How deep are they willing to guzzle that Nazi boot?

  • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Reading JL’s comments in this thread reminds me of this excellent quote

    “A liberal is someone who opposes every war except the current war and supports all civil rights movements except the one that’s going on right now.”

  • Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    So they’ve gone from “we don’t have a first amendment so shut up” to “we don’t have any ethics so shut up.” Cool.

  • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    2 days ago

    PTB

    Time to post some quotes

    Others I like:

    Those who make peaceful protest impossible make violent revolution inevitable.

    JFK

    Riots are the voice of the unheard

    MLK

  • ordinarylove@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    we’re talking about quoting the guy who put slaves in secret cupboards and trapdoors under tables and shit right

    what’s the name of this shitty movement that guy ended up founding anyway? why quote him?

  • ThorrJo@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    I continue to maintain that the best individual policy is to instance-block .world and let the redditor hoi polloi who end up there self-select onto smaller and better instances as they wake up to what a crappy place the default is. If they aren’t capable of eventually waking up to that, then I don’t really want them in my feed, so .world is a good place for them to be contained.

  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 days ago

    Well ayy, you beat me to making a PTB post on this, but uh yeah…

    .world?

    collaborating with and covering for fascists?

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 days ago

    People should move to other instances and mods of popular communities should migrate the communities as well.

  • Lvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Unless demanded by local legislation, that’s a clear PTB in my book.

    So. You have a link about the usage of force by the dogs of some broligarchic junta. Clearly unnecessary, unless someone thinks people in wheelchair are such a violent threat that it demands such measures. The group was arrested mostly for “Crowding, Obstructing, and Incommoding” - i.e. some “quick, find some law that fits this situation, so we can get rid of those things! Heil Chrump!”.

    Then you have a commenter (the_q) correctly pointing out shit won’t progress unless people actually fight back. And another (PancakesCantKillMe) clearly quoting something; I don’t even know (or care) who this Thomas Turbano guy is, but the second comment is clearly a quote.

    So, let ask me the following: accordingly to the LW mods, is self-defence violence?

    • If it is not, then those comments should not be removed as “advocating violence”.
    • If it is, then they’re effectively promoting that people should lower themselves from human beings to punching bags of their local junta.

    Don’t get me wrong - I don’t even think they’re doing this “intentionally”. I get LW mods are full of Good Intentions®, and for the sake of some idyllic vision of pacifism, where tyrants will magically stop being tyrants if you say them “tyranny bad! EDIT WOW THANKS FOR THE GOLD, KIND STRANGER!”. However Hell is full of good intentions.

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      There are a few news related subs on .world with shitty moderators, the rest of the instance is as chill as anywhere else. If you see .world mentioned here, it is probably the News community.

        • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          I’ve researched a few dozen.

          Every time I dig deep there’s something unreconcialable I find in usually the community or the admins’ unfair moderation practices. Or it’s really small and weird and I don’t understand what it’s about.

          .world is cringe and corporate feeling, like reddit, but the admins are more consistent than the smaller communities I’ve tried.

    • lazynooblet@lazysoci.al
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Lol says the “reddthat” user. Actually it’s a good instance name, but the irony …

        • Stamets@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Is it? There are plenty of subreddits who have taken downvotes out of their community. Badly, but they have. /r/CanadaPolitics will outright ban you if you ever admit to downvoting something in the community.

          The removal of downvotes alone is not remotely sufficient evidence of being “quite different” from Reddit in that regard. Honestly it just reminds me of /r/Conservative and their flair system too. I don’t understand why downvotes are being banished.

        • vxx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Reddit basically removed downvotes as well since the EA comment. You still had the button, but it was inable to change the trend of the first few minutes.

  • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    I mean, in fairness, Thomas Jefferson was a big advocate for violence. As far as he was concerned, if someone was infringing on your rights, the answer was to get some friends with some rifles and go to work.

    • TheDoozer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I mean, for him specifically…

      the answer was to get some friends with some rifles and have them go to work.

      • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        He was in the Virginia militia for 9 years. IDK how much actual fighting he did, he started out as a colonel so maybe not much, but he was in the military.

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Who do we need to be fair to? Nazi sympathizers?

      That aside, does that mean libraries in NL aren’t allowed to carry books that quote Thomas Jefferson? I doubt they have any risk of law enforcement beating their doors down over that…

        • GuyFawkes@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Look out, pointing out that abiding by their rules will lead to no change will get you downvoted to hell because people want to feel like their ineffective actions mean something.

      • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        I’m not agreeing with the mods, I haven’t even looked into the details. I’m pretty sure it is legal to advocate violence in books (or, for that matter, on the internet), it’s just that in the weird quasi-legal regulatory space that is moderated forums it is a universal no no.

        I’m just saying that if the mods are accusing Thomas Jefferson quotes of advocating violence, they are probably right, because he was a big and unapologetic advocate of violence in some circumstances.

        • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 @pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          It is illegal only if it is reasonably going to trigger or calls for any immediate lawlessness. Like straight up trying to get a bunch of people together to knock-over a convenience store or actually organizing a murder.

          Saying “man, I wish this evil son of a bitch took a round in the face” is not such a time. Niether is quoting someone else suggesting violence as a path towards liberty.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          it’s just that in the weird quasi-legal regulatory space that is moderated forums it is a universal no no.

          Where the fuck did you get a nonsense idea like that?

          • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            3 days ago

            Which side of it?

            The side that it’s not actually illegal to advocate violence? “To cross the legal threshold from protected to unprotected speech, the Supreme Court held the speaker must intend to incite or produce imminent lawless action, and the speaker’s words or conduct must be likely to produce such action. These requirements are known as the Brandenburg test.” Unless there’s a decent likelihood that me talking on the internet will actually lead to whatever I’m talking about happening, it’s okay to talk about, which leaves a massive grey area.

            Or the side that threats of violence are not allowed on most moderated spaces on the internet? I’m not sure how I could give you a citation for that one, would you settle for citations from like 5 of the biggest social media platforms as a stand-in?

            • grue@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              The way you phrased it made it sound like social media was somehow being forced to do it rather than choosing to do it themselves.

              • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                3 days ago

                To you, it sounded that way, maybe.

                Or, it’s possible that you didn’t really care whether it “sounded” like I was saying that weird and not true thing (who would even be forcing those social media platforms to do this? “The” government? The devs? The server owners? The corporate owners, of the ones that are corporate which wasn’t what we were talking about?), and just wanted to play the favorite Lemmy game of pretending someone said something everyone knows is false, so you can waste time and typing of all people involved by pretending that absurd thing is what they said and then starting to curse and be hostile at them about how stupid they are for saying that absurd thing they never said. It is fun to do that. Popular too! Have fun with it. Any time you want to join us in the conversation we’re actually having you are welcome to do that too, though.

                • grue@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  How the fuck else was I supposed to interpret “weird quasi-legal regulatory space,” asshole? Jeez, bite my head off for an honest mistake due to your unclear phrasing, why don’t you!

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I thought they were in NL? Also, quoting Thomas Jefferson is not against the law in the USA.

      • besselj@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Shoot, you’re right about the jurisdiction. That makes it even dumber. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

        It can be construed as advocating for violence in this context. Since, ya know, it’s obvious who the tyrants are

        • stoy@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          I never knew where this quote came from, I have heard variants of it several times but never figured out the source until now.

          And if you don’t know that, it is just a random sentence calling for violence.

          Which I can understand the mod not being aware of.