Lemmy
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Sunshine (she/her)@piefed.caM to Electric Vehicles@slrpnk.netEnglish · 11 days ago

China’s auto regulators eye ban on retractable door handles, report says

carnewschina.com

external-link
message-square
35
fedilink
150
external-link

China’s auto regulators eye ban on retractable door handles, report says

carnewschina.com

Sunshine (she/her)@piefed.caM to Electric Vehicles@slrpnk.netEnglish · 11 days ago
message-square
35
fedilink
China's auto regulators eye ban on retractable door handles, report says
carnewschina.com
external-link
China considers sweeping ban on fully retractable car door handles amid safety concerns.
  • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    According to this the average EV uses just under 18.9kWh for 100km. 0.6kWh is over 3%.

    I find it really really hard to believe that regular door handles cost 3% of your energy. I suspect that’s a massive over estimate.

    • BussyCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 days ago

      I got the number from here

      “Engineers say that drag reduction due to flush handles amounts to just 0.005-0.01 Cd, saving about 0.6 kWh per 100 km.“

      https://www.carscoops.com/2025/09/chinas-possible-ban-on-retractable-door-handles-could-have-ripple-effect/

      • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 days ago

        Huh.
        I guess it’s costing me about 5p per 100km and it’s not going to bankrupt me, but it’s definitely a lot more than I expected. Thanks for the link. There are some interesting articles in there.

        • BussyCat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 days ago

          Still think the ones with 8lb motors in them are a complete waste and can fail too easily but them being flush doesn’t seem like as much of the problem as it being motorized which is the part I personally believe they should correct

          • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 days ago

            Absolutely

Electric Vehicles@slrpnk.net

electricvehicles@slrpnk.net

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

Overview:

Electric Vehicles are a key part of our tomorrow and how we get there. If we can get all the fossil fuel vehicles off our roads, out of our seas and out of our skies, we’ll have a much better environment. This community is where we discuss the various different vehicles and news stories regarding electric transportation.


Related communities:

  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 142 users / day
  • 772 users / week
  • 2.03K users / month
  • 5.55K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 1.66K subscribers
  • 2.04K Posts
  • 7.05K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • sabreW4K3@slrpnk.net
  • sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al
  • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works
  • Sunshine (she/her)@piefed.ca
  • BE: 0.19.9
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org