- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
Alt-text:
A crude drawing of a girl wearing a ski mask and holding a cartoonish bomb.
Labeled: illegalist gf
Text blocks surround her which read:
“laws aren’t real, silly.”
“a relationship is too formal of an organization; how about an affinity couple.”
only watches pirated movies.
“let’s have a slumber party; we can paint our nails and make bombs.”
she embrace you like she embrace criminality.
“can I borrow your pressure cooker?”
loves you almost as much as she hates cops
"I- I stole you that book you wanted, anon…
she cute, but also… she loot.
“galleani did nothing wrong”
You must log in or register to comment.
“laws aren’t real silly”
Dream convo
The version with two (or more) of these is so much fun.
Easily the best gf, would seek one if not married
Silly, she doesn’t care that you’re married.
She does not! Thats part of why she’s special lol
She can however recognize the validity of my entirely equitable union, wherein gender roles are often subverted if not actively ignored. I am, she would appreciate, the husband who does the fuckin dishes.
We’ll see each other on the same fediverse posts about to link the comments to “Desert” by Anon and leave it there, knowing good work is being done by someone who in another life, maybe…
If anyone needs me ill be quietly reading Novatore tonight totally not projecting off people I’ve known nope
Agree except with her take on relationships. Someone has obviously never heard of relationship anarchy.
I dont make bombs (im not that precise) and i have my own pressure cooker (i got it to sterilize jars of dirt)
you use your preessure cooker as an autoclave for dirt? normally I would ignore you, but this is so unusual I have to ask what for ?
As somebody who has autoclaved dirt - they’re probably growing mushrooms
mushrooms need sterile dirt? I had no idea.
It’s a pretty easy process, there’s a flow chart below and one of the first questions is “do you own a pressure cooker”
https://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/24420178#24420178
If you do not own a pressure cooker there are other ways, but you will be fighting mold at some point. The broke boi Tek is tried and true
https://m.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLZkN1XUUEvapiQocq9Fs8XYsLmGrajZeX
Tek
Instant confirmation that person knows what’s up.
Same!
If you want the right type of mushroom to grow, yes. If you want any kind of fungus, no
Otherwise the mold wins.
Who can say?
can i borrow your pressure cooker
you better be making some chilli with my instapot, cause you break it and you owe me another one
She’s making something with heat, that’s for sure.
I might’ve met the perfect woman if she’s into making caltrops out of nails for the first date
Now how can an illegalist borrow a pressure cooker. Illegalist, is you gonna give it back?
Does she live in Canada? 🤭
Wen u become ð comrade.
Propaganda of the deed is a failed strategy that set anarchism back decades in the US.
Luigi.
… galleani?
Isn’t as popular as you think, is not an anarchist, and the political implications of his (alleged) actions are not clear to me.
His (professed) politics are a shit show, but he did allegedly do propaganda of the deed.
And it worked, at least a little. I can’t find anyone on rhe trains and busses of los angeles whos hostile to him.
I think the events around him are interesting but I think if propaganda of the deed is to be effective the target needs to be basically universally reviled. While younger and left leaning people have largely supported Luigi, most older people don’t, and that’s part of why I think, despite being one of the more successful examples, it still didn’t achieve much of anything.
Also, I actually think that Luigi having incoherent political views was good in this case since there was no concrete movement the ruling class could blame and justify repression against. If he had been an anarchist instead I think things could have gone a lot worse. Especially if Trump or someone more autocratic had been in power.
most older people don’t
Again, i have not found a single person while having conversations on tje public trsnsit and streets of los angeles whos hostile.At most they’re in the ‘well he did a bad thing, but i get it’ camp.
universally reviled
yeah that helps. Also the plan popping off helps. Americans have no sympathy for failure.
not associated with a movement
Im not so sure that couldn’t work. Know more than one who turned left because of that act. The considerations are complex, but, like, there’s probably a way. I’ll leave it to the pro violence doers.
The people you personally interact with in your specific social context in one city in the US are not representative of the country as a whole.
https://www.wmur.com/article/poll-young-americans-united-healthcare-ceo/63225999
The killing was not popular and if anarchists were associated with it, it would only make them even more unpopular than they already are.
‘Acceptable’ and ‘unacceptable’ also much narrower criteria. A lot of the people i talk to saying ‘i dobt like murder but i understand it/dont hold it against him’ might say ‘unacceptable.’
And not everyone everywhere is going to be sympathetic. Thats fine. If the people of bootlick arkansas want to die in chains, that is their perogative.
I’m not generally for or against, just pointing out that it works sometimes and does spark dialogue. Even if its more complicated than ‘do crime be popular’.
Oh, also, should be noted: people lie about their values and preferences. Especially around violence.
Not like maliciously, just bevause that’s what you say. Especially in a public context-like a poll.
And plenty don’t actually know what they believe/believe in nothing re: abstract principles.
Nobody likes war for war’s sake, but plenty of people have never seen a war they didnt like.
So im not sure a lot of people really can answer the question polled with any honesty.
Nerd
True.
Lol. Being genuine though, I don’t think of illegalism as a strategy, but more so a lifestyle that’s most congruent with my values, so I’d argue that it can’t really ‘fail’ in that sense.
I do think there’s some worthwhile theory behind it, and legitimate benefits outside of individual empowerment, but those aren’t what drive me
Edit: it just occurred to me you’re probably responding specifically to the Galleani part. Idk much about him tbh
Yeah I’m not objecting to the meme as a whole, laws aren’t my jam at all but blowing people up really didn’t get the movement anywhere.
