• proto_jefe@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Seems like too little too late. There are other, more established privacy-oriented platforms in more privacy-respecting countries.

  • Kobo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Removes the we don’t sell your personal data part from firefox’s privacy policy New product “prioritizes privacy over everything else” lol

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Does it? That sounds rather fishy right after Mozilla got a new exec change that focuses on money over everything else

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Something about this seems off but I can’t identify what…

        • Ricky Rigatoni@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          32
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Can you blame people? Any american company is vulnerable to pressure from the american government to do whatever immoral acts it wants.

          • Ulrich@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Remind me which government is attempting to dismantle encryption?

        • puppinstuff@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Pretty much. I don’t want to wake up to find out my email stopped working because a rapist wrote a new executive order after his Big Mac-fueled fever dream.

  • heavydust@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    will never use your email to train AI, flood your inbox with ads, or collect and sell your data

    Like Firefox, it’s good to know. /s

    which injects AI features into the service

    A contradiction in the same piece of news.

    Last but not least, I do hope they are not located in the USA because they would compete with all the other paid email services around the world.

    • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      That’s not a contradiction. I’m not defending the latter bit, to be clear, and I do not use the service. Just pointing out that those things do not contradict each other.

      • heavydust@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Data is sent to NVIDIA, you don’t and can’t know what is done about it. That’s the same for any AI usage that is not local, and most people don’t have the skills to do that.

  • Modest_Toxic@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I’ve been looking to move away from proton mail after the whole thing with the CEO and this looks ideal

      • lemmeBe@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Hopefully, I can shed some light because I’m in the process of looking for a new email provider so I’ve been researching extensively for the past few days.

        Firstly, despite their strong marketing about privacy and encryption, ALL the privacy-focused email providers face the same fundamental limitation when it comes to incoming emails from external sources:

        • They can read incoming external emails upon arrival.
        • They process these emails (for spam filtering, etc.) before encryption.
        • Only after this processing do they encrypt the emails for storage.

        It’s a limitation inherent to the current email infrastructure and affects virtually all email providers as far as I’m aware.

        So, marketing claims about “zero-access encryption” often refer to emails at rest (in storage), not during transit or initial processing. For truly private communication, end-to-end encryption (like PGP) needs to be implemented by the sender before the email reaches any server.

        That being said, Mailbox provides E2E encryption through standard PGP and S/MIME protocols, allowing users to encrypt both incoming and outgoing emails with their own encryption keys that can be generated or imported into the system. Beyond email encryption, they implement domain security and server-side encryption of all stored data, with the option to create secure aliases that only communicate over encrypted connections.

        For Mailbox users communicating with other Mailbox users, there isn’t an automatic E2E system in place by default (like Proton has). Doesn’t matter to me because very little people I communicate with use Mailbox (it’s currently the same situation with Proton for me).

        You could register anonymously, use a VPN, and encrypt your messages with PGP and be safe that way. I, however, consider emails inherently unsafe means of communication and use them for registrations and meaningless communication only.

        Also, Mailbox has Guard feature that creates a temporary mailbox for recipients without PGP. The recipient receives two emails - one with a link to the temporary mailbox and another with the password. You can also add an additional PIN for extra security that you communicate through another channel.

        P. S. Their servers are powered by 100% renewable energy, if that carries any weight.

    • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      Mailbox.org.

      It’s worth paying for a service rather than trust an org that’s been less than direct with us.

      (Mailbox has a free tier that’s limited).

    • Lfrith@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Tuta doesn’t support external email clients, but if you don’t mind using it through the web or their app they have a free tier you can sign up for to see if you like it.

    • puppinstuff@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      I just don’t have the energy to play email host hopscotch. Every capitalist CEO is going to stay something I don’t like with eventually.

      While completely disagreeing, I can tolerate Proton leadership having a preference towards the political party that imposes less red tape. But after the decade of the month it’s been the dude will probably reverse his opinion now that his money is in danger.

      • Bayesian@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I’ve heard it’s best to just buy a domain for your email for hopscotch reasons

        • puppinstuff@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Yes but if one use hundreds of Proton or Fastmail-generated email masks it’s a big switching cost.