• jerakor@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Year of the Linux desktop pushed out a year due to Linux infighting and intolerable advocates for the 33rd year. Clearly the fault of the other distros as I use Arch.

  • mavu@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I think he should just drop linux support.
    no need to whine or complain.
    “not doing linux builds anymore, here is the source, build it yourself if you want”, done.

  • Integrate777@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Arch linux. Hmm. Could it be because of the users? Lately arch linux has become the most popular distro for people trying linux for the first time. Are they all congregating on duckstation’s github to cry about it?

  • yarr@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is sad. Various programs have gone through the same type of situation with Debian stable. Debian is very conservative and doesn’t ship upgrades quickly on their stable branch. Various authors have complained because they frequently get emails / bug reports from Debian users, who happen to be using a few-years-old version of their software.

    I do understand the frustration, but it does feel a bit like throwing the baby out with the bathwater.

    It’s possible there are other solutions, like detecting whatever random issue is frustrating people and pop up a dialog.

    For example, if he’s upset with it being broken on Wayland, why not detect Wayland and start off with a dialog: “Wayland is beta and is not officially supported. See FAQ here: […]”

    Just blocking people feels over the top. But hey, it’s his project, if he wants to go this way, it’s his choice and right. Depending on the license he might get forked, but that’s just how it goes.

  • magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    As someone who used to use arch for years, I can’t stand its users who go around acting like running it is some herculean task that takes serious knowledge.

    In reality its not much more than a misbehaved pet that requires constant attention and a blog post to be read every month or so. Not because its hard, but because its updates are just kinda slapped together and tossed out in the name of speed.

    One of the biggest indicators of this is the AUR. For what it was worth, the Gentoo crowd it replaced at least knew how to compile a program.

    Maybe learn to use git, tar, and make like literally anyone else on any other fucking distro.

  • arc99@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    The answer for this guy and other people stretched by supporting Linux is to say it’s flatpak or nothing. Stop trying to build for each dist because it’s not sustainable. If someone on a dist wants to maintain a package then let them take the heat if it is broken.

  • patatahooligan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    105
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    I see a few top level comments agreeing with the sentiment that users are being entitled or abusive, but what are they actually referring to? The linked image certainly has no evidence of such behavior. Someone who claims to be the developer filed a deletion request for the duckstation-git AUR package on the AUR and they say:

    Every time, it turns into abuse towards me, as you can also see in the comments for the package.

    I read through a few pages of the comments here and they’re mostly people talking about fixing issues with the package, and what to do about the dev purposely breaking the build… I only found a single message that could be called abuse:

    @eugene, not really but i suspect it’s an uphill battle, check the commit message: https://github.com/stenzek/duckstation/commit/30df16cc767297c544e1311a3de4d10da30fe00c

    FWIW, I’m moving to pcsx-redux, I rather run a little bit less advanced PSX emulator than software by this upstream asshat. Regardless, much thanks for maintaining the AUR package so far.

    And even this is not a good example of what stenzek is describing. For one, it’s obviously a reaction to stenzek’s hostile changes and not the sort of user coming for support and being abusive that stenzek is talking about. The user is also explicitly moving to a different emulator and not expecting any change from duckstation.

  • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Refuse to build in Arch package environments. My license does not allow for packages

    but it’s not a package. On arch it downloads the source from his own git and it compiles it on the end user machine. He is a dev and doesn’t know that? Or just pretending?

    AUR is just (automated) instructions on how to compile (except -bin, in that case it’s packaged)

    A previous commit of the readme even said:

    Linux users are encouraged to build from source when possible

    yes, good luck building from source without documentation on what libraries do you need

  • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    2 days ago

    Dev here who also happens to support Linux, and while Linux has its own challenges (whoever came up with the libevdev API, should not allowed to come up with any other API’s), I think it’s good to support Linux natively regardless. GNOME devs however should stop forcing their UX ideas onto others sometimes even outside of Linux. One of them when I was asking about how to I make the Alt key on Windows to stop it trying to open the nonexistent menu bar, then they told me to “just add one”. I’m developing games, not just desktop apps, where the alt key isn’t expected to open a menu bar. I then got told that it’s “expected behavior” (Hungarian here, I’d like to expect that both alt keys are for accessing a second set of gliphs, and one of them isn’t a dedicated “menu key”), and that games like Unreal Tournament “did it already” (that one used the escape key for menus).

