• bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    1 year ago

    It really blows my mind that these people are so dense that they keep blowing money on there studies on why xyz generation won’t waste money on stupid shit like boomers did. We have no money. Everything is way too expensive, and y’all don’t pay us dick. We’d happily spend money if we had money, but it’s damn near impossible to spend excess money when any of the pittance we do receive is gobbled up by bills. And not bills of excess, mind you, but purely survival bills. Our society is pretty much fucked, but no one wants to talk about that, so let’s keep circle jerking about the “mysterious reason” why younger generations are not responding to traditional marketing techniques.

    Insert the Skinner “am I out of touch? No, it must be the kids” meme.

  • PeleSpirit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 year ago

    Generational names like the greatest, boomer, gen x, millennial, gen z were created so that companies know how to market to you. Get ready for a whole lot of marketing to you for payday loans, low interest credit cards and other kinds of financial scams, because they now have put you in that category. I’m sorry you have to work so much, it doesn’t help anyone that you’re not paid a living wage except the ones marketing to you.

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    Take all that fucken money you are dumping into these studies and make some fucking social programs you god damn troglodytes. Its not a mystery, the money has been transferred to the owning class. There is no middle class, there is the owning class and all their wage slaves.

  • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Get a copy of Hunter Thompson’s book about the “Hell’s Angels.”

    There’s a chapter on the economics of being a biker/hippie/artist in the 1970s.

    Some Angels would work six months as a Union stevedore, then take that money and live on the road for two years. A part time waitress could support herself and a musician boy friend.

  • GodlessCommie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    In the meantime the narrative coming from the WH is we are doing great and everything is coming up roses.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s because many of the metrics we’ve always used are looking good. Unemployment is down, inflation is under control, stock market’s bumpin’, all that, economy looks good from those heights.

      Problem is, those metrics aren’t showing the stunning transfer of wealth I’ve seen. And I remember dad in the late 70’s talking to mom on the drive home from church, “The rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer.” (Same trip, mom had some words about the Shiites, because of course the Middle East was the asshole of the world and terrorists were causing a ruckus. And no, I can’t describe the ruckus, forgot.)

      LOL, this is gonna either freak people out, piss 'em off or both:

      Forgot the class, but I think it was around 8th-grade or so, mid-80’s? Our teacher was talking about how corrupt Mexico was because 80% of the wealth was owned by 20% of the population. We kids were stunned that such a thing was real!

      Y’all can take the comments from here. I’m tired.

      • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        One thing you learn in software testing is to optimize for the right metrics. It doesn’t matter if your system can respond to a request in under 10ms if it can’t handle a million requests. It doesn’t matter if your click-through conversion is high if your bounce rate is 90%.

        Our entire economy seems designed to maximize the wrong metrics. Yes, per-capita GDP is astounding, but twelve million kids don’t have enough to eat. Yes, the stock market is doing well but people are having to work two jobs to get by.

        And the really frustrating part is none of the folks in charge seem to get it.

      • agent_flounder@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yup, I heard similar things back then. Middle class has been under attack for ages. I guess Reagan did a number on us. I was too young to understand tax cuts for the rich.