• CARCOSA [they/them]@hexbear.netEnglish
    7·
    1 年前

    Friendly reminder that the lemmy.world admins doxxed one of their users they thought was me. They also log and monitor the IPs and the emails used to sign up on their instance as well as use a discord bot to log all posts/comments made to lemmy.world. Don’t make accounts on their instance!

  • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml
    41·
    1 年前

    Nazis are basically never banned from any lemmy instances, except our, for being nazis. I rarily even see nazi shit banned despite reporting it every time, and if they are banned, it’s usually for tone policing reason.

      • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml
        31·
        1 年前

        Look at modlog. Basically no one banned for being nazi, and you just need to skim worldnews to see some nazi apologia. They are sometimes banned but as i said for other reasons. Also i meant all instances, can Dessalines and Nutomic even ban people at let’s say .world?

        • ImOnADiet🇵🇸 (He/Him)@lemmygrad.ml
          2·
          1 年前

          modlog is a bit busted, it can be hard to tell if you don’t specifically sort by actions. No they can’t ban .world users, I just haven’t really seen any of the apologia coming from .ml like I have .world

          • KiG V2@lemmygrad.ml
            2·
            1 年前

            Now that ive poked around lemmygrad i can indeed see there are a lot of liberals around here recently. Annoying but if 1 in every 10 gets affected by their stay here over time, thats a huge win.

          • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
            0·
            1 年前

            I haven’t seen that phrase. How much does it appear? Is it used by nazi-types? I think I’m missing some critical info.

            I’m very anti-nazi, but I haven’t seen anything approaching nazi speech in the couple of months that I’ve been here. I’ve seen right-wing apologists and occasional conspiracy support, but that gets called out and voted down. Am I experiencing a diff Lemmy because I’m not subscribed to specific channels or something?

            • diegeticscream[all]🔻@lemmygrad.ml
              3·
              1 年前

              I mostly just meant that as a reply to KIGV2, as they’d have context for it.

              It’s a very common saying in this instance, and in other communist spaces online.

              The underlying idea is basically that fascism and liberalism are inherently interlinked. Liberalism creates the conditions for fascism to thrive (uncritical free speech, private property), and fascism protects the basic things Liberalism does (private property etc).

              “Scratch a liberal and a fascist bleeds”, “fascism is the military wing of liberalism”, and “social democracy is objectively the moderate wing of fascism” are all quotes meant to communicate that relationship.

              You might find this bit ofthis piece interesting/relevant:

              Firstly, it is not true that fascism is only the fighting organisation of the bourgeoisie. Fascism is not only a military-technical category. Fascism is the bourgeoisie’s fighting organisation that relies on the active support of Social-Democracy. Social-Democracy is objectively the moderate wing of fascism. There is no ground for assuming that the fighting organisation of the bourgeoisie can achieve decisive successes in battles, or in governing the country, without the active support of Social-Democracy. There is just as little ground for thinking that Social-Democracy can achieve decisive successes in battles, or in governing the country, without the active support of the fighting organisation of the bourgeoisie. These organisations do not negate, but supplement each other. They are not antipodes, they are twins. Fascism is an informal political bloc of these two chief organisations; a bloc, which arose in the circumstances of the post-war crisis of imperialism, and which is intended for combating the proletarian revolution. The bourgeoisie cannot retain power without such a bloc. It would therefore be a mistake to think that “pacifism” signifies the liquidation of fascism. In the present situation, “pacifism” is the strengthening of fascism with its moderate, Social-Democratic wing pushed into the forefront.

              If that’s not your speed, that’s cool. Lemmygrad’s not for everyone, and you should be able to block the communities that are most active here!

  • motherfucker [they/them, she/her]@hexbear.netEnglish
    2·
    1 年前

    parenti-hands

    And those who demand instant perfection the day after the revolution, they go up and say “Are there civil liberties for the fascists? Are they gonna be allowed their newspapers and their radio programs, are they gonna be able to keep all their farms? The passion that some of our liberals feel, the day after the revolution, the passion and concern they feel for the fascists, the civil rights and civil liberties of those fascists who are dumping and destroying and murdering people before.

    Libs gonna lib

        • Addfwyn@lemmygrad.ml
          02·
          1 年前

          I think they moved out of the “let’s have a discussion about banning nazis” phase to the “Really, were the Nazis as bad as everyone thinks they were?” phase.

      • aaaaaaadjsf [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netEnglish
        1·
        1 年前

        And one of the reasons was hexbear being anti NATO. In what world is being against NATO a bad thing? I’d guess the majority of the world’s populace is not fond of NATO.

        Extremely ironic that the Lemmy dot world instance is hostile to the geopolitical opinions of most of the world. Typical “international community” us-foreign-policy type shit.