• Draces@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      It means they had the votes for a performative opposition vote and Norman was the most needing

    • floo@retrolemmy.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      No. That just means his name wasn’t on the list. Maybe he didn’t need Jeffrey Epstein’s help to fuck kids.

    • twinnie@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 days ago

      Why is everyone giving Norman a hard time? He voted to release. Give the other guys shit.

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        4 days ago

        On the one hand, I completely agree, and I think I fucked that up by mentioning him by name instead of the 7 pedophiles that voted it down.

        On the other hand, he’s still a shitbag. If he’s catching strays, fuck 'em. In this instance, he voted for some modicum of sanity. He’s also the guy who pulled out his loaded .38 and put it on the table when meeting with Moms Demand Action Against Gun Violence.

        There’s no humanitarian medals for “guy who didn’t protect pedophile rapists.”

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      When Mexico the Republicans send its their people, they’re not sending their best.

      They’re sending people that have lots of problems and they’re bringing those problems with us.

      They’re bringing drugs coverups, they’re bringing defending crime, they’re rapists

      and some, I assume, are good people.

      See kids, rhetoric is easy!