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    206
    arrow-down
    51
    ·
    3 days ago

    itt: a bunch of entitled Linux youths that don’t understand burnout or QOL.

    dude has set a limit to what he wants or is willing to do. still gets called a bitch for defining the line and is still called an asshole.

    some of y’all even bring up multiple cases of other foss devs doing/saying the same thing, continue to call them assholes.

    🤔 There’s a pattern here…but I’m just too blinded by the brilliancy of my distro to see it…

    • DaTingGoBrrr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      The problem has originated because he changed the license resulting in older versions being the only way to ship duckstation.

      Edit: lisence to license

      • wigit@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        2 days ago

        I wonder if he received permission from all the other contributors to change the license of their contributions.

    • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      86
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      Notice how the developer argues he forbids packages and how the AIR is in violation of this? But an AUR PKGBUILD is not a package - it’s build instructions. It doesn’t distribute or package anything, you can check it yourself. It’s not called “PKG” for a reason. He misunderstands his own license and believes the allegedly broken PKGBUILD violates it.

      He may be right about some users annoying him with bug reports though I’d be surprised if it was that common. It seems like he got a couple of reports, noticed the “forbidden” PKGBUILD and then reacted like this. Just like when changing the license from GPL to CC-BY-NC-ND in order to combat… GPL violations and trademark infringements?

      Frankly, the project has not had parricularly stable leadership in a while. Though a bit unfair of a comparison, compare it to Dolphin and you can see a night and day difference in project management.

      • RedFrank24@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Ironic that a guy who facilitates large amounts of piracy is complaining about violating license agreements.

      • wigit@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        If someone wanted to maintain the PKGBUILD for this project, it’d be trivial to include a patch that removes the code he added trying to make it not build.

        Or, to make sure to not be in breach of the no-derivatives part of his lisence, just reimplement it and ship with a patch that fixes his “blocker”.

    • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      71
      arrow-down
      28
      ·
      3 days ago

      Seriously, this thread is honestly vile and these people are a perfect example as to why this is happening.

      How they are this blind to their own toxicity is beyond me

      • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        65
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        I haven’t read anything VILE here. It’s happening because he’s both controlling and implicitly bad at maintaining said control. Had he not insisted on trying to control packages he would have had a working package like every other software project in the ecosystem that is properly maintained for free by other people’s labor.

      • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        29
        ·
        2 days ago

        it’s honestly why I don’t open source any of my projects.

        like, I want to make the world a better place but at the same time it cannot cost me my QOL because some entitled punk thinks they can demand shit from me.

      • BurgerBaron@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        Defending a dick head dev they know nothing about or their history and insulting end users under false assumption. Overly self righteous.

        Yep, reddit as fuck.

    • febra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      People just expect open source devs that do this shit in their free time with absolutely no compensation to bend over for them and do everything they please. The good thing about open source development is that you can just help with the development yourself.

      • dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yes, but no one can help this one developer because they changed the license. So now the project is just source available, not open source. They chose to be alone.

      • seralth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Normally you’d be right, but in this case the guy just actually does have a history of being an a****** to everybody. This is very much a case of a developer being the problem.

        He has a history of starting s*** being an a****** and then complaining when everyone else is an a****** to him.

        That’s not even getting into. Basically every problem he is complaining about is of his own making or his own ignorance.

        The whole aur problem is because of his own, very likely illegal license change

      • stormeuh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’d go further, you should help with the development. Seems like some people would rather spend hours hounding a developer to implement their thing, rather than figuring out how to do it themselves…

        • seralth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 days ago

          He changed the license so no one can legally help him. He kind of put himself in this position. And very likely did so illegally

          • stormeuh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            OK I didn’t know that, stupid move on his part then… What do you mean by likely illegally?

            • Dultas@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              Not a license expert but he changed the license to a more restricted one but did not ask contributors which the previous license may have required.

        • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          Except the Duckstation developer changed the license to where they don’t accept contributions from others, so we couldn’t help even if we wanted to.

    • GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      33
      ·
      2 days ago

      G*mers are entitled pieces of shit.

      Linux users are arrogant hipster assholes.

      It’s a perfect storm for creating just the worst people ever. And that’s before we add the weird belittlement open source devs get.

    • socsa@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      41
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I just cannot wrap my head around an emulator dev who isn’t daily driving Linux…

      Damn people are really misunderstanding this comment. Legitimately just don’t know anyone who is involved in FOSS projects who doesn’t primarily use Linux. Not really passing judgement here, just making an observation.

      • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        46
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I’m all for jerking around on Windows folks to use Linux in jest and fun, but to purposely shit on a major contributor of any foss for not using Linux makes my blood boil.

        honestly, I hope the dev reads this and takes my advice.

        as a Linux guy, run dude. fuck these assholes. they don’t deserve your time, your talent, or your efforts. gank your shit, rewrite the license, and block any Linux use. and make sure you call out the distro(s) responsible. sometimes assholes have to be put in their place to learn anything. even then, if history tells us anything they’re just going to go poison some other poor dev and forget about you.

            • cole@lemdro.id
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              27
              ·
              2 days ago

              right but unless you sign a contributor licensing agreement when you contribute then the copyright owner can’t relicense code you contributed.

              so if you contribute to a GPL codebase it’s pretty legally perilous to try to unilaterally relicense code that isn’t “yours”.

              this is pretty nebulous territory anyways, but I’d argue it’s pretty unethical to relicense to a more restrictive license essentially “taking” the GPL code from contributors

              • deaddigger@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                Well yes and no you can release them going forward under a new licence. If you obtained your copy under the old license you can use it under the old license when you obtain a new copy you have a new license agreement. Thats absolutly possible to do. Revoking licenses is alot harder though and changing the lizens from a foss on to another is often confusing and business inapropiate. However it is legal.

                • mobotsar@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  17 hours ago

                  Assuming newer versions are derived from code that was licensed GPL in the old version, the newer versions (which include new code) are also licensed GPL, whether the person writing the new code likes it or not.

            • 9bananas@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              yes you can!

              …for new versions. not for already released ones.

              at least not with most common copyleft/open source licenses.

              edit: assuming a solo project. see below.

              • VonReposti@feddit.dk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                2 days ago

                Only if you are the sole contributor or get a written consent from all contributors. GPL doesn’t hand over the copyright to the maintainer.

                • BurgerBaron@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Dolphin is the poster child example of changing licences properly. It was a painful job just getting in touch with all the long inactive devs.

              • deaddigger@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                Well yes and no you can release them going forward under a new licence. If you obtained your copy under the old license you can use it under the old license when you obtain a new copy you have a new license agreement. Thats absolutly possible to do.

                Revoking licenses is alot harder though and changing the lizens from a foss on to another is often confusing and business inapropiate. However it is legal.

                Edit: A license is for not vopyright owners not the copyright holder. The copyright holder can basically do whatever they want.

                • 9bananas@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  yes and no:

                  the copyright owner can do whatever they want, but they can’t really revoke a GPL license. that’s not really a thing.

                  and the part about

                  If you obtained your copy under the old license you can use it under the old license when you obtain a new copy you have a new license agreement.

                  seems to me like you are implying that “use under the old license” means “run the program on my own machine”, but that’s not true, since GPL explicitly allows redistribution and modification.

                  under a GPL license, you effectively give up control over your software voluntarily:

                  The GNU General Public Licenses are a series of widely used free software licenses, or copyleft licenses, that guarantee end users the freedom to run, study, share, or modify the software.

                  (highlighted the relevant portion for your convenience)

                  this makes revoking the license effectively impossible.

                  you could continue development under a different license, but that gets legally tricky very quickly.

                  for example: all the code previously under GPL, stays under GPL. so if someone where to modify those parts of the code and redistribute it as a patch, you couldn’t legally do anything about that.

                  which seems to be what the OOP claims the change to a CC-BY-NC-ND forbids, apparently misunderstanding, that this new license only applies to code added to the repo since the license change, not the code from before the license change.

          • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            2 days ago

            fair enough, but that doesn’t mean he has to do everything anyone asks him. he’s still within his rights to close the source down and obliterate it from the internet. others will come and pick up the torch.

        • socsa@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          Not really sure how you read my comment as “shitting” on anyone. I’m just commenting that it’s unexpected and unusual for a FOSS dev to not be Linux user. Idc what they do, just making the observation as someone involved in the FOSS space that most of my peers are more likely to shit on windows than Linux.

          • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            25
            ·
            2 days ago

            you didn’t make an observation. you made a statement. you stated that it’s impossible to fathom why anyone doing foss would continue using Windows over Linux.

            it’s not impossible, you just choose to disregard their personal preferences.

            • tabular@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              “It’s impossible” is often used not to literally describe a logically impossible event but instead as an exaggeration. “I can’t possibly fathom why” is also not literal, it means under regular circumstances.

              I cannot imagine why anyone would prefer grass that cuts your skin over regular grass means for typical people using grass in typical garden/field situations. That could be someone’s person preference but that it’s not typical, it’s unexpected.

        • zonnewin@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Just open source it and leave it to the Linux community.

          I understand not wanting to support something you don’t use yourself.

          • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            2 days ago

            He chooses to do direct support over discord vs making people make github issues and wants to whine that this is taxing

  • whaleross@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    268
    arrow-down
    49
    ·
    3 days ago

    Gamers can be the most entitled demanding assholes. Arch users can be the most annoying arrogant and conceited people to exist online.

    I wouldn’t dare imagine dealing with the unholy mix of arch gamers min-maxing social skills for inferiority complex.

    I’d rather drop support too.

      • woelkchen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        398
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        3 days ago

        Is there a specific interaction that made them angry?

        Stenzek’s feeling got hurt when DuckStation was still proper open source software and people used the software fully in accordance with its license, i.e. they distributed modifications and not all permitted modifications were the most polished ones, so he felt that they give his name a bad reputation. Again: Stenzek released DuckStation under a license that explicitly allows this.

        So he rage quit open source and released new DuckStation versions under a very restrictive “source available to look but not touch” license that’s so insanely restrictive, Linux distributions are not allowed to make their own packages. So they ship the old version that works just fine because PlayStation 1 emulation was figured out very long ago. Stenzek feels that they should not ship the old version (which they are fully entitled to) and instead make a special exception for his software alone to point their users to DuckStation’s website where instead of acquiring the emulator from their package manager (or “app store” in case you’re not familiar with that term), Linux users should take extra steps to manually download and install DuckStation.

        And since users may not know about this rift, they may post bug reports and feature ideas to Stenzek, even though these bugs may have been long fixed by non-open source DuckStation.

        Basically: Stenzek did not read the license he picked for his software and then got mad when people made use of provisions explicitly allowed by the license.

          • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            73
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            This is a great case for a “reader added context” feature for Lemmy, if it could be implemented in a decent way.

            • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              21
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              It is implemented. It’s known as “comments”. You are looking at it. There’s no need for any particular UI feature for this stuff.

              • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                11
                ·
                2 days ago

                Reader added context is nice because it averts drive by upvoting of titles that are misleading (and vice versa), as most voters do not dig through the comments.

                Hence this very phenomenon of highly upvoted posts that probably wouldn’t be so with the missing context.

                • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  Tbf a substantial amount of voters did see the comment - at the time of writing, 297 upvotes on the comment vs 483 upvotes on the post, or ~61%. So actually most people do dig through the comments, if the upvote count is something to go by at least.

                  Anyone who doesn’t read comments is unlikely to read reader added context, so you’re probably not getting a large amount of the remaining 39% of people to get the context just because you add some extra UI feature.

                  Besides, explaining the context is a much longer affair than a title and just wouldn’t fit. It’s not like I would even say that the title of this post is misleading in the first place, it’s actually pretty to-the-point.

                  There’s also a chance that people will get the wrong idea about posts without the context - i.e. that posts without reader added context are super truthful somehow. I feel that people should rather accept that all titles of a few sentences are missing context. That is after all the point of a title - to summarize and bring only the most important information, which inevitably leads to a loss of context.

            • msprout@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Could be a good feature to add to PieFed, which is built on Python specifically to allow more developers to have access to building extensions and plugins.

              • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                Programming language isn’t a problem as much as the mechanics of the implementation.

                I mean, how does it work on Twitter? Do they have oldschool language models parse upvoted comments and automatically generate it? Basically the options are:

                • Involve some kind of ML model for partial automation, which is not going to go over well with Lemmy users.

                • Leave the UAC completely to mods, which is going to both overburden them and make power-tripping issues far worse

                • msprout@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  On old Twitter, community notes was simply a function of raising a flag for tweets that got ratio’d. This would open those tweets up for Community Notes users to submit a fact check. Then, the fact check with the highest upvotes gets displayed as the default one.

                  Now? Not sure. Elon is a sneaky fucker. But I do think it could be implemented as a simple comment queue that admins and moderators could set user roles to help with.

        • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          48
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          This happens way too much.

          “What? People are doing things with my Apache project I don’t like!?”

        • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          61
          ·
          2 days ago

          One of the most entitled takes I’ve ever read.

          The guy built software and opened sourced it. People started packaging it for their favourite distribution repositories and then users started coming to him for support on problems he didn’t create!

          It’s like if you were a farmer selling eggs and some kids bought your eggs and started throwing them at people’s houses and then instead of the cops arresting the kids they come arrest you for selling eggs. It’s bullshit!

          • missingno@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            57
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            2 days ago

            How does that analogy make any sense? No one has done anything malicious to him. He released open source software, got mad and revoked the open source license for newer versions, then got even more mad when people continued using the old open source version. Which is a problem he brought on himself. And his continued tantrums still won’t keep distros from packaging the only version they even can package.

            • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              27
              arrow-down
              18
              ·
              2 days ago

              He got mad because people kept bugging him to fix problems created by other people which he has no control over. His “tantrums” are his way of re-asserting control over his life.

              Open source dev burnout from support requests is a real and widespread phenomenon. When a software developer releases the fruits of their hard work they are doing the wider community a service. When large numbers of people begin to contact the developer for support the effect can be overwhelming even though every individual request may be legitimate and non-malicious.

              In the case of packaging errors created by a third party not in contact with (let alone under the control of) the developer, these support requests for dealing with unsolvable and irrelevant (in the developer’s eyes) problems can be absolutely maddening.

              I am quite sure the developer would have had no issues with people doing what they did as long as they accepted the responsibility to fix their own issues without contacting him. The fact that they did not do so (and therefore caused him grief) is negligent even if it isn’t malicious.

              • seralth@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                No he gets mad at users and insults them even when it is his own code. He’s a royal asswad. This isn’t even the first time he’s created a problem due to his own short sightedness then bitches about the results.

                This ENTIRE problem is of his own making.

                Sure users are annoying, but when you fuck up you don’t just insult the confused users due to your own fuck up. While doubling down and making it worse for yourself.

                This guy is self defeating.

              • amorpheus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                15
                ·
                2 days ago

                Is the issue with the packaging, or that only an outdated version can be packaged?

                He could fix the license, then people would push the up to date version and users wouldn’t report old bugs.

                • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  9
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  He changed the license in the first place because someone took unpublished code from him and contributed it to another project. He had permission from his other contributors when he did that but people still went on GPL crusades against him.

                  Now it’s the issue of people re-packaging his releases for other package managers such as AUR (which is against the license) and doing so incorrectly which leads to support requests from the users of broken packages.

                  There’s a whole community of people who have turned hostile to this guy over his decisions but it comes off as a sense of entitlement on their part. This is after all an emulation community which is full of people who simply use these tools to run pirated old games. They don’t understand the hard work that goes into a sophisticated emulator. They just want more, better, faster! Gimme gimme gimme is all they know!

              • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                2 days ago

                You can just not publish your actual contacts and choose what you will and wont offer support on your public facing persona.

                • mesa@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  That’s what I do 😁. No real names unless it’s something I don’t care about.

                  I only support a couple of pip/composer/ect…and others package it up for any specific is or implementation. I always tell people “I will accept new prs” but if say I’m on vacation, I just don’t look at the package. If it’s bad enough, someone can fork and everyone else can move on with their lives. Hasn’t happened yet on the couple of packages that got popular (?) but it’s the lifecycle of open source.

                • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  But then you can’t offer support to users of your upstream code.

                  This is an issue of open source etiquette and there’s no technical solution that can solve it. There have been numerous passionate developers who have been run right out of open source by well-meaning users who simply don’t know the protocol around contacting a developer for support.

              • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Am I misunderstanding something? Was he not present in his own discord server meant for troubleshooting?

                • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  For troubleshooting issues with his code. Not with broken packages created by others that he has no power to fix.

          • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            23
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            2 days ago

            Most people arguing from analogies are doing so because they can’t actually make a coherent argument against THING so they make a bad analogy and then expect you to unwind the 17 ways the analogy and the thing are different. This being a waste of time. I’ll just tell you that your analogy is trash and you should do better.

    • Oisteink@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      3 days ago

      Issue isnt so much the 12 arch users that actually know what they are doing, but all the fucking posers

    • Ŝan@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      83
      ·
      3 days ago

      Arch users can be the most annoying arrogant and conceited people to exist online.

      Ðe maintainers are ðe same. I don’t know if it’s ðe chicken, or ðe egg, but distro maintainers do tend to set ðe tone.

      And, yeah, I use Arch everywhere, because so far everyþing else is worse.

        • Jiggle_Physics@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          For me it is no harder to read, it’s more like people sprinkling in Shakespearean English to their normal speech, it just comes off as either being pretentious, or random xd

          • seralth@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            It just looks like depressed lower case d to me. So de eggs and de chicken. Makes him look like a child from Gaia online trying to be quirky and different which is really rather annoying to read.

            If I wanted to hang around minors I would go spend time with my cousins. Not go to social media.

      • higgsboson@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        No idea what is going on with your comment, but whatever it is is not English. I typically only block spammers and trolls, but happily you definitely fall into one or the other (or both.)