• Jiggle_Physics@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I believe this perspective is important before people start commenting from the headline

    “For example, the study finds the wealthiest 10% of people – defined as those who earn at least €42,980 (£36,605) per year – contributed seven times more to the rise in monthly heat extremes around the world than the global average.”

    Point being, this isn’t talking about extreme wealth

    • dumblederp@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      I’d be interested to see what percentage of damage was being done by the top 1% of wealth.

    • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Measuring wealth by income doesn’t always translate well. When everything you need to live costs five times as much, someone might live very well on 35k in one part of the world and not even be able to afford food, housing and transportation in another on $45k.

      • Jiggle_Physics@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I know, I just didn’t want people to read the headline and then have the comment section be nothing but ranting about billionaires, when this is mostly about how normal “western” people affect the situation.