looks more like a paywall to me.
You can read without paywall there
Weird, I didn’t have one. Maybe it’s regional?
Edit: I’m US based so maybe there is a paywall in other countries
No paywall in Canada.
Maybe, I do have paywall in Israel.
NOODLEJETSKI CALLED A KNOW-IT-ALL
In every community, there are certain individuals who seem to possess an uncanny ability to spew out knowledge on any given topic, acting as if they know everything. They are often seen as intellectually superior, sometimes to the point of annoyance. Today, we examine the case of noodlejetski, a person who has been described by some as a know-it-all.
read more...
First and foremost, it is important to distinguish between arrogance and a genuine thirst for knowledge. noodlejetski is renowned for his insatiable curiosity about the world around him. In discussions, he displays a genuine interest, asking thoughtful questions and actively listening to others. Rather than simply flaunting his intelligence, noodlejetski seeks to engage in meaningful conversations, inviting others to contribute their own knowledge and opinions. This behavior shatters the stereotype of the typical know-it-all who only seeks to dominate discussions.
Furthermore, noodlejetski’s wide range of interests, studies, and experiences has contributed to his vast knowledge across numerous disciplines. From literature and history to science and technology, there is hardly a topic that noodlejetski cannot discuss with a certain degree of expertise. This breadth of knowledge stems from years of dedicated learning, reading, and exploring various fields. Rather than claiming to know everything, noodlejetski acknowledges that there is always more to learn.
To those who view noodlejetski as a know-it-all, it is essential to consider his motivations. noodlejetski genuinely enjoys sharing the knowledge he has accumulated over the years. This enthusiasm can occasionally be misread as arrogance, leading to misconceptions about his character. In reality, noodlejetski’s passion for learning encourages him to engage in conversations and debates, aiming to foster a collective environment for growth and exchange of ideas.
Ultimately, after a thorough examination of noodlejetski’s character and behavior, it becomes clear that he cannot simply be categorized as a know-it-all. His genuine curiosity, humility, and eagerness to learn make him a person who enriches discussions rather than stifling them. noodlejetski’s infectious enthusiasm for knowledge, coupled with his willingness to listen and engage with others, results in an inclusive and enlightening atmosphere in which everyone can contribute.
In conclusion, it is evident that noodlejetski defies the stereotypes often associated with know-it-alls. He is indeed an incredibly knowledgeable and intellectually curious individual, but he is far from being arrogant or dismissive of others’ perspectives.
;)
FWIW, your post is far more insufferable than the one you are calling out.
True
k
Wow, you used far too many words to say that you don’t like to read.
Agree, I wanted to edit it for it to say what have he said but rules state to not change the title.
You could put it in the body.
Actually that’s a great idea, thanks, I’ll do it right now!
Dude shares the name of an ex. The headline threw me for a loop.
Welcome to Whose Truth is it Anyway?, where the news is made up and the facts don’t matter.
“Should I accept responsibility? No, I’ll just double down.”
“Just a mild oopsie and all. No harm (for me).”
Oh well as long as you don’t feel bad about it man
To be clear Bowen did not from my recollection say that the strike was from Israeli. He did, however, incorrectly say that the hispital had been “flattened” based in drone footage he was looking at on screen.
I mean technically yes but it’s one of those things where you’re saying Israel did it without saying it directly. Its really not much better.
No. The programme as a whole said responsibility hadn’t been determined. The news was breaking as Bowen was on air - he didn’t say anything about responsibility
I think I just have to agree to disagree. It’s a simple philosophy problem in my head
“Hospital got flattened”
“Hamas doesn’t have munitions to flatten hospital”
“Israel flattened the hospital”
If you’re reporting about a flattened hospital in Gaza, you’re tactically supporting the idea Israel did it by simply reporting that a hospital got flattened. It also shouldn’t suprise you that’s how many people online ran with it.
The report of a massive explosion outside the hospital would have lead the same people who made assumptions about Israel being responsible to assume that Israel was responsible.
Maybe lemmy.ml will unban me now that they can see I was right all along.
I wonder how all those cringy hamas whiners feel now? If they even think about how wrong they were.
I don’t think that most of them care. It’s like the Musk and Starlink incident. People rather stick with the original story even when it turns out to be false.
Removed by mod
I guess that answers the question; they feel like mouth-frothing
deleted by creator
“Oh look we were right one time and you guys were wrong one time! That means Israels ethnic cleansing is justified!”
International editor doesn’t understand how media works.